Assignment 3

Points: 200 Assignment 3: Staffing the HR Department

Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A 1. Choose three (3) HR functions and assess the significance of each in adding value to your HR department in support of your company’s vision and mission.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely chose three (3) HR functions and did not submit or incompletely assessed the significance of each in adding value to your HR department in support of your company’s vision and mission.

Partially chose three (3) HR functions and partially assessed the significance of each in adding value to your HR department in support of your company’s vision and mission.

Satisfactorily chose three (3) HR functions and satisfactorily assessed the significance of each in adding value to your HR department in support of your company’s vision and mission.

Thoroughly chose three (3) HR functions and thoroughly assessed the significance of each in adding value to your HR department in support of your company’s vision and mission.

2. Write a job description for one (1) of the HR functions you selected. Determine the specific degree (e.g., associates, bachelors, or masters) and certifications (e.g., SHRM, HRCI, ATD, or WorldAtWork) needed. Include the level and type of experience needed (e.g., industry, managerial, customer service, tenure, etc.)

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely wrote a job description for one (1) of the HR functions you selected. Did not submit or incompletely determined the specific degree and certifications needed. Did not submit or incompletely included the level and type of experience needed.

Partially wrote a job description for one (1) of the HR functions you selected. Partially determined the specific degree and certifications needed.

Partially included the level and type of experience needed.

Satisfactorily wrote a job description for one (1) of the HR functions you selected. Satisfactorily determined the specific degree and certifications needed.

Satisfactorily included the level and type of experience needed.

Thoroughly wrote a job description for one (1) of the HR functions you selected. Thoroughly determined the specific degree and certifications needed.

Thoroughly included the level and type of experience needed.

3. Choose one (1) recruitment method and one (1) selection method you will use in order to attract the best quality candidates for these positions. Provide a rationale for your choices.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely chose one (1) recruitment method and one (1) selection method you will use in order to attract the best quality candidates for these positions. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your choices.

Partially chose one (1) recruitment method and one (1) selection method you will use in order to attract the best quality candidates for these positions. Partially provided a rationale for your choices.

Satisfactorily chose one (1) recruitment method and one (1) selection method you will use in order to attract the best quality candidates for these positions. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your choices.

Thoroughly chose one (1) recruitment method and one (1) selection method you will use in order to attract the best quality candidates for these positions. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your choices.

4. Develop a compensation and benefit package for the new HR staff.

Did not submit or incompletely developed a compensation and

Partially developed a compensation and benefit package for the

Satisfactorily developed a compensation and benefit package for the

Thoroughly developed a compensation and benefit package for

Explain how this package will provide a high return on investment to the company.

Weight: 15%

benefit package for the new HR staff. Did not submit or incompletely explained how this package will provide a high return on investment to the company.

new HR staff. Partially explained how this package will provide a high return on investment to the company.

new HR staff. Satisfactorily explained how this package will provide a high return on investment to the company.

the new HR staff. Thoroughly explained how this package will provide a high return on investment to the company.

5. 3 references

Weight: 10%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

7. Appropriate Use of APA In-Text Citations and Reference

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

8. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in- text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.