| Assessment 3: | Not-for-Profit |
| 1) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Determine if the NFP's statements conform to the FASB guidance, explaining how the selected NFP uses the required fund categories and recommend at least two areas of potential interest to stakeholders concerning the NFP's revenue and expense status. | Did not determine if the NFP's statements conformed to the FASB guidance or explain how the NFP used the required fund categories or recommend at least two areas of potential interest to stakeholders concerning NFP's revenue and expense status. | Did not determine or inadequately determined if the NFP's financial statements conformed to the FASB guidance. Did not explaining how the selected NFP used at least one of the required fund categories or recommended at least one area of potential interest to stakeholders concerning the NFP's revenue and expense status. | Determined if the NFP's financial statements conformed to the FASB guidance, explaining how the selected NFP used at least one of the required fund categories and recommended at least one area of potential interest to stakeholders concerning the NFP's revenue and expense status. | Determined if the NFP's financial statements conformed to the FASB guidance, explaining how the selected NFP used the required fund categories and recommended at least one area of potential interest to stakeholders concerning the NFP's revenue and expense status. | Determined if the NFP's financial statements conformed to the FASB guidance, explaining how the selected NFP used the required fund categories and recommended at least two areas of potential interest to stakeholders concerning the NFP's revenue and expense status. |
| 2) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Explain the format utilized and point out any unique areas of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format. | Did not identify the the format utilized to prepare the Statement of Cash Flows or any unique areas of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format. | Identified but did not adequately explain the format used to prepare the Statement of Cash Flows or did not accurately point out unique areas of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format. | Identified but did not adequately explain the format utilized to prepare the Statement of Cash Flows and pointed out at least one area of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format. | Accurately explained the format utilized to prepare the Statement of Cash Flows and pointed out at least one area of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format | Accurately explained the format utilized to prepare the Statement of Cash Flows and pointed out at least two areas of emphasis that differ from GAAP accounting format |
| 3) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Compare the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions, discussing the funds used. | Did not or inadequately compared the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions and did not or inadequately discussed the funds used. | Inadequately compared the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions and inadequately discussed the funds used. | Accurately compared the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions, but did not discuss or inadequately discussed the funds used. | Accurately compared the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions, discussing at least two funds used. | Accurately compared the organization's reporting of pledges and contributions to its reporting of exchange transactions, discussing the funds used. |
| 4) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Assess the fiscal condition of the selected NFP organization, interpreting financial indicators specific to NFPs and financial ratios widely accpeted as being indicative of fiscal health. | Did not assess the fiscal condition of the selected NFP or inadequately assessed the fiscal condition of the NFP organization, providing irrelevant data. | Inadequately assessed the fiscal condition of the selected NFP organization, providing financial indicators irrelevant for an NFP or irrelevant widely accepted financial ratios. | Assessed the fiscal condition of the selected NFP organization, but did not provide a finanical indicator specific to a NFP or did not not provide at least two widely accpted financial ratios. | Assessed the fiscal condition of the selected NFP organization, interpreting at least one financial indicators specific to NFPs and at least two widely accepted financial ratios. | Assessed the fiscal condition of the selected NFP organization, interpreting both financial indicators specific to NFPs and widely accepted financial ratios. |
| 5) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Use at least three quality sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time withing your assignment. | Did not cite any sources. | Did not cite the required number of sources and one or more sources were not credible, relevant or appropriate. | Cited required number of sources but two sources were not credible, relevant or appropriate. | Cited required number of sources but one source was not credible, relevant or appropriate. | Cited at least three credible, relevant and appropriate sources. |
| 6) | Unacceptable | Needs Improvement | Satisfactory | Competent | Exemplary |
| Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling in accordance with SWS style. | Produced writing that lacks clarity, organization, or does not apply SWS sytl. There are significant issues with grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are significant in number (7 or more), and the reader will have difficulty understanding the writing. | Produced writing that has noticeable issues with clarity, organization, and the application of SWS style. Errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling detract from readability. Overall, there were frequent errors (5-6) and have a definite impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing. | Produced writing that attempts to be clear and well organized and to apply appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There are multiple errors (3-4) that distract from the reader's ability to understand the writing. | Produced writing that attempts to be clear and well organized and to apply appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There may be occasional errors (1-2), but they do not impact the ability of the reader to understand the writing. | Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling with no errors. |