two people are submitting this same assignment so i want to make major changes that teacher cannot recognize that we have submitted same assigment
Assignment – 3
Stakeholders in Sustainable Business Transformation
PREPARED BY
Mandeep Kaur (STUDENT ID: T00592597)
Submitted to
Mr. RONALD LAKE
Course code: MNGT 3711
Department of Management, Thompson Rivers University
In partial fulfillment of requirement for
POST BACCULARATE DIPLOMA IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
THOMPSON RIVERS UNIVERSITY
2018
PART A
Q1. Describe the ways in which the widespread adoption of clean cook stoves will address the global environmental issues discussed in Chapter 9
The widespread adoption of clean cook stoves in developing nations could address global environmental issues such as ozone depletion, climate change, and declining biodiversity and water resources. In the current state, many households in developing nations are using open cook stoves that are having short and long-term adverse effects on the environment. This is mainly attributed to “cutting trees to produce wood or charcoal [which] leads to deforestation, loss of biodiversity and watershed degradation” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 233). The use of wood and animal dung as a fuel to cook creates soot, or black carbon, which, beyond the immediate health hazards, releases into the atmosphere and is “second only to carbon dioxide in its overall contribution to global warming” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 233). Fortunately, it “washes out within days or weeks” unlike carbon dioxide, but still contributes, to global warming, ozone depletion, and climate change nonetheless.
Many companies are assisting with the Global Alliance for Clean Cook stoves by developing alternatives to the open cook stove, many of which have reduced or eliminated the environmental impact in these nations. One stove was “designed to burn charcoal, a fuel used by 30 percent of Ghanaian households, twice as efficiently as in an open fire” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 233) which would reduce the environmental impact, as well as, the financial burdens of using an open cook stove, something I will address further in the second part of this question. Another company “experimented with ways to harness the power of the sun – a completely renewable, clean, and free source of energy – to boil water and cook food” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 233) which has the potential to eliminate many of the environmental impacts expressed above.
As improvements and innovations in technology increase rapidly, so do the opportunities for companies and nations to take initiative and tackle the global environmental issues discussed in Chapter 9.
Q2. Describe the ways in which the widespread adoption of clean cook stoves will address the issues of economic development and poverty discussed in Chapter 9.
The widespread adoption of clean cook stoves in developing nations could address the issues of economic development and poverty such as world inequality, technological innovation, industrial ecology, and carbon neutrality. To address these issues “sustainable development will require technology cooperation through long-term partnerships between companies in developed and developing countries to transfer environmental technologies” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 229). Above, I presented a few technologies that have started addressing the environmental issues, but there are many social benefits associated with the use of these technologies as well. “Increased fuel efficiency saved families about ten dollars a month, in a society in which 80 percent of the population lived on two dollars a day or less” (Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J., 2014, p. 233). This is just one of many essential movements required to reduce world inequality in wealth in terms income and livelihoods.
With companies investing in R&D into clean technologies, it has spillover effects which could lead to the development of globally embraced clean technologies that could revolutionize consumer and producer behaviour even in developed nations. These movements could pave the path for industrial ecology being practiced by companies in nations around the world, regardless of global status, and a widely embraced goal of carbon neutrality in business practices.
As improvements and innovations in technology increase rapidly, so do the opportunities for companies and nations to take initiative and tackle the issues of economic development and poverty discussed in Chapter 9.
Part B
Interface, Inc.
Ray Anderson of Interface Inc. points the way to high profitability and zero waste- a future that merges economic growth with social responsibility.
Ray Anderson has spent most of his life as an environmental vandal. He has devoted his career – the better part of four decades – to mastering the black magic of the 20th century: He takes huge lakes of petroleum and spins them into elegant brocades. The petroleum, which took millions of years to make, is irreplaceable. The brocades – beautiful woven fabrics that carpet offices and corridors from the U.S. Capitol to MTV headquarters – will last forever. After just 10 years, most of that fabric will end up in the dump.
Indeed, Anderson’s success has been marked by a kind of galloping enviro-gluttony. He is the 63-year-old founder and CEO of Interface Inc., an Atlanta-based company with 7,300 employees. Its business: turning petrochemicals into textiles. In 26 factories on four continents, Anderson’s looms produce a million pounds of synthetic carpet and fabric every day – along with more than seven tons of air pollutants every year. Four years ago, Anderson made a decision that changed the course of his carpet company, and that could transform the nation’s economy. He decided that Interface would become, as he put it, “the first fully sustainable industrial enterprise, anywhere.” Anderson decided that his petrochemical conglomerate would become 100% environmentally benign.
His vision for the 21st century: Interface would no longer use virgin nylon yarn to stitch its fabrics. Interface’s factories and offices would use power from renewable sources only. Interface would produce zero waste; indeed, it would reclaim its own products and use them as raw material for new textiles. And Interface would pull its suppliers and customers into its sustainability orbit, insisting that the products it bought be recyclable and nontoxic, pushing clients to think differently about carpeting – and about their own businesses. “I want to pioneer the company of the next industrial revolution,” says Ray Anderson.
Anderson wants to turn the entire U.S. economy inside out. He wants to harness the awesome, triumphant engine of democratic capitalism to the task of fixing the environment – before that engine suffocates on its own waste. The concept is simple: For its first century, industrial capitalism has been obliviously, relentlessly linear: raw materials, energy, product, packaging, marketing, waste. In the century to come, Anderson wants business to evolve to the next level: cyclic capitalism. Companies would consume their own waste. Landfills, after a, are best seen as a yardstick of the failure of human ingenuity. In nature, there is no garbage; everyone’s waste becomes someone else’s food.
But a dramatic change has taken hold at the company. From the factory floor to the R&D lab, sustainability has become as important a consideration in every business decision as profitability. Interface, for instance, has developed a new idea about carpeting and customers: It wants to lease carpet instead of selling it. The company would make, install, and maintain the carpet, take it back from customers, and then turn the old carpet into new carpet.
Says John Picard, a corporate environmental consultant who helped Interface develop the leasing idea: “Ray Anderson is going to be one of those people you look back on and say, ‘He changed the world.’ Interface is the corporation of the 21st century.”
Section 1 – External force or influence
“The external environment consists of a variety of factors outside your company doors that you typically don't have much control over” (Kokemuler, N., 2016). Three external forces that have influenced the company’s shift to more environmentally and socially responsible business management practices are demographic factors, environmental impacts, and government regulations.
Demographic factors, including changing preferences, social stigmas, and public relations may have been the factor that set in motion Interface’s shift towards more sustainability and social responsibility. In the video The Epiphany, Ray Anderson says that the question “what is your company doing for the environment?” sparked the drive within him to reassess how Interface was conducting business. He noticed that stakeholder preferences had shifted away from what had been considered the regular business standard, the drive of profit. The public was now focused on sustainability, and how day to day business was affecting society in the long term. Ray then challenged his company to “adopt a bold vision, one that required new thinking and a new model for business” (Interface, 2016) and this report will outline not only the other factors that influenced the shift, but the many ways in which Interface is evolving, all of which have contributed to the growth and development of the company in recent years.
Environmental impacts, including climate change and intergenerational factors, appear to be one of the most influential force for Interface and as such, Mission Zero was implemented: the goal of becoming a carbon neutral company by 2020. The goal has driven the creation and implementation of many environmental programs that have impacts on energy, climate, waste, facilities and transportation. Chart 1 outlines the fronts of what Interface has come to call Mount Sustainability, and outlines the goals and tasks associated with each of the fronts, and many of the programs have been developed to address one or more of the goals.
The energy programs are aimed at maximizing energy efficiency and using renewable energy resources to conduct day to day business, which is quite the feat for such a petroleum intensive industry. For climate, they have emphasized the importance of partnership and collaboration to measure and reduce emissions where necessary, and purchase carbon offsets where elimination is not possible. The waste programs at Interface have “gone beyond the walls of the factory to examine all aspects of our business for opportunities to reduce and eliminate waste, including product design, packaging and transportation” (Interface, 2016) and has led to a 91% reduction in total waste since 1996. Interface has adopted green building and operational standards worldwide to decreased the harmful effects of their business on the environment in the four continents they conduct business in. Interface has also reassessed how transportation, throughout the supply chain and internally at the facilities, are having an impact on the environment. Three programs were implemented to offset the environmental effects of internal transportation: Trees for Travel, a “program designed to track and neutralize the carbon emissions from employee business air travel,” Cool Fuel, a “program to track and offset carbon emissions from company car” usage, and Cool CO2mmute, a “program offering Interface employees the opportunity to neutralize the emissions from their daily commutes and personal travel” (Interface, 2016).
Although not explicitly described as a factor on the website, government regulations likely play a role in the shift to more environmental and socially responsible business. “The EPA has primary responsibility for enforcing many of the environmental statutes and regulations of the United States” (EPA, 2016) and has policies for air, compliance and enforcement, pesticides and toxic substances, waste, and water. Although not all these affect Interface, many of them do and in their actions to shift to their new model of business, they have reduced or eliminated many of the factors that would be affected by further government regulation. In most cases, a company is more likely to embrace changes, especially those that have taken place at Interface, when it is at their own will than when being forced to do so because of regulation or other government intervention. Interface appears to be ahead of the game in meeting environmental government regulations as discussed throughout this report, and has given them a competitive advantage in the industrial world.
Section 2- Internal force or influence
“The internal business environment includes factors within the organization that impact the approach and success of your operations” (Kokemuler, N., 2016). Two internal forces that have influenced Interface’s shift to more environmentally and socially responsible business management practices are Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and organizational capabilities and management preferences.
Corporate Social Responsibility factors like human rights, labour standards, the environment and ethical practices are just some of the key factors that Interface has focused on to set the stage for more socially responsible business management and are likely due to the influences they have on the shift towards being more sustainable and socially responsible. As a MNC, Interface conducts businesses in many countries around the world and needs to adhere to a diverse set of changing standards and regulations. “Interface supports fundamental human rights for all people, and is committed to complying with employment laws in every country in which it operates” (Interface, 2016). It also complies with labour standards in these countries, but has taken on the responsibility of maintaining the integrity of their labour standards in other countries by eliminating discriminatory practices and child labour in their factories in the countries in which they conduct business in. As mentioned above, their commitment to the environment has fostered a culture within the organization to embrace sustainability and socially responsible business practices. “Interface seeks to maintain accountability, integrity, and high ethical standards in the pursuit of the company’s business objectives. Interface engages in honest and ethical conduct to comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations” (Interface, 2016). They have implemented a Code of Business Code and Ethics as well as a Supplier Code of Conduct to solidify their commitment to corporate social responsibility.
Management preferences is one of the most influential internal factors of an organization in motivating and driving improvements in the company’s strategic business initiatives and progression toward its sustainability goals. For Interface, the direction came from Ray Anderson who whole heartedly believed a shift towards more sustainable and socially responsible business practices was the right move for the company. In the video The Epiphany, Ray attributes the birth of the movement to feeling embarrassed when asked about what his company was doing for the environment and he did not have an answer. With that, he was inspired to change the way Interface conducted business and believed that they had the organizational capabilities to do so.
This affected all aspects of the business, including the design process, manufacturing, innovation and transparency. For the design process, Interface embraced “new thinking, like Biomimicry, [that] offers a fresh perspective on product design, while analysis tools like Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provide valuable information on [their] products’ impacts. [They’ve] also developed strategies for dematerialization and the use of recycled materials to reach [their] goal of sustainable products” (Interface, 2016). For manufacturing, raw materials, water use, and the supply chain would see the most change. “Interface has drastically reduced its water use through process changes and fixture replacement” (Interface, 2016) and is currently seeking alternatives for petroleum-based raw materials. They have also educated their suppliers on their Mission Zero goal through supplier summits which has “resulted in solutions ranging from small steps to reduce climate impacts to new and innovative technologies that increase the recycled content of [their] products” (Interface, 2016).
Section 3- Global impacts of Sustainable Development
One potential global impact of the sustainable development initiatives of Interface Global is expressed explicitly in their values and guiding principle: “To be the first company that, by its deeds, shows the entire industrial world what sustainability is in all its dimensions: People, process, product, place and profits — by 2020 — and in doing so we will become restorative through the power of influence” (Interface Global, 2016). Influence and social pressures go a long way in the current age of business and with all the innovative products and research and development, Interface has truly differentiated itself in the tile and carpet business, but also in the industrial sector. This plays greatly into demographic factors, like the ever-changing preferences of consumers and social trends that constantly challenge businesses to adapt, and have certainly given Interface a competitive advantage in many areas of their target market. These actions will likely encourage other businesses around the world to revaluate how they conduct business and better understand not only the negative external effects, but the benefits of conducting business in a more environmentally sustainable and socially responsible way.
In Activity 3-3 we were asked to consider if the initiatives were serious or just a public relations strategy, and my response was: “based on the scale of changes that Interface has seen in the past years, the number of programs in practice, and how rapidly these changes are seeing an impact on the company meeting their lofty goals, I believe these are serious initiatives before they are a public relations strategy, although the seriousness of the initiatives contributes to the latter nonetheless” (Armstrong, D., 2017). After further research to complete this assignment, I still feel like Interface is serious and passionate about their goals and initiatives.
Section 4- Harnessing technology for Sustainable Development
Interface attributes its sustainability successes to innovation and claims that their “commitment to Mission Zero has fostered an entrepreneurial spirit inspiring innovative thinkers to imagine unique solutions.” This is prevalent in their business decisions and operations and is shared with the world using the Internet. Interface has a great, comprehensive website that has information on the company, their products, sustainability, and investor relations, and the Founder and Chairman, Ray Anderson, uses the space to share his story and company successes.
Innovation in infrastructure has attributed to the development of several LEED certified Interface buildings around the world, including Chicago, China, and Thailand. “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification system, [is] a third-party certification program that awards recognition for high performance green buildings” (Interface, 2016). Innovation in production process has resulted in the adoption of several projects and products that have helped foster the push towards sustainability, and include Entropy, Tactile, Net-Works, and Cool Carpets. Inspired by Biomimicry, “the unique pattern and coloration of Entropy tiles results in less manufacturing waste and allows for non-directional installation, which is much faster and less wasteful than traditional floorcoverings” (Interface, 2016). Tactile are small adhesive squares that eliminates the use of glue when installing carpets. “The result is less waste, low VOCs and greater savings, not to mention an environmental footprint that is over 90% lighter than that of traditional glue adhesives” (Interface, 2016). “The Net-Works program sources fishing nets from coastal areas, cleaning up oceans and beaches while creating financial opportunities for people in impoverished communities” (Interface, 2016) that has enabled Interface to close the loop for sourcing raw materials for use in the production of their carpets. Lastly, “Cool Carpet is the world’s first carbon neutral carpet” (Interface, 2016) and is achieved by purchasing and retiring carbon offsets each year based on measurements by a third party. These are just some of the many ways that Interface is using the Internet and other technologies to move toward sustainable business and development.
Mount Sustainability (Interface, 2016)
Goals and task
1. Eliminate waste- Eliminate all form of waste in every area of business.
2. Benign emission- Eliminate toxic substances from products, vehicles and facilities.
3. Renewable energy- Operate facilities with 100% renewable energy.
4. Close the loop- Redesign processes and products to close the technical loop using recovered and bio-based materials.
5. Resource Efficient Transportation- Transport people and products efficiently to eliminate waste and emissions.
6. Sensitive Stakeholders- Create a culture that uses sustainability principles to improve the lives and livelihoods of all of our stakeholders - employees, partners, suppliers, customers, investors and communities
7. Redesign commerce- Create a new business model that demonstrates and supports the value of sustainability-based commerce.
Reference-
Armstrong, D (2017). Dexterintheclassroom-mngt3711. Retrieved on Feb. 15, 2017 from https://dexterintheclassroommngt3711.wordpress.com/
EPA (2016). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved on Feb. 15, 2017 from https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/policy-guidance
Fishman. C (1998).www.fastcompany.com.retrivedfrom
https://www.fastcompany.com/33906/sustainable-growth-interface-inc
Interface Global (2016). Welcome to Interface. Retrieved on Feb. 6, 2017 from http://www.interfaceglobal.com/
Kokemuller, N. (2016). What Are Internal & External Environmental Factors That Affect Business? Retrieved on Feb. 15, 2017 from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/internal-external-environmental-factors-affect-business-69474.html
Lawrence, A. T. & Webber, J. (2014). Business and Society Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. McGraw-Hill, Irwin