Assignment 2 2.27

CIMA 706: Assignment 3 Scoring Rubric [The Interview]

Section 1: Introduction [ 10 Total Points ]

A. Identified Interviewee and Rational for Why the Subject was Selected for Study in Relation to Educational Change

a. Protected the individual’s/interviewee’s identity

1. Used professional title/job role in lieu of first and last name.

b. Provided background details about the interviewee and their connections to educational change.

1. Included interviewee’s credentials, accomplishments, number of years in job-role, and details about their reputation.

c. Described Interview Format/Structure

1. Disclosed format style (e.g., face-to-face, telephone, video conference)

2. Provided details about: date, time, place, timeline/duration of meeting

Section 2: Summary of the Interview [ 35 Points ]

A. Provided 10 to 15 Interview questions and brief summary of interviewee’s responses to the interview questions.

a. Discussed the interviewee’s philosophies of change management.

1. Connected interviewee’s philosophies to Module topics and Essential/Guiding questions demonstrated in Modules 1-6.

2. Provided direct quotes from the interview conversation to support this section of the paper.

b. Included direct quotes obtained from the interviewee that supported the writer’s findings on the interviewee’s philosophies of change management.

B. Provided discussion about whether or not responses to the interview questions were similar to or differed from personal perceptions and understandings of educational change and change management processes.

a. Provided insight into whether or not the interviewee influenced the writer’s perceptions of educational change and change management processes.

1. Included specific statements from responses to the interview questions to support the writer’s position.

2. Connected information in Section 2, Subsection B to course readings: Senge et. al., (2012), Module 1-6 Readings that justified position.

3. Provided direct quotes from the interview conversation to support positions described in Section 2, Subsection Section B.

C. Lessons Learned

a. Discussed and connected lessons learned from the interview activity (and individual interviewed) to Module topics.

1. Mapped lessons learned to Senge et. al., (2012), and Modules 1-6 Reading Activities/Materials by providing in-text citations that supported the writer’s position.

b. Discussed the writer’s understandings of educational change and whether or not the interview had effects (e.g., changed) on understandings described; and whether or not the information obtained supported or refuted the writer’s perceptions of educational change.

1. Supported position by providing a minimum of three supporting details, such as, quotes, statements obtained from the interview that were similar to or different from course readings.

c. Provided details about new lessons learned about educational change based on details obtained from the interview conversation.

1. Discussed unforeseen/unanticipated/unexpected/surprising

and/or concerning details about educational change that emerged from interviewee’s responses to the interview questions.

2. Provided and connected direct quotes from the interview to in-text citation from course reading material to support information described in Section 2, Subsection 3.

Section 3: Comparative Analysis [20 Points ]

A. Discussed similarities and differences between the interviewee’s philosophies and approaches to educational change and information provided in Senge et. al., (2012), and Modules 1-6 Readings Materials.

a. Supported/Justified position by citing course reading material Demonstrated in-text citations from course reading materials that map to Reference List.

b. Applied direct quotes and/or statements obtained from the interview to Section 3, Subset A.

Section 4: Conclusions |15 Points |

A. Provided Brief Summary of Lessons Learned from the Interview

a. Recounted summary details described in Section 2 of the paper; key points were included.

1. Provided summary of new discoveries about Educational Change and Change Management Processes, based on insights learned from the interview

b. Discussed personal perceptions of Leadership and Educational Change

Section 5: References [Minimum of 6] & Appendix [10 points]

A. Reference List included Senge et. al. (2012) and 5-other data sources derived from course reading materials that were retrieved from Modules 1-6.

a. Provided in-text citations across Sections 1-5 that map to the Reference List.

B. Provided Appendix

a. Interview Questions [10 to 15 Questions]

b. Provided record of communication correspondence(s) between the interviewer (e.g., writer) and the interviewee (e.g., individual interviewed).

c. Removed identifiable information to protect the interviewee’s anonymity.

APA: Citations & Mechanics-Style [10 Points]

1-error = 1-Point b. [N = < 10] More than 10 Errors = -10 Points and/or no points added to the sum total of points on Sections 1-5