Assignment 3

8/25/2020

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 1/3

Assignment 3 Rubric

Assignment 3: Diversity and Ethics

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F Needs Improvement 65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B Exemplary 100% A

SOC101-A3-1 1. Thoughtfully reflects on past experiences as they relate to consideration of diverse and ethical perspectives.

0.00 % Does not reflect on past experiences.

65.00 % Minimally reflects on past experiences (background, unique perspectives), but the connection to diverse and ethical perspectives is unclear.

75.00 % Partially reflects on past experiences (background, unique perspectives) and partially connects them to diverse and ethical perspectives.

85.00 % Satisfactorily reflects on past experiences (background, unique perspectives) and how they connect to diverse and ethical perspectives.

100.00 % Thoroughly reflects on past experiences (background, unique perspectives) and how they connect to diverse and ethical perspectives. Provides concrete examples to support reflection.

SOC101-A3-2 2. Identifies relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed.

0.00 % Does not identify relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed.

65.00 % Insufficiently identifies the relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed.

75.00 % Partially identifies the relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed.

85.00 % Satisfactorily identifies the relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed. References the scenario in the explanation.

100.00 % Thoroughly identifies the relevant sociological concepts that tie to the situation posed. Explains, using evidence from the scenario, how concepts are tied to the situation posed.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

8/25/2020 tempSOC10110xcrane

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 2/3

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F Needs Improvement 65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B Exemplary 100% A

SOC101-A3-3 3. Applies diverse and ethical perspectives to a decision- making process. Provides specific examples from personal experience or the scenario posed.

0.00 % Does not apply diverse or ethical perspectives to a decision- making process.

65.00 % Insufficiently applies diverse or ethical perspectives to a decision- making process.

75.00 % Partially applies diverse or ethical perspectives to a decision- making process. Provides a specific example from personal experience or the scenario posed.

85.00 % Satisfactorily applies diverse and ethical perspectives to a decision- making process. Provides a specific example from personal experience or the scenario posed.

100.00 % Thoroughly applies diverse and ethical perspectives to a decision- making process. Provides two or more specific examples from personal experience or the scenario posed.

SOC101-A3-4 4. Articulates the value of incorporating diverse and ethical perspectives when making decisions.

0.00 % Does not articulate the value of diverse and ethical perspectives.

65.00 % Insufficiently articulates the value of diverse and ethical perspectives.

75.00 % Partially articulates the value of diverse and ethical perspectives.

85.00 % Satisfactorily articulates the value of incorporating diverse and ethical perspectives when making decisions, using general examples.

100.00 % Thoroughly articulates the value of incorporating diverse and ethical perspectives when making decisions, using concrete examples to support the argument.

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

8/25/2020 tempSOC10110xcrane

https://blackboard.strayer.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_859038_1&course_id=_273455_1 3/3

Levels of Achievement

Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% F Needs Improvement 65% D

Fair 75% C Proficient85% B Exemplary 100% A

SOC101-A3-5 5. Describes ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives. Includes concrete examples from the identified problem.

0.00 % Does not describe ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives.

65.00 % Describes ineffective or inappropriate ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives.

75.00 % Describes general ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives.

85.00 % Satisfactorily describes ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives. Includes concrete examples from the identified problem.

100.00 % Thoroughly describes ways to raise awareness and communicate the importance of considering diverse and ethical perspectives. Includes concrete examples from the identified problem.

SOC101-A3-6 6. Writes in a professional manner using proper grammar and spelling.

0.00 % Writing does not meet minimal standards. Tone is not professional. Wholly lacking in logic, clarity, and/or consistent formatting. Contains many spelling and/or grammatical errors.

65.00 % Writing meets minimal standards. Tone is not professional. Lacks one or more of logic, clarity, and/or consistent formatting. May contain more than 4 spelling and/or grammatical errors.

75.00 % Writing is satisfactory. Tone is somewhat professional. Shows moderate logic, clarity, and/or consistent formatting. May contain 2–4 spelling and/or grammatical errors.

85.00 % Writing is mostly good. Tone is professional. Shows logic, clarity, and consistent formatting. May contain few or no spelling and/or grammatical errors.

100.00 % Writing is excellent. Tone is professional and sophisticated. Shows logic, clarity, and consistent formatting. Contains no spelling or grammatical errors.

Weight 15.00%

Weight 5.00%