Assignment 3
Aquarius21
Assignment3.docxAssignment 3
Summative Test Blueprint (*This assignment must be approved by your professor before you can submit your summative assessment next week, so be sure to plan accordingly.) Now that you have practiced writing questions at various levels of rigor, create a blueprint (table) of how you will construct your summative test for your unit. Refer back to your reading from Week 1. You must have three levels of rigor. How many questions will you have at each level for your standard? This should be a good representation of each level. Level 1 questions should NOT be the majority of your test. Remember, you are not yet creating your questions.
This is the standard: RL 4.4-Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including those that allude to significant characters found in mythology (e.g., Herculean).
You are not creating a test. I just need the blueprint for now.
All assignment has to be turn in to Turnitin. So please make it original.
The rubric is attached.
|
Criterion |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Basic |
Minimal |
|
Content of Blueprint |
Summative Test Blueprint outlines more than 25 questions; Blueprint displays a focus on higher level thinking with more questions identified at DOK levels 2 and 3. (30 pts.) |
Summative Test Blueprint outlines the minimum of 25 questions; Blueprint displays an equal distribution of questions at DOK levels 1, 2, and 3. (25.5 pts.) |
Summative Test Blueprint outlines less than 25 questions; Blueprint outlines a minimum number of questions at DOK levels 2 and 3. (21 pts.) |
Summative Test Blueprint outlines less than 20 questions; Blueprint outlines a majority of the questions at DOK level 1. (16.5 pts.) |
|
APA - compliant formatting |
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (NO errors) (5 pts.) |
Consistently follows APA format. There is a properly formatted and accurate reference page (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25 pts.) |
Limited (3-5) APA errors in APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (3.5 pts.) |
More than 5 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references. (2.75 pts.) |
|
Mechanics |
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS. (5 pts.) |
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (1-2 MINOR errors). (4.25 pts.) |
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (3-5 errors). (3.5 pts.) |
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). (More than 5 errors). (2.75 pts.) |
