Write a reading reflection essay of chapters 16, 18, and 19 in Cruse (2011). Your essay should consist of an introduction, body, and conclusion.
amhs2000
Assignment3.docx
Write a reading reflection essay of chapters 16, 18, and 19 in Cruse (2011). Your essay should consist of an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Your paper should include the following components:
1. A brief overview of the chapters.
2. The notes you took during the classes covering the chapters. Write, a detailed description of some aspects of the chapters and the experience that you felt was particularly meaningful for you.
3. A discussion of what you have personally learned, -your weaknesses and your strengths. Also, discuss your plans for improving your learning experience “of some aspects in the chapters”, how you are going to use the internet “in particular” to fill the gaps in your understanding.
* Your essay should be written in around 600 words.
* Use Times New Roman font – size 12.
* The paper should be double spaced
Reflection Evaluation Criteria (the rubric)
|
Criteria |
Superior (4-5 points) |
Sufficient (3-4 points) |
Minimal (2-3 points) |
Unacceptable (0-1 points) |
|
Depth of Reflection
|
Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the chapters. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable. |
Response demonstrates a general reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the chapters. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable.
|
Response demonstrates a minimal reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the chapters. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment. |
Response demonstrates a lack of reflection on, or personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the chapters. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. |
|
Required Components
|
Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly. All attachments and/or additional documents are included, as required. |
Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed. All attachments and/or additional documents are included, as required. |
Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed. Some attachments and additional documents, if required, are missing or unsuitable for the purpose of the assignment. |
Response excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment are addressed minimally, inadequately, and/or not at all. |
|
Structure
|
Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. |
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. |
Writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing.
|
Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response.
|
|
Evidence and Practice |
Response shows strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the chapters. The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning practices are thoroughly detailed, as applicable. |
Response shows evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the chapters. The implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning practice are presented, as applicable. |
Response shows little evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the chapters. Few implications of these insights for the respondent's overall learning practices are presented, as applicable. |
Response shows no evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the chapters No implications for the respondent's overall learning practices are presented, as applicable. |
