assignment 3
Anger HU
Assignment3.docxNote
This task is very important, so please follow the requirements below to complete
This course is Global: Analysis and Response
The structure of this article must be based on the following requirements.
This is a fussy professor's task, so it must be done carefully.
Group Assignment 3 – Due in Week 5
This is an Assignment to explore Regional Trade Agreements and the impacts on domestic as well as global nations. Go to the readings list (Week 5) and select the ones pertaining to your countries/regions.
One Example (OBOR) – areas you should explore
· Discuss the pros and cons regarding the Chinese efforts from the perspectives of the US and Europe, with respect to the expanding Chinese influence and Chinese economic power around the globe.
· How do you synthesize your learning of Regional Agreements with your learning on globalization? Lessons learned
For more information:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/one-belt-one-road-obor.asp
https://www.fbicgroup.com/sites/default/files/B&R_Initiative_65_Countries_and_Beyond.pdf
www.Theglobalist.com/countries
https://www.efta.int/free-trade
https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/other-initiatives/middle-east-free-trade-area-initiative-mefta
· Research data. Do not hesitate to analyze or explain the data, and the assumptions underlying the data.
· At no time, or no way should you violate academic integrity. Please be keenly aware that you will be found out and the entire paper can receive a zero. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the team to demand to review sources and check for plagiarism.
· This is not a Q&A paper, although you will be evaluated on whether you have failed to address any issues. Create a cohesive paper that connects all the points with a proper introduction and conclusion.
· There must in in text citations and a reference page. Data tables can be placed at the end of the paper. They must be appropriately numbered and sourced. The body of the paper should make the reference to the data, where appropriate.
· The paper must follow the APA style for the structure, spacing, etc. All references must also be in APA style. There is a link in Modules with a link for APA information.
· In an APA styled double spaced paper, there is approximately 200 words per page. With three persons in a group, each person should contribute 500 – 600 words, for a total of 1,500 – 1,800 words. This excludes Title, Abstract, References and Tables.
The Grading Rubric is given below.
GRADING RUBRIC
|
%
|
CRITERION |
EXCELLENT 90+ |
GOOD 80-89 |
AVERAGE 70 -79 |
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 60 - 69 |
FAILED <60 |
|
1
15%
|
Analysis of the History and Scope of OBOR
|
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the subject. Relates important events and consequences Raises several political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR.
|
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the subject. Relates many of the important events and consequences Raises few political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the subject. Relates few of the important events and consequences Does not raise any secondary concerns. |
Demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the subject.
|
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of OBOR and its scope. |
|
2
20% |
Analysis of the Financing of OBOR
|
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the subject. Relates important events and consequences Raises several political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. |
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the subject. Relates some important events and consequences Raises few political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the subject. Relates few important events and consequences
|
Demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the subject. Does not connect the various topics into a whole.
|
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the subject. Does not identify any cause and effect. |
|
3
20% |
Analysis of Regional Projects |
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the subject. Relates many of the important events and consequences Raises few political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. Makes excellent connections between identified issues and data (tables and charts). Several visuals are well placed and explained in the body of the paper. |
Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the subject. Relates some of the important events and consequences Raises few political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. Makes competent connections between identified issues and data (tables and charts). Several visuals are well placed and explained in the body of the paper. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the subject. Relates few of the important events and consequences Does not raise any secondary concerns. Makes few connections between identified issues and data (tables and charts).
|
Demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the subject Makes limited or inappropriate connections between identified issues and data (tables and charts).
|
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the subject. Makes no/very limited connections between identified issues and data (tables and charts).
|
|
20% |
Analysis of the Controversies regarding OBOR
|
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the various perspectives on OBOR. Raises several political and economic concerns about OBOR. |
Demonstrates competent understanding of the various perspectives on OBOR. Raises some political and economic concerns about OBOR. |
Demonstrates a somewhat understanding of the various perspectives on OBOR. Does not raise political and economic concerns about OBOR. |
Demonstrates limited understanding of the various perspectives on OBOR.
|
Fails to a coherent understanding of the various perspectives on OBOR. |
|
10% |
Conclusion on OBOR and Globalization |
Draws well thought out conclusions regarding OBOR and globalization. Connects the various topics into a whole paper.
|
Draws competent out conclusions regarding OBOR and globalization. Manages somewhat to coherently connect the various topics into a whole paper.
|
Draws limited out conclusions regarding OBOR and globalization. Struggles to connect the various topics into a whole paper.
|
Draws few well thought out conclusions regarding OBOR and globalization. Fails to connect the various topics into a whole paper.
|
Fails to draws well thought out conclusions regarding OBOR and globalization.
|
|
15% |
Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines
|
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; APA formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Individual contributions are seamlessly integrated. Organized by sections and subsections. Provides 5+ excellent research citations. |
Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still offers a clear presentation of ideas; Individual contributions to the paper are well organized through proper transitions. APA formatting is used. Insufficiently organized by sections/subsections. Limited research citations <5. Few References are from unreliable sources. |
Frequent grammar / spelling errors. Individual contributions to the paper are somewhat adequately organized, although limited effort is made to properly transition individual sections. Limited APA formatting. Insufficiently organized by sections/subsections. Limited research citations <3. References are poor quality |
Writing contains several grammatical errors; inadequate organization of the material. Individual contributions to the paper are not transitioned to create a holistic paper. APA formatting is minimally applied. Limited to no sections/subsections. Limited research citations <2 |
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines. No attempt is made to organize individual contributions into a complete paper. APA formatting is not used. No sections/subsections. No research citations |
