Assignment 3,Selection Process

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

25.0 %Detailed Description of Interview Process

There is no detailed description for the interview process.

A detailed description for the interview process is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.

A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.

A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observation conducted.

A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.

20.0 %Testing Options

There are no testing options included in the interview process.

Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.

One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.

Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.

Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.

25.0 %Interview Questions

There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.

The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage