Topic:
The purpose of this assessment is to further explore the hypothetical implementation of the recommended quality improvement initiative from Assignment 1.
This second assessment (presentation) will focus on the ‘how' aspects of the quality improvement initiative.
Students will be asked to develop an 8 - 10 minute professional, clear and visually appealing presentation with audible and articulate narration.
To focus your presentation, the hypothetical audience is the clinical manager(s) of the area in which you propose to implement the quality improvement initiative with the aim of demonstrating why the initiative is important and how you will assure its success, in order to gain the manager’s support.
In order to be successful in this assessment task students are required to:
· briefly summarise the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored (drawn from assignment 1);
· identify how implementation of your proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes;
· apply a quality improvement framework (for example the Plan, Do, Study, Act model) to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy;
· reflect on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discuss the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative; and
· appraise the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative.
Presentation guidelines:
This assignment is to be submitted in narrated presentation format (eg. narrated slides or video).
Presentation is to be professional, clear and visually appealing with audible and articulate narration and 8 – 10 minutes in length.
Formatting requirements include:
· Unit number, unit title, assignment title, student number, total time of the presentation submitted;
· Reference to resources used to support discussion mentioned within the presentation and / or provided in in-text format within the presentation; and
· Reference list provided formatted as per APA 7th edition requirements.
Rubric
Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Presentation
|
Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Presentation
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSummary of proposed Quality Improvement initiative.
Summarises the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored.
|
|
5 Pts
Comprehensive
clear and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored.
|
3.75 Pts
Very clear
and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored with minor error or omission.
|
3.25 Pts
Clear
and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored with some error or omission.
|
2.5 Pts
Adequate
summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored but lacks clarity or detail in some areas.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory:
Does not adequately summarise the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeImplementation plan.
Identifies how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
|
5 Pts
Excellent
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
3.75 Pts
Very good
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
3.25 Pts
Good
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
2.5 Pts
Adequate
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not adequately discuss how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeQuality Improvement framework.
Applies a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy.
|
|
10 Pts
Highly developed
application of a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy
|
7.5 Pts
Well developed
application of a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy
|
6.5 Pts
Adequately developed
application of a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy
|
5 Pts
Some application
Some application of a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy but lacks clarity development / detail
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not adequately apply a quality improvement framework to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClinical leadership and Change management.
Reflects on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discusses the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative.
|
|
10 Pts
Excellent
reflection on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discussion of the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative.
|
7.5 Pts
Very good
reflection on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discussion of the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative. May include minor error or omission.
|
6.5 Pts
Good
reflection on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discussion of the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative with some error or omission.
|
5 Pts
Adequate
reflection on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discussion of the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative but lacks clarity / development / detail.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not adequately discuss reflect on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and or discuss the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStrengths and limitations.
Appraises the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative.
|
|
10 Pts
Excellent
appraisal of the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative.
|
7.5 Pts
Very good
appraisal of the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative. May include minor error or omission.
|
6.5 Pts
Good
appraisal of the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative with some error or omission.
|
5 Pts
Adequate
appraisal of the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative but lacks clarity / development / detail.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not adequately appraise the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWriting and presentation.
Presentation professional, clear and visually appealing with audible and articulate narration. Formatting guidelines and time limit adhered to.
|
|
5 Pts
Excellent
presentation as per instructions: professional, clear and visually appealing with audible and articulate narration. Formatting guidelines and time limit adhered to.
|
3.75 Pts
Very good
presentation according to instructions: mostly professional, clear and visually appealing with audible and articulate narration with few errors. Minor editing and revision required. Time limit adhered to. May contain minor formatting error.
|
3.25 Pts
Good
presentation mostly according to instructions: some errors requiring moderate editing and revision. Time limit adhered to. May contain moderate formatting error.
|
2.5 Pts
Adequate
presentation however contains many minor errors requiring editing and revision. Time limit adhered to. May contain moderate formatting error.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory:
Not presented according to instructions and / or substantial presentation / formatting errors requiring major revision and / or time limit not adhered to.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeEvidence and referencing.
Relevant and contemporary literature resourced and utilised to support discussion.
Correct APA 7th referencing style.
|
|
5 Pts
Excellent
range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and integrated into discussion. Reference list provided as per APA 7th referencing style. No errors in referencing and no unreferenced claims.
|
3.75 Pts
Very good
range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and used well to support discussion. Reference list provided as per APA 7th referencing style with only minor errors in referencing.
|
3.25 Pts
Good
range of relevant and contemporary literature resourced and used to support discussion. Reference list provided mostly as per APA 7th referencing style with some errors in referencing.
|
2.5 Pts
Adequate
Adequate range of relevant, contemporary and appropriate literature resourced and used to support discussion. Quality of references may be questionable. Reference list provided as per APA 7th referencing style, but multiple errors in either in-text references and/or reference list.
|
0 Pts
Unsatisfactory
range of literature resourced and / or inappropriate literature resourced. Discussion not supported by literature / references lacking. Incorrect APA 7th referencing style .
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total points: 50
|
Nicole245
Assignment2homework.docx
