paper

PUP 301: Assignment 2 Grading Rubric—Comprehensive Plan Evaluation

B A

C K

G R

O U

N D

5 Points Provides a brief description of the selected city in a short introductory paragraph.

4 Points Provides a brief description of the selected city, but with some room for elaboration.

3 Points Somewhat provides a very brief description of the city, but with definite room for elaboration.

2 Points Only barely mentions a description of the city.

0 Points Does not adequately provide any description of the city.

P LA

N D

E S

C R

IP T

IO N

10 Points Provides a brief description of the plan itself, including 1) its time horizon, 2) how it was formulated, 3) how it was approved, and 4) an overview of its various components.

8 Points Provides a brief description of the plan itself, but with some room for elaboration and/or fails to discuss one of the four elements.

6 Points Somewhat provides a brief description of the plan itself, but with definite room for elaboration, and/or fails to discuss two of the four elements.

4 Points Barely provides a brief description of the plan itself, and/or only discusses one of the four elements. Extensive room for elaboration.

0 Points Does not adequately provide a brief description of the plan itself.

C R

IT IC

A L A

N A

LY S

IS

60 Points Critically analyzes how the plan presents 1) current & future conditions, 2) goals of plan and similarity to those discussed in class, 3) role of public participation, and 4) connection between plan components & goals.

48 Points Critically analyzes only three of the four discussion points, and/or with some room for elaboration.

36 Points Critically analyzes only two of the four discussion points, and/or with definite room for elaboration.

24 Points Critically analyses only one of the discussion points, and/or with extensive room for elaboration.

0 Points Does not adequately critically analyze any of the four discussion points.

E D

IT IN

G

15 Points No editing errors whatsoever.

12 Points Minimal proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.

9 Points Some proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.

6 Points Substantial proofing & editing and/or content revision needed.

0 Points Proofing and editing errors distracting and in need of significant correction.

C IT

A T

IO N

S

10 Points Link to plan included. Direct quotes used sparingly, and all sources are properly and consistently cited.

8 Points Link to plan included. Somewhat excessive use of (properly cited) direct quotes, or inconsistent citation style.

6 Points Link to plan included, but citations for direct quotes are missing in some cases.

4 Points Link to plan included, but citations are missing in many cases.

0 Points Does not include link to plan, and/or direct quotes used without any proper citation.