Diversity in America from Reconstruction through the 1920s
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
| Points: 120 | Assignment 1: Dealing with Diversity in America from Reconstruction through the 1920s |
||||
| Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
| 1. Clearly introduce your paper with your thesis. Weight: 10% | Poor or no introduction. No thesis statement used from those provided. | Insufficiently introduced your paper with your thesis statement. | Partially introduced your paper with your thesis statement. | Satisfactorily introduced your paper with your thesis statement; chosen from the list provided. | Thoroughly and clearly introduced your paper with your thesis statement chosen from the list provided. |
| 2. Discuss three specific examples from different decades (between 1865 and 1930) to support your thesis. Be persuasive and coherent with sound reasoning; have examples based on solid research. Weight: 30% | Did not submit or incompletely discussed three examples from the correct time period. The examples covered are not supported by research and reason. | Insufficiently discussed three examples from the right time frame. The examples might not all have clear relevance to the thesis or strong support from research and reason. | Partially discussed three examples from the proper time frame. The examples might not be as relevant or as well researched as they should be. | Satisfactorily discussed three clear examples from the proper time frame. Examples are based on good research and are relevant to the thesis. | Thoroughly and coherently discussed three clear examples from the proper time frame. The discussion is persuasive and with sound reasoning and good support. |
| 3. Explain clearly and persuasively why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be a weaker view. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely explained why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be a weaker view. | Insufficiently explained why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be the weaker view. The reasoning or examples might be flawed. | Partially explained why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be the weaker view. The reasoning or examples might be flawed. | Satisfactorily explained why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be the weaker view. | Thoroughly and clearly explained why the opposing view to yours would be in error or would be the weaker view. Used persuasive reasoning or clear examples. |
| 4. Discuss effectively the ways that the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession. Weight: 20% | Did not submit or incompletely discussed how the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession. | Insufficiently discussed how the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession. | Partially discussed how the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession | Satisfactorily discussed how the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession. | Thoroughly and effectively discussed how the history you have covered shapes or impacts issues in your workplace or desired profession. |
| 5. Used the MINIMUM of three references, drawing from the list provided. The class text is one of the sources used. References are listed at the end and matching in-text citations are used. Weight: 10% | No references provided. | Does not meet the required number of references; Insufficient on the reference list or in-text citations. . | Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices or not from the list provided. | Meets minimum number of required references; most references come from the list provided. | Meets at least the minimum number of required references; all references high quality choices. Sources are listed at the end and also cited in the body of the paper. Solid research is evident. |
| 6. Writing and Presentation: Used good grammar. Presentation shows clarity, reason, and critical thinking with proper writing mechanics. SWS format is used for reference entries, in-text citations, paper layout, and organization. Instructions followed. Weight: 10% | More than 8 errors present. | 7–8 errors. | 5–6 errors. | 3–4 errors. | 0–2 errors. |