Supplier Selection Report

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 3/9

Criteria Excellent Good Developing Needs Improvement Failing

Explanation

of how to

locate

reliable

suppliers

for high

volumes

Explanation

fo how to

assess

4 points

Identifies and details a clear process for identifying reliable

high volume suppliers. Process covers all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is

insightful and is supported by both class material and

case study facts. All reasoning behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and case study facts.

(3.6 - 4.0)

3.4 points

Identifies and details a process for

identifying reliable high volume

suppliers. Process covers most

all potential problems that may result if the

process is inadequate. One

major idea may be missing or

underdeveloped. Discussion is mostly

supported by both class material and

case study facts. Most reasoning

behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and case study facts.

(3.2 - 3.599)

3 points

Identifies and a process

for locating reliable high volume

suppliers. Process covers most all potential

problems that may result if the process is inadequate. Two

major ideas are underdeveloped.

Discussion is mostly supported

by both class material and case

study facts. Reasoning

while logical was not detailed enough

creating an overall impression of a

general understanding of the

process. (2.8 - 3.199)

2.6 points

Attempts to a process and or support and use of the case study facts was minimal leaving all discussion vague and underdeveloped .

(2.40 - 2.799)

0 points

Little to no attempt at making a

clear identification wa made.

(0 - 2.39)

3 points

Details specific ways to determine the

2.545 points

Mostly details specific ways to

2.245 points

Provides a general outline of a method

1.945 points

An attempt was made

to provide a method

0 points

No Identification or

discussion was

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 4/9

competance

of suppliers

to meet

company

standards

Determine

evaluative

criteria for

suppliers

once they

potential reliability of suppliers to meet

company standards. Discussed

identified criteria (method) and connects the

reasoning behind the choice of method

to all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is

insightful and is supported by both class material and

case study facts. All reasoning behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and case study facts.

(2.7-3.0)

determine the potential reliability of

suppliers to meet company

standards. Discussed identified criteria

(method) and connects the

reasoning behind the choice of method

to all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is clear an is supported by both class material

and case study facts. All reasoning

given behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and

case study facts but some parts of the

method discussion failed to

give reasoning. (2.4-2.69)

to determine the potential reliability of

suppliers to meet company

standards. Generally discusses identified

criteria (method) and connects the

reasoning behind the choice of method

to all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is clear but overbroad. All reasoning given

behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and

case study facts but because of the lack

of detail some reasoning was not always evident and

or supported. (2.1 - 2.39)

and discussion

however minimal

logical support and or

case study facts and

class material was used

to support the

conclusions presented;

discussion showed

minimal understanding

of the criteria needed to

select appropriate

suppliers.

(1.8 - 2.09)

offered or what was

provided was minima

and not supported b

class material or cas

study facts.

(0-1.79)

3 points

Details

specific evaluative

criteria for suppliers

to meet once

delivery has

begun. Discussed

2.545 points

.Mostly details specific evaluative

criteria for suppliers to meet once delivery

has begun. Discussed

2.245 points

Provides a general outline of evaluative criteria for suppliers

to meet once delivery has

begun. Generally

1.945 points

An attempt was made to provide criteria for

evaluation and discussion

however minimal logical support and or case

0 points

Little to no attempt was made to provide concrete evaluative criteria on supplier performance after delivery has begun.

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 5/9

begin to

deliver

Discussion

of multiple

suppliers

vs. long

term

contract

with one or

two

identified criteria

and connects the

reasoning behind

the choice of

method

to all potential

problems that may

result if the process

is inadequate.

Discussion is

insightful and is

supported by both

class material and

case study facts. All

reasoning behind

the conclusions is

logical and

supported by class

material and case

study facts.

(2.7 - 3.0)

identified criteria and connects the

reasoning behind the choice of method

to all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is clear an is supported by both class material

and case study facts. All reasoning

given behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and

case study facts but some criteria

discussion failed to give reasoning.

(2.4 - 2.69)

discusses identified criteria and connects the reasoning behind the choice of method

to all potential problems that may result if the process

is inadequate. Discussion is clear but overbroad. All reasoning given

behind the conclusions is logical

and supported by class material and

case study facts but because of the lack

of detail some reasoning was not always evident and

or supported. (2.1 - 2.39)

study facts and class material was used to

support the conclusions presented; discussion

showed minimal understanding of the

criteria needed to evaluate suppliers

performance. (1.8 - 2.09)

(0 - 1.79)

4 points

Comparison of buying from

multiple suppliers vs. buying on a long

term contract was discussed thoroughly. The

discussion explained both the strength and weaknesses of each

method of purchasing

completely and applied the idea to

3.4 points

Comparison of buying from multiple suppliers vs. buying on a long term contract was discussed completely. The discussion explained both the strength and weaknesses of each method of purchasing completely and applied the idea to

3 points

Comparison of buying from

multiple suppliers vs. buying on a long

term contract was discussed generally. The

discussion explained in general

terms both the strength and

weaknesses of each method of

purchasing.

2.6 points

An attempt was made

to compare the cost

benefits but the

discussion was minimal

and/or had no logical

support; discussion

showed minimal

understanding of

the concepts.

(2.4 - 2.799)

0 points

No comparison discussion was offere or what was provided was minimal and not supported by class

material or case stud facts

(0- 2.39)

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 6/9

Attention

to

Instructions

the case study insightfully and

comprehensively. Logic

used application of the concepts was supported from the class material, case

study facts and research material; discussion showed

an thorough understanding of use of both

methods. (3.6 - 4.0)

the case study. Logic used in application of the concepts was mostly supported by the class material, case study facts and research material; discussion showed a good understanding of comparison but application discussion was underdeveloped.

(3.2 - 3.599)

Application of the ideas to the case study was mostly reasoned logically

but the conclusions drawn needed more detail and support

from the class material, case study facts and research

material; discussion showed a

good understanding of comparison but

application discussion was

underdeveloped. (2.8 - 3.199)

2 points

The paper contains all major assignment

tasks. The paper also includes

completion of all minor aspects of the assignment such as

table creation if required, third person writing, required use of course material, outside sources if

needed, inclusion of page and paragraph number, no use of books, assignment

format and

1.7 points

The paper contains all major assignment

tasks. The paper missed one minor

aspects of the assignment such as

table creation if required, third person writing, required use of course material, outside sources if

needed, inclusion of page and paragraph number, no use of books, assignment

format and avoidance of using

direct quotes.

1.5 points

One major assignment

tasks or two minor aspects of the

assignment missed such as table

creation if required, third person writing,

required use of course material,

outside sources if needed, inclusion of page and paragraph number, no use of books, assignment

format and avoidance of using

direct quotes.

1.3 points

Two major assignment tasks and/or three

minor aspects of the assignments missed as

table creation if required, third person

writing, required use of course material, outside

sources if needed, inclusion of page and paragraph number, no

use of books, assignment format and

avoidance of using direct quotes. (1.2 - 1.399)

0 points

Three or more major assignment tasks

missed or more than three minor aspects o

the assignment missed such as table creation if required, third person writing,

required use of cours material, outside

sources if needed, inclusion of page and paragraph number, n

use of books, assignment format and avoidance of

using direct quotes. (0 - 1.199)

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 7/9

Writing

Mechanics

APA Style

(6th ed.)

avoidance of using direct quotes.

(1.8 - 2.0)

(1.60 - 1.799) (1.4 - 1.599)

2 points

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules

of written English using paragraphs

and sentence rather than bullets,

including but not limited to

capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing

or extra words, stylistic errors,

spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or

jargon used. Zero to two errors noted.

(1.8 - 2.0)

1.7 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of

mechanics: conventions of written English,

including capitalization,

punctuation, and spelling. Three to six

errors noted. (1.6 - 1.799)

1.5 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard

usage rules of mechanics:

conventions of English, including

capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Seven to 10 errors noted.

(1.4 - 1.599)

1.3 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions

of written English, including capitalization,

punctuation, and spelling. More than 10

errors found. (1.2 - 1.399)

0 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules

of mechanics: conventions of writte

English largely incomprehensible; o errors are too plentifu

to count. (0 -1.199)

2 points

One to 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper

citation of source material is used

throughout paper; Reference titles

follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a

colon and proper nouns capitalized

1.7 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors

noted or fails to use APA citations when

appropriate 1-2 times.

(1.6 -1.799)

1.5 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference lists; APA style errors are

noted throughout document with 5-6

errors noted; Fails to use APA citations

when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.

(1.4 - 1.599)

1.3 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA

citation when appropriate 5-6 times;

Fails to use APA citations when

appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a

total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference

0 points

No attempt at APA style; or attempts

either in-text citations or reference list but

omits the other. (0 - 1.199)

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 8/9

Add a File Record Audio

Total / 20

Overall Score

Submit Assignment

Files to submit

(0) file(s) to submit

After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

Comments

nouns capitalized. (1.8 - 2.0)

citations and reference list in a paper

when requires APA citations are needed

throughout the document. (1.2 -1.399)

Excellent 18 points minimum

Good 16 points minimum

Developing 14 points minimum

Needs Improvement 12 points minimum

Failing 0 points minimum

1/31/2020 Assignment #1: Supplier Selection Report - BMGT 375 6380 Purchasing Management (2202) - UMGC Learning Management System

https://learn.umuc.edu/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=921355&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=487048 9/9

Paragraph Font Family

Font Size

Submit Cancel