From: wwarf@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Wayne J. Warf)
Subject: Re: Your Evil Tax Dollars at Work, was RE: ATF BURNS RANCH ETC ETC...
Nntp-Posting-Host: silver.ucs.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University
Lines: 72

In article <93112.230800MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> Mark 'Mark' Sachs <MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> writes:
>In article <93112.153005MGB@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>,
><MGB@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> says:
>>From A.P. :  According to numerous accounts by those in the compound,
>>the fire was started by an armoured vehicle crushing a large propane
>>tank, and turning over numerous gas lanterns.
>
>Oh? Then why did the smoke and flames start from three different places?
>In particular, three different places where there were no APV's?
>
And just where is the evidence for this? FBI sayso. The Texas Medical
Examiner refuted 2 of their lies today.


>And if the government did start the fire, then why weren't people trying
>to get out of the compound?

Let me put you in a building, pump in CS, knock the walls down around
you and see how fast you find an exit.

>And besides... oh, I don't know why I'm even bothering.
>
I don't know why either, you're willing to swallow everything fed you.
Good boy.

>>I find it tremendously chilling that so many people seem willing to accept
>>the governments story, despite much evidence to the contrary.
>
>I find it tremendously chilling that so many people seem eager to believe
>a murderous, heavily-armed religious cult, despite much evidence to the
>contrary. Thought Experiment: Suppose this exact same thing happened under
>the Bush administration. What would your answer be then? Would you still
>prefer to believe the cultists?

Oh a Clinton apologist, why didn't you *say* so.

>(No, I don't really expect a response to that challenge.)
>
>>But then
>>again, that is how Mr. Clinton was elected, by people who believe that
>>his campaign promisses would be respected by him once he got into office.
>
>Um, isn't that how all politicians are elected?
>
>>If people will believe that of any politican, it is little wonder they
>>will believe all of the factoids being given out as fact by the
>>Clinton/Reno/FBI/BATF confederation.
>
>So is there any particular reason the gummint decided to slaughter eighty
>people? Are they, like, just plain evil, or what? Did they just wake up
>one day, stretch and yawn, and throw a dart at a map of the United States
>to figure out who to oppress that day? I'm eager to know.

The kgBATF was expecting a quick victory while the cameras rolled,
however, they were the only ones with a script.

>And does Bill Clinton have cooler theme music than Darth Vader? How is he
>on diabolical laughter? Does he look good in a cape? These things MUST be
>investigated. You first.

Hey, you're the apologist, *you* tell us.

>   "...so I propose that we destroy the moon, neatly solving that problem."
>[Your blood pressure just went up.]        Mark Sachs IS: mbs110@psuvm.psu.edu
>   DISCLAIMER: If PSU knew I had opinions, they'd try to charge me for them.


-- 
 +   Wayne J. Warf -- WWARF@ucs.indiana.edu -- I speak for myself only   +
 |*Clinton*Gore*CIA*FBI*DEA*Assassinate*Bomb*WoD*BoR*ATF*IRS*Resist*NSA* |
 |*Christian*God*Satan*Apocalypse*ZOG*Nazi*Socialist*Communist*Explosive*|
 +*fundamentalist*revolution*NSC*Federal Reserve*Constitution*gold*FEMA* +
