From: aas7@po.CWRU.Edu (Andrew A. Spencer)
Subject: Re: MR2 - noisy engine.
Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
Lines: 22
Reply-To: aas7@po.CWRU.Edu (Andrew A. Spencer)
NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu


In a previous article, aas7@po.CWRU.Edu (Andrew A. Spencer) says:

>
>In a previous article, eliot@lanmola.engr.washington.edu (eliot) says:
>
>>In article <1r1vofINN871@usenet.pa.dec.com> tomacj@opco.enet.dec.com (THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO !!!) writes:
>nice theory.  too bad the MR2's never came with a four cylinder over 2.0
>liters.  More like 1.6.  Or did they? were the nonturbo MR2II's  2.2 or
>some such?

let me clarify, i think they both are 2.0 litres.

>I also understand that anyone using balancing shafts on four cylinders, must
>pay SAAB a royalty for using their patented design..like Porsche's 3.0 I4...

i was already corrected on this, and believe i may have been in errror, that
it is actually MISTUBISHI. 
apologies for butting into the thread.
>c ya
>DREW

