Third String in Reverse Order
mello 
Assignment.pdf
10/10/2019 Module 5: Critical Thinking
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/13694/assignments/268137 1/3
ITS320 Module 5 Critical Thinking
Option #2: Third String in Reverse Order Assignment Instructions
Write a Python function that will accept as input three string values from a user. The method will return to the user a concatenation of the first two strings and will print the third string in reverse order. The function is to be called from the main method. In the main method, prompt the user for the three strings.
Assignment Submission Instructions
Submit a text file containing your Python code into the Module 5 drop box. Name your file ITS320_CTA5.Option2.py.
10/10/2019 Module 5: Critical Thinking
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/13694/assignments/268137 2/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
Requirements 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment, including the submission of the text file that contains your Python code in Option 1 OR Option 2.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Content 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of creating a Python function of string values in reverse order OR third string in reverse order; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
Problem Solving
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in problem solving.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate problem solving.
Critical Thinking
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking in working through the coding process.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.
10/10/2019 Module 5: Critical Thinking
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/13694/assignments/268137 3/3
Criteria Ratings Pts
10.0 pts
10.0 pts
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
Demonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project and/or questions contain proper APA formatting, according to the CSU- Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
