Order #340739 Topic: RESEARCH ON PICO QUESTION
tutorthammy
ASSIGNMENT-_Final_Paper_-_Part_One__Draft_--do_not_put_your_name_on_it_-_Copy.docxASSIGNMENT: Final Paper - Part One (Draft)--do not put your name on it This is Part One of a two-part assignment. This project is designed to apply your knowledge of EBP to an area of healthcare you’d like to know more about. E.g., What are the most effective dietary interventions for treating pre-diabetes in older adults? Objectives 1. Find and evaluate the current best evidence 2. Identify and apply evidence that relates to health promotion and disease prevention Directions--do NOT put your name on this draft! We want this to be a 'blind review' so you should not put your name there. Students will submit the draft version of a 3-5 page, double-spaced "mini literature review" paper on their PICO topic. The paper should critically appraise and synthesize the results of at least three original, peer-reviewed research articles. Other sources of information should also be cited throughout the paper as appropriate (e.g. background section of your article). Additional sources may include other original research articles or secondary sources of information, such as credible web-sites and review or meta-analysis articles. The goal of submitting a draft is for the opportunity to receive peer and instructor feedback before submitting your final paper. Due Dates Students will turn in a draft of their paper on Friday, Nov 16th by 11:59 p.m. Students will provide peer feedback by Wednesday, Nov 21st at 11:59 p.m. The instructor will hand back the drafts with feedback by Sunday, Nov 25th. The final paper is due on Thurs, Dec 6 by 11:59 p.m. Papers should include the following (See Scientific Writing Tips PPT/lecture for further guidancePreview the document): Background/problem statement (use the outline you made for a previous weekly assignment to help you develop this!)
What should the reader know about your topic before you focus on your specific question and the available evidence?
Significance of your topic - why is your research question important? Purpose statement – should include components of your PICO question and inform the reader what the rest of the paper will focus on. E.g., The purpose of this paper is to determine the most effective dietary interventions for treating pre-diabetes in older adults.
Methods Describe the search strategies you used to locate the evidence. Consider factors such as the database, key words, filters, and exclusion/inclusion criteria.
Results & Discussion - evidence/discussion of the strength of the evidence This is a summary of the evidence and evaluation of the strength of the evidence. The type of evidence should be appropriate based on your research question. For example, experimental studies would be the most useful for treatment/therapy questions.
Summarize each of the original research articles, describing key strengths and weaknesses of the studies as well as pertinent study results. Compare and contrast the research. If the evidence is conflicting, discuss possible reasons for this.
Conclusion Based on your appraisal of the research, how well does the scientific literature address your research question and what can you conclude? Also consider factors such as generalizability and whether there are implications for clinical practice.
References At least 3 peer-reviewed original research articles should be included in your appraisal. Include other credible sources of information as appropriate (e.g., to provide background information on your topic at the beginning).
Use APA style , professionalism, in-text citation, sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation
What to Include Microsoft Word formatted draft paper with items as listed above
Resources APA Style Guide Center for Study and Teaching of Writing
PICO topic Scientific Writing Tips PPTPreview the document Final Paper & Presentation Assignment InstructionsPreview the document
BELOW IS MY WORK I PAID 1 WRITING SERVICE TO DO WHICH WAS NOT WORTH IT AND I HAD A LOWER GRADE. THERE YOU WILL FIND MY PICO QUESTION SOMETHING ABOUT THERAPY. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION AND DONT WRITE LIKE THIS PAST WRITER.
Therapy is designed to improve perception, memory, attention, learning, judgment, and planning of a person. For this reason, therapy becomes more effective in improving patient's recovery when focused on cognitive rehabilitation than on physical rehabilitation of patients. A traumatic brain injured patient will benefit more from therapy than a patient who has physical injuries.
Purpose statement: The paper sought to determine whether therapy in traumatic brain injured patients is more effective on cognitive rehabilitation than physical rehabilitation in improving patient's recovery (Callender et al., 2017).
The research question is important because the information that will be acquired through it will provide complementary insight into the wealth of knowledge that exists in health care and public health. Additionally, through this research, significant discoveries and the development of new therapies may resurface thus having an enormous effect on the field of medicine and human health.
The results showed that therapy is more effective in patients who require cognitive rehabilitation than in those who need physical rehabilitation. The results are reliable to a greater degree because there were comparison and complementary between qualitative and quantitative approaches of research. However, the main weakness was trying to objectively determine the cause and effect relationship between different variables (Guillamondegui et al., 2011).
In conclusion, the findings of the research are in agreement with the scientific literature already in existence. The research qualifies to be used as a reference point in case one wants to explore more on the same topic. Additionally, the findings contribute to the wealth of knowledge in clinical practice.
References
Bowling, A. (2014). Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Callender, L., Brown, R., Driver, S., Dahdah, M., Collinsworth, A., & Shafi, S. (2017). Process for developing rehabilitation practice recommendations for individuals with traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurology, 17(1), 54.
Guillamondegui, O. D., Montgomery, S. A., Phibbs, F. T., McPheeters, M. L., Alexander, P. T., Jerome, R. N., ... & Salomon, R. M. (2011). Traumatic brain injury and depression.
Horn, S. D., Corrigan, J. D., Bogner, J., Hammond, F. M., Seel, R. T., Smout, R. J., ... & Whiteneck, G. G. (2015). Traumatic Brain Injury–Practice-Based Evidence study: design and patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 96(8), S178-S196.
BELOW ARE THE COMMENTS FROM MY PROFESSOR REGARDING MY FIRST WORK.
Comments: comments by DBH Gracy This paper is not an evidence based process and in fact, i'm not certain what you are actually trying to determine here. You need significant re-write of this work. This is supposed to be a 3-5 page paper to use the literature to answer a clinical question. questions: 1. what is your actual PICO question? It seems to be asking if Cognitive therapies improve recovery for TBI patients more than physical therapies, is that right? questions are: recovery of what exactly? are you asking if patients with TBI will make greater changes with cognitive therapy? you need to define TBI and then give info for what is typically done for them. THEN say what those cognitive therapies are and what those outcomes include when those therapies are done. THEN go find 3 studies where someone tested cognitive therapies versus physical therapies and write a brief description of what they did and what they found. also write your methods for finding those studies......how you searched the literature and what terms u used..... if you need my help further, you need to either get on the phone with me or come to my office if you are on campus. this paper needs significant help but you have time to attend to it. let me know what you will be doing so that i can assist you.
