METHODS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

profileXavierDz
Assignment.docx

Assignment

METHODS USED IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

In order to achieve credible and trustworthy results from qualitative studies, the methodology must be designed very carefully. That is, you must consider the process of conducting qualitative research to address your research question. Important considerations include selecting the research question, collecting data, engaging in data analysis and management, and selecting appropriate interpretive techniques.

For this Assignment, be sure to view this week’s Qualitative Research Design PowerPoint webinar and pay close attention to its content on the basic elements of qualitative research methods (e.g., sample selection, data collection, plans for interpretive analysis). Then, review the two research studies presented in this week’s resources for this assignment.

Note : While not a required resource, you might find the definitions in the Encyclopedia of Nursing Research helpful for this assignment.

This assignment involves identifying and describing different elements of the research method used in the Tobiano, Ting, Ryan, Jenkinson, Scott, & Marshall (2019) article.

· Focus on the research design, sample selection, data collection methods, and plan for data analysis as discussed in the Tobiano, Ting, Ryan, Jenkinson, Scott, & Marshall (2019) article.

· Identify at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the article’s research method based on trustworthiness. You must provide support for your explanation with citations from additional sources.

· Use the Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research located in this week’s resources. Note: Assignments will not be accepted unless the required template is used.

· The template includes an area for each element discussed in the study.

· Be brief, paraphrase and summarize each of the elements clearly on the form.

RESOURCES

· Tobiano, G., Ting, C., Ryan, C., Jenkinson, K., Scott, L., & Marshall, A.P. (2019).  Front-line nurses’ perceptions of intra-hospital handover Links to an external site. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29, 2231–2238. http://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15214

Once this is complete, save your file and submit the Journal Club Template for Qualitative Research to the submission link. Note that you must use the template provided.

NURS_3150_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_3150_Week_4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Design

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the research design with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed discussion of the research design with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed discussion of the research design with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed discussion of the research design with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample Selection

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed explanation of the sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Methods

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed explanation of the data collection methods with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan for Data Analysis

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 to >10.0 pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed explanation of the plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and describes the strengths and weaknesses of the research method used based on the elements of trustworthiness.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Student provided a fully developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

22 to >19.0 pts

Proficient

Student provided a developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

19 to >17.0 pts

Basic

Student provided a minimally developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

17 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provided an under-developed discussion of at least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the elements of trustworthiness.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient

Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Basic

Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient

Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

3.5 to >2.0 pts

Basic

Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

2 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Attributions and Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1" margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors in the template provided.

4 to >3.5 pts

Proficient

Demonstrates developed APA formatting with few formatting errors in the template provided.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Basic

Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors in the template provided.

3 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors or fails to use the template provided.

5 pts

Total Points: 100