Assigment 2
PADM 620
Assignment 2: Statesmanship and Ethics Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Analysis of Material |
32 to 35 points All elements of the assigned topic are clearly and completely addressed in light of 5–7-page requirement. Analyses flow in a logical and effective manner, address all elements of the assignment thoroughly, and reach the nuances of the issues raised. Complex issues are navigated with precision, clarity, and detail. |
29 to 31 points Major elements of the assigned topic are discussed in a meaningful way, but the paper would benefit from additional clarity, depth, or detail. Analyses are generally well constructed and complex issues are recognized. |
1 to 28 points Some elements of the assigned topic are mentioned, but the discussion is incomplete, unclear, superficial, or otherwise does not meet expectations. Analyses are general and lacking in depth. Complex issues and nuances are overlooked. |
0 points Assigned elements are not discussed. |
|
|
Organization |
32 to 35 points The paper is focused and well organized. The paper has a clear thesis, and a clear and substantive introduction and conclusion. The paper effectively uses headings and subheadings, as appropriate, to focus and deepen analyses. |
29 to 31 points The paper is reasonably well organized and follows a logical path from idea to idea and section to section. The paper includes an adequate introduction and conclusion. |
1 to 28 points The paper is in need of additional organization and clarity. Ideas and/or sections of the paper either do not flow logically, or are in need of fundamental improvement. The paper is lacking an adequate introduction and/or conclusion. |
0 points The paper lacks an introduction, conclusion, and meaningful organization. |
|
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Evaluation, Synthesis, and Adequate Use of Sources |
32 to 35 points Sources, concepts and ideas are evaluated critically and synthesized in a manner that moves beyond restatement and makes a valuable contribution to the assigned topic. |
29 to 31 points Sources are used correctly and support the paper’s analyses and conclusions. Concepts and ideas are understood and linked in a reasonable way that supports the paper’s conclusions. Paper reflects a good familiarity with the major ideas, but would benefit from greater critical evaluation and synthesis. |
1 to 28 points Some sources are used, but are not critically evaluated and/or are not used in an effective manner. Paper would benefit from a more substantive use of sources, more appropriate reliance on sources, and/or better skill in evaluating, synthesizing, or applying ideas, concepts, or sources. |
0 points Sources are not used; ideas and concepts from sources are not evaluated or synthesized. |
|
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Mechanics |
14 to 15 points No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing is precise and word choice is appropriate. |
12 to 13 points Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is sufficient and word choice is adequate. |
1 to 11 points Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good. |
0 points Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors are present. Writing style is difficult to understand and word choice is poor. |
|
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not Present |
Points Earned |
|
Current APA Format Elements |
14 to 15 points Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, bibliography, etc. are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. |
12 to 13 points Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, bibliography, etc. are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font. |
1 to 11 points Citations and format are in current APA style, though several errors are present. Cover page, bibliography, etc., are included, though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or font are incorrect. |
0 points Citations are not formatted correctly. Cover page, bibliography, etc. are not included or formatted incorrectly. Paper is not double-spaced, margins are incorrect, or font is incorrect. |
|
|
Research Elements |
14 to 15 points At least 4–7 high quality primary and secondary sources are utilized in a mature and effective manner. Research effectively incorporates multiple nuanced viewpoints of complex issues. Adequate number of sources (per assignment instructions) are used. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are correctly and effectively supported by research. |
12 to 13 points Primary and secondary sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research reflects multiple viewpoints of complex issues. Adequate number of sources (Per assignment instructions) are used. A complete and accurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are acceptably supported by research. |
1 to 11 points Fewer than the 4 sources of acceptable and appropriate nature and quality are utilized. Research does not reflect multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate bibliography is provided. Arguments are tangentially supported with research. Arguments incorporate research but often include or rely upon personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are used inappropriately at times. |
0 points Appropriate sources are not used, or sources are lacking entirely. Arguments are not supported by research. Opposing viewpoints are dismissed or ignored. Bibliography is incomplete or missing. |
|
|
Total |
/150 |
Instructor’s Comments:
Page 1 of 3