assignment
nova_alj
assignmebt_guide.pdf
Assignment Rubric
Elements Criteria Score
1. Challenge
The submission provides a detailed description of the author’s
challenge including all relevant information
3
The submission describes the author’s challenge including
some information
2
The submission does not sufficiently describe the author’s
challenge
1
Feedback The submission’s challenge description could be improved by... NA
2. Selection
The submission provides a detailed description of the selected
tool including all relevant information (e.g., what it is and why
the author selected it for his/her challenge -- including any
appropriate video lecture references)
3
The submission describes the selected tool including some
information (e.g., what it is and why the author selected it for
his/her challenge -- including any appropriate video lecture
references)
2
The submission does not sufficiently describe the selected tool 1
Feedback The submission’s tool selection description could be improved
by...
NA
3. Application The submission provides a detailed description of applying the
selected tool including all relevant information (e.g., what the
author did and how the tool was applied
effectively/ineffectively)
3
The submission describes applying the selected tool including
some information (e.g., what the author did and how the tool
was applied effectively/ineffectively)
2
The submission does not sufficiently describe applying the
selected tool
1
Feedback The submission’s tool application description could be
improved by...
NA
4. Insight The submission provides a detailed description of the insight
gained including all relevant information (e.g., how an insight
affected the author’s thinking about his/her challenge and
about design thinking more broadly)
3
The submission describes the insight gained by including some
information (e.g., how an insight affected the author’s thinking
about his/her challenge and about design thinking more
broadly)
2
The submission does not sufficiently describe the insight
gained by the author
1
Feedback The submission’s insight description could be improved by... NA
5. Approach The submission provides a detailed description of an
alternative approach including all relevant information (e.g.,
applying the same selected tool or a different one and the
reason(s) why)
3
The submission describes an alternative approach including
some information (e.g., applying the same selected tool or a
different one and the reason(s) why)
2
The submission does not sufficiently describe an alternative
approach
1
Feedback The submission’s approach description could be improved by... NA
6. Organization The submission is clear, compelling, and succinct; descriptions
flow logically
3
The submission is an appropriate length; some descriptions are
unclear or do not flow logically
2
The submission is either underdeveloped or overly wordy; 1
descriptions are unclear or difficult to follow
Feedback The submission’s overall organization could be improved by... NA
7. Additional
Feedback
While reviewing this submission, I was inspired by... NA
