• Choose two health resource/education websites that you might recommend to patients

assignementweek3.docx

Home >Nursing homework help >• Choose two health resource/education websites that you might recommend to patients

Instructions

Not all websites are created equal. When recommending a health resource/education website to patients, you must make sure that the website is reliable and addresses the issues correctly. This assignment will assist you in determining whether a website is one you would recommend.

In this assignment you will have an opportunity to evaluate a health resource/education website according to website evaluation standards.

Using the attached Evaluating Websites Checklist downloadto complete the following:

· Choose two health resource/education websites that you might recommend to patients.

· To assist you in evaluating the websites, please refer to the information below:

· Accuracy

· Authority

· Objectivity

· Currency

· Coverage

· Audience

· Write a summary comparison of the two websites. Be sure to include your recommendations for the websites as they relate to patient education.

· This is not a formal paper. You only need to submit your two checklists and your summary.

Due

Sunday by 11:59 p.m. ET

Assignment Guidelines and Rubric

· This Assignment is worth 60 points

· Review the Assignment Rubric for more details on grading.

· Make sure your assignment does not contain any grammatical errors.

Submission Guidelines

Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. For the title of this Word document, use your last name first, then “Module3_Assignment” (example: Smith_Module3_ Assignment).

For additional help, see How to Submit Assignments in Canvas .

Rubric

Module 3 Assignment Rubric

Module 3 Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The assignment thoroughly addresses the question(s) or topic. Content is exceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, and supported with specific evidence, facts,and examples.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good

The assignment adequately addresses the question(s) or topic. Content is well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed and supported with general evidence, facts and details.

16 to >14.0 pts

Satisfactory

The post minimally addresses the question(s) or topic. Content is presented, but ideas are not well developed or supported. Some evidence or facts are presented, but are more general or less specific.

14 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The assignment does not addresses the question(s) or topic. Ideas are not clearly presented and not supported with evidence or facts.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is well-organized and easy for a reader to follow.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good

Writing reflects some organization but is not easily followed by a reader.

16 to >14.0 pts

Satisfactory

Writing is not effectively organized and is difficult for a reader to follow.

14 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Writing is disorganized and is difficult for a reader to follow.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWebsite Analysis Checklist

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Exceptionally evaluated websites for Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, and Audience and included a detailed comparison.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Sufficiently evaluated websites for Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, and Audience and included an appropriate comparison.

8 to >7.0 pts

Satisfactory

Minimally evaluated websites for Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, and Audience and included an satisfactory comparison.

7 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Did not evaluate websites for Accuracy, Authority, Objectivity, Currency, Coverage, and Audience and/or did not included an appropriate comparison.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics: grammar, punctuation and style

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Writing reflects no grammatical, punctuation or style errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Writing reflects 1-3 grammatical, punctuation or style errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Satisfactory

Writing reflects 4-6 grammatical, punctuation or style errors.

7 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Writing reflects more than 6 grammatical punctuation or style errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 60