ASSGN 2 WEEK 4

Jlm1128

ASSGN2WK4RUBRIC.docx

Home >Applied Sciences homework help >ASSGN 2 WEEK 4

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed....The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the project proposed....The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response topics are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why....The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why....The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts