|
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes the selected medication and explains the selection, dosing, and necessary patient education.
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response clearly describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection, dosing, and patient education information.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that does not describe the selected medication, dosing, and patient education information, or some or all are missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the selection, dosing, and patient education information, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribes any necessary labs or diagnostics needed prior to prescribing, as well as how side effects and efficacy will be monitored.
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response comprehensively and clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the descriptions.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response clearly describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response clearly describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the descriptions.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the descriptions.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes needed labs and other diagnostics, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes monitoring of efficacy and side effects, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the descriptions, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome20
Explains why the other medications are not appropriate
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The response comprehensively and fully details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response clearly details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanation.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely details why other medications are not appropriate. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanation.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support why other medications are not appropriate, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides any additional collaboration or education necessary for the patient. Discussion includes: what would be needed to include in the assessment for a patient who may become nonadherent with the prescribing plan. Discussion includes what are alternative treatment solutions based upon assessment. Describes a new treatment plan based upon these factors.
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The response accurately and clearly provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples the information.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Good
The response accurately provides all additional necessary information. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the information.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely provides all additional necessary information. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the information.
|
10 to >0 pts
Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides all additional necessary information, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the information, or it is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.
|
|
10 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided, which delineates all required criteria. Writes succinctly 4–5 page paper.
|
7 to >4.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Writes succinctly 4–7 page paper.
|
4 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the Assignment is vague or off topic. Writes succinctly 8–9 page paper.
|
1 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Does not write succinctly 10+ page paper.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5
Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
1 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
format with no errors. Contains a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a one or two APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 3-4 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.
|
3 to >1.0 pts
Fair
Contains three or four APA format errors. Contains a minimum of 1-2 peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.
|
1 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains five or more APA format errors. Contains no peer-reviewed, evidence-based scholarly references outside of course resources.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
doglover28
assgn1wk10rubric.docx
