The purpose of this assessment is to discuss and analyze your leadership development based on the Kouzes and Posner (2017) model.
rajanghi
Assessmenttask3.docxAssessment task 3
5 | P a g e
Assessment Rubric: Assessment Task 3
|
Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
|
Knowledge and application of Kouzes and Posner (2017) leadership to personal example 25% |
• Demonstrates insight and awareness of the deeper subtler aspects of the application of K&P Practices and Commitments to personal leadership example. • Articulate academic writing skills, highly coherent and logical flow of ideas. Exemplary spelling, grammar, and syntax. |
• Evidence of an awareness and understanding of deeper and more subtle aspects of the K&P Practices and Commitments to the leadership example is shown. There is evidence of originality and independent thought. • Fluent communication of information. Superior academic writing skills. Minimal errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. |
• A high level of understanding and application of K&P Practices and Commitments is communicated to the reader. • Academic writing is fluent and relevant, clear and/or cohesive. |
• Simple leadership example provided with K&P Practices and Commitments referred to but not used to guide analysis. • Evidence of academic writing noted but has minor errors in spelling, grammar and style. Not always relevant, clear and/or concise. |
• Example from practice missing or inappropriate and/or K&P Practices and Commitments not referred to or poorly applied. • Elementary style of writing. Basic use of language. |
|
Development of leadership abilities 20% |
• Development of own leadership abilities is critically discussed. • Clear and concise exploration of the K&P Practices and Commitments is identified. |
• Clearly expresses strategies for development of personal leadership abilities. • Relationship with K&P Practices and Commitments are evidently linked with the majority being clearly articulated. |
• Strategies for development of leadership abilities noted clearly. • Relationship with K&P Practices and Commitments addressed with satisfactory justification. |
• Development of leadership abilities is simplistically conveyed. • There is partial relationship between personal development and K&P Practices and Commitments but not all are considered. |
• Development of leadership abilities not evident and/or not discussed with relation to K&P Practices and Commitments. |
|
Application of leadership theory - creative work 25% |
• An outstanding visual presentation demonstrating creativity and imagination. • Deep and insightful understanding as to how future leadership will be developed is evident. |
• There is evidence of a superior level of imagination and creativity presented in the visual presentation. • Application to personal development clearly evident. |
• There is evidence of a high level of creativity and imagination presented. • Clear links to future leadership development are made. |
• There is satisfactory imagination and effort evident in the creative presentation. • Links to future development present. |
• Creative representation is not presented imaginatively and/or there is no effort in using creativity to demonstrate leadership development. • Links to leadership development poor or absent. |
|
Analysis 20% |
• Analysis and synthesis of K&P Principles and personal example are integrated with literature and strongly linked to personal leadership development and abilities. • Eloquent academic writing skills with main subject matter developed within each paragraph. |
• There is a well-developed analysis of K&P Principles and personal example. Evidence of a deep awareness of the subtle aspects of leadership development and abilities are well drawn. • Evidence of superior academic writing skills with discussion in each paragraph providing sufficient depth to ensure reflection is meaningfully. |
• K&P principles and personal example are analysed and there is evidence of evaluation and syntheses of ideas in terms of related literature for leadership development. • Evidence of fluent academic writing skills with discussion in majority of paragraphs providing broad depth to reflection. |
• There is attempt at analysis but integration of both K&P principles and personal example is limited in terms of leadership development. • Evidence of appropriate academic writing skills with some depth to personal reflection. |
• Poor or absent analysis and syntheses of the K&P principles and /or personal example. |
6 | P a g e
|
Literature Sources & referencing 10% |
• Extensive use of the subject key text and relevant literature. Multiple citations used to support single ideas. • References are accurate and comply with UOW referencing guideline for APA. |
• The subject key text and broad range of high-quality papers are used frequently to support ideas. • APA referencing style is consistently accurate. Minor, infrequent referencing errors noted. |
• Body of assessment uses at least 5 reverent primary research literatures including the subject key text. • APA referencing style is accurate. Minor, but frequent referencing errors noted. |
• Primarily reliance on subject key text with minimal other supported literature used. • APA evident but multiple errors noted. |
• Shows little/no evidence of subject key text and supportive literature. Relies primarily on non-reviewed and/or internet sources. • APA not evident and/or major and multiple referencing errors. |
