Sustainability and Ethics

Assessment Task

Weighting

Due

Length

ULO

Assessment 1: Academic Essay (Individual)

30%

Week 3

1500 words

ULO-1

Students need to provide an Academic Essay on a

ULO-2

given topic by the lecturer

Due date:

Week 3

Group/individual:

Individual assessment

Word count:

1,500

Weighting:

30%

Unit learning outcomes:

[ULO1], [ULO2]

Course Learning Outcomes:

[CLO1], [CLO4], [CLO7]

Graduate Attributes:

GA-3, GA-4, GA-5

Not satisfactory

Satisfactory

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Marking Criteria

(0-49%) of the

(50-64%) of

(65-74%) of

(75-84%) of the

(85-100%) of the

criterion

the criterion

the criterion

criterion mark

criterion mark

mark)

mark

mark

Demonstrate

Inadequate

Basic

Exhibits

Exhibits

Displays exceptional

relevancy of

understanding

knowledge

breadth and

accurate and

ability in and

ethics for

of ethics for

of ethics for

depth of

detailed

understanding of

business

business

business

understanding

breadth and

ethics for business

decisions –

decisions –

decisions –

of ethics for

depth of

decisions – literature

literature review

literature

literature

business

understanding

review and

and discussion

review and

review and

decisions –

of ethics for

discussion

(30%)

discussion

discussion

business

literature

decisions –

review and

literature

discussion

review and

discussion

Demonstrate

Inadequate

Basic

Exhibits

Exhibits

Displays exceptional

how ethics is

understanding

knowledge

breadth and

accurate and

ability in and

relevant for

of ethics for

of ethics for

depth of

detailed

understanding of

business

business

business

understanding

breadth and

ethics for business

decisions in a

decisions –

decisions –

of ethics for

depth of

decisions – literature

chosen topic

literature

literature

understanding

business

review and

(30%)

review and

review and

g of ethics

decisions –

discussion

discussion

discussion

for business

literature

decisions –

review and

literature

discussion

review and

discussion

Demonstrate an

Inadequate

Basic

Exhibits breadth

Exhibits accurate

Displays exceptional

understanding of

understanding

knowledge of

and depth of

and detailed

ability in and

ethics issues and

of ethics issues

understanding

understanding

breadth and

understanding of

capability of

and incapable

of ethics

of ethics issues

depth of

ethics issues and

apply theories

of applying

issues and lack

and capable of

understanding of

high capability of

into practices

theories into

of theory

applying some

ethics issues and

applying theories

(30%)

practices

application

basic theories

capable of

into practices

into practices

applying theories

into practices

sufficiently

Demonstrate

Poor academic

Satisfactory

Good academic

Excellent writing

Exceptional academic

capability of

writing skills

writing skills

writing skills

skills without

writing skills.

academic writing

with grammar

with grammar

with minor

grammar and

Professional

skills (grammar,

and spelling

and spelling

grammar and

spelling errors.

presentation

spelling,

errors. Poor

errors. Poor

spelling errors.

Excellent

structure following

presentation

presentation and

presentation

Clear

presentation

Harvard referencing

referencing)

structure and

structure and

presentation

structure

style

failed to follow

(10%)

failed to

structure

following Harvard

Harvard

follow Harvard

following

referencing style.

referencing

referencing

Harvard

style

style

referencing style