Read the following documents carefully prior start your research and writing: • Assessment requirements and Detailed instructions for completing the task; • Assessment Task 1 Workbook Mr Dwight; and • Dwight First Hour Simulation Medical Documents Note: W

This document contains:

• Assessment requirements.

• Detailed instructions for completing the task.

BB233 Integrated Nursing Practice

Assessment Task 1

Assessment name: Collaborative Practice Simulation Workbook

Task description: You will be expected to complete the simulation ensuring demonstration of evidence-based practice, clinical reasoning and decision-making to provide culturally safe, quality, person- centred care, while considering a multi-disciplinary approach to care. You will need to analyse the simulation and undertake a holistic understanding of the situation drawing on prior knowledge and skills. In this simulation you will be expected to use and understand the requirements for integrated knowledge and skills, including communication, collaboration, leadership, ethical and culturally safe approaches to healthcare, and interprofessional collaboration. Once you have completed the simulation, you will be required to complete the National Health Priority module on Cancer Control, search the literature for further information and complete the case-based scenario workbook questions.

What you need to do: 1. Review the knowledge and skills relating to the National Health Priorities of Cancer.

2. Attend the BB233 Case Based Simulation Scenario 3. Complete the on-line module for this National Health Priority 4. Complete the BB233 Assessment Task 1 Workbook on the

case scenario of Mr. Dwight and answer all questions. Each answer must be justified and referenced appropriately unless otherwise indicated.

Length: Maximum word count of 2000 words +/-10% (including in text references and excluding reference list). Words in excess of this will not be marked.

Estimated time to complete task:

Approximately 20 hours.

Weighting: Satisfactory (>=50%) or Unsatisfactory (<50%)

If your grade is between 40-49% you will be required to resubmit addressing feedback provided. Only one resubmission will be possible, an unsatisfactory grade will be awarded if the grade is less than 50% for re-submission.

Papers that score less than 40% on the first submission will receive an unsatisfactory grade and will therefore be unsatisfactory in the unit. There will be no opportunity for resubmission.

How will I be assessed: Your responses will be assessed according to clinical content, evidence of critical thinking, adequate standard of academic writing and referencing formatting and quality of sources used.

Due date: Week 4 Sunday 8th December 2019 submitted via Turnitin in your BB233 Blackboard site by 11:59pm.

BB233 Integrated Nursing Practice

Presentation requirements:

This assessment task must:

• Use the template provided on Blackboard under the assessment item (includes cover sheet). Formatting should be as outlined below.

• Workbook questions do not need to be rewritten; identify your responses with numbering.

• Use at least fourteen (14) valid contemporary peer reviewed journal articles with the addition of text books as appropriate

• Any responses that are not referenced to valid, academic sources will receive a mark of zero (0) unless otherwise indicated.

• You MUST include the page number that indicates the actual page in your source where you located the evidence to support your key point in the citation. Failure to do this will attract a zero grade for referencing. Note: markers will be randomly checking references to see that you have accurately represented the source.

• Use APA referencing for citing academic literature • Be submitted in electronic format as a PDF/Word document

via Turnitin. It should also be formatted with the following:

• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit code and page number.

• 3 cm margins on all sides, double-spaced text • Times new roman, font size 12 • Double spaced

Learning outcomes assessed:

1. Demonstrate evidence-based practice, clinical reasoning and decision-making to provide culturally safe, quality, person-centred care consistent with the NMBA Registered Nurse Standards of Practice and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. 3. Coordinate and lead provision of care for consumers, families, and the broader community.

What you need to submit:

You must submit one document that contains the following items:

1. Use the template provided on Blackboard under the assessment item (includes cover sheet).

2. Workbook questions are NOT to be rewritten but clearly identify your assignment

3. Include a reference list at the end of your responses.

4. Final submission should be submitted via Turnitin.

BB233 Integrated Nursing Practice

Resources needed to complete task:

A minimum of 17 academic sources is to be used. You will need to use at least fourteen (14) valid, contemporary peer reviewed journal articles no older than six (6) years as supporting evidence. In addition, you could use:

• Textbooks (maximum of three text books, and no older than five (4) years old

• Guidelines for health professionals that are peer reviewed, • Authoritative websites and government websites such as

NHMRC, NSQHC • Organisation resources intended for health professionals.

BB233 Integrated Nursing Practice

BB233 Collaborative Practice Simulation Workbook / Assessment 1 Rubric

Learning outcomes assessed: 1 & 3 This workbook will be marked in written exam format. Each question is weighted with marks for the response and justification. Marks for academic writing and referencing will also be awarded as per the marking rubric.

5 marks Excellent

4 marks

Good

3 marks

Satisfactory

2 marks

Limited

1 mark

Unsatisfactory

0 marks

Academic Writing

High level of academic writing

Correct terminology and professional language

Skillful use of language that conveys meaning with clarity and fluency.

No errors in tense, spelling, punctuation, or grammar

Good level of academic writing

Generally, uses Correct terminology and professional language

Uses language that effectively conveys meaning with clarity and fluency.

Minimal errors (2-4) in tense, spelling, punctuation, or grammar

Satisfactory level of academic writing

Uses correct terminology and professional language for some of the workbook

Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning.

Occasional errors in tense, spelling, punctuation, or grammar that reduce readability.

Limited level of academic writing

Incorrect terminology and professional language frequently throughout the workbook

Language used means it is frequently difficult to determine meaning

Frequent errors in tense, spelling, punctuation, or grammar that reduce readability

Unsatisfactory level of academic writing

Uses incorrect terminology and professional language throughout the workbook

Uses language that often does not convey meaning or is difficult to determine meaning.

Frequent errors in tense, spelling, punctuation, or grammar that interfere with effective communication. Serious problems with mechanics of language

No submission

Referencing All aspects of APA referencing are technically correct in reference list and in-text referencing.

High level of academic sources used

Minimum of 10 peer reviewed journals accessed in addition to other sources to support work.

Most aspects of APA referencing are technically correct in reference list and in-text referencing.

Generally high level of academic sources used

8-10 peer reviewed journals accessed in addition to other sources to support work.

Infrequent errors in APA referencing in reference list and/or in-text referencing.

Mostly academic sources used with some non- academic sources

Some peer reviewed journals accessed in addition to other sources to support work.

Frequent errors consistent in APA referencing in reference list and/or in-text referencing.

Mostly non-academic academic sources used

Limited number of peer reviewed journals accessed in addition to other sources to support work.

Serious issues with referencing in reference list and/or in-text referencing

Has not used APA referencing

Has used all non-academic sources to support work

AND/OR

Very limited number of peer reviewed journals accessed in addition to other sources to support work.

Absent referencing

No evidence of use of sources to support work