Report (Argument development)

profileshahew
Assessmentitem4.pdf

Assessment item 4 Report Value: 30% Due date: 03-Feb-2018 Return date: 26-Feb-2018 Length: 2000 words Submission method options

Alternative submission method

Task

You are required to write a report on the following topic.

Topic: ‘How can peer-to-peer learning promote student independence?’

You should read the appropriate topics on Interact2 and chapters of your textbook to get information on writing reports.

Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lecturer.

Rationale

An important survival skill for you as a tertiary student is to learn the art of professional report writing. This assessment task is provided to allow you to learn more about the broader context of writing in a report format. Professional report writing requires the application of discipline in conformity with established conventions of presentation, expression, style and format. Learning to write well therefore becomes a life-long educational task. For you to be successful in your university studies, you should be developing skills in analysis and evaluation to improve your ability to think clearly, to document the arguments and findings made by others, and to compare and contrast different viewpoints. Report writing is one such method of assisting students to achieve these tasks.

This assessment addresses the following subject learning objectives.

LO1 - Be able to locate, paraphrase, summarise and comprehend simple to complex English texts LO2 - be able to develop an effective academic argument based on information gained from a range of sources, LO3 - be able to write in a range of academic formats, following English writing mechanics and appropriate academic referencing styles;

Marking criteria

Criteria LO HD (85-100%) DI (75-84%) CR (65-74%) PS (50-64%) FL (0-

49%)

Argument

development

(40%)

1000

words

2 Your arguments are

logical.

You include at least

four key points of

analysis. You

synthesize multiple

references to support

each point.

You include a

substantiated

evaluation of the

research included for

at least two of your

Your arguments are

logical.

You include at least

four key points of

analysis. You

synthesize multiple

references to support

each point.

You make at least 4

recommendations

each linked to the

preceding key points.

Your arguments are

logical

You include at least

four key points of

analysis. You include

at least two articles to

support each point.

You make at least 3

recommendations

each linked to the

preceding analysis.

You include at

least four key

points of analysis.

You include at

least one article to

support each point.

You make at least

2

recommendations

on the topic given.

You do

not meet

the pass

criteria

though

your

attempt is

genuine.

Criteria LO HD (85-100%) DI (75-84%) CR (65-74%) PS (50-64%) FL (0-

49%)

key points

You make at least 4

recommendations

each linked to the

preceding key points.

Organisation

and structure

(25%)

3 You include all

components of a

report

You provide an

accurate yet succinct

executive summary

Your report follows a

logical sequence and

your paragraphs are

logically structured.

You include all

components of a

report

You provide an

accurate yet succinct

executive summary

Your report follows a

logical sequence.

You include all

components of a

report

You provide an

accurate yet succinct

executive summary.

You include all

components of a

report.

You do

not meet

the pass

criteria

though

your

attempt is

genuine.

English

writing

mechanics

(20%)

3 You use formal

academic language

throughout the report

and your sentences

simple yet expressive.

Your report has

minimal typographical

or grammatical errors.

You use formal

academic language

throughout the report.

Your report has some

typographical or

grammatical errors.

You use formal

academic language

throughout your

report

Your report largely

follows the rules of

English writing

mechanics.

You use formal

academic language

in several places.

Your report

partially follows

the rules of

English writing

mechanics.

You do

not meet

the pass

criteria

though

your

attempt is

genuine.

Quality of

articles (5%)

1 You use at least eight

sources.

All eight references

meet all elements of

the CRAP test.

You use at least seven

sources.

All seven references

meet all elements of

the CRAP test.

You use at least six

sources.

All six references

meet all elements of

the CRAP test.

You use at least

five sources

All five references

are academic.

You do

not meet

the pass

criteria

though

your

attempt is

genuine.

Referencing

(10%)

3 Your reference list

and in-text references

are accurate as per

APA6 standard and

include all

components.

You include a variety

of citation techniques.

You include citations

where expected.

Your reference list

shows most references

correctly APA6

formatted and most of

your in-text references

are correctly APA6

formatted

You include a variety

of citation techniques.

You include citations

where expected.

Your reference list

shows most

references correctly

APA6 formatted and

most of your in-text

references are

correctly APA6

formatted

You include a variety

of citation techniques.

Your reference list

shows at least one

reference correctly

APA6 formatted

and you include at

least one in-text

reference correctly

APA6 formatted.

You do

not meet

the pass

criteria

though

your

attempt is

genuine.

No marks awarded but a maximum of 8 marks each may be deducted for errors in the following:

Word count (1500 +/- 10%)

Presentation guidelines

Text match exceeding 20%

Presentation

The assessment should follow the guidelines below

Assessment items should be typed Use 1.5 spacing Use a standard 12 point font such as Times New Roman, Calibri or Arial Left-justify body text

Provide a single reference list that always starts on a new page. The reference list should have the title 'References'

More information can be found here https://student.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/830350/Report-Writing-Checklist.pdf In addition the report must look professional. See your textbook for more details.

Requirements

You must include references to at least five (5) academic references. In addition to five (5) academic references, you are encouraged to refer to additional sources, such as journal articles, book chapters, newspaper articles and practitioner-focused articles.

For this assessment APA referencing format is required. For guidance in the use of this referencing please see the CSU Referencing website at http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu or Academic Reference Tool: https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/

The report must be submitted via Turnitin prior to the due date. It is recommended that your name, student ID and page number are included in the header or footer of every page of the assignment.

The report must include all components of a report. This includes:

Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction Findings and Discussion Conclusion Recommendations References

See appropriate topic notes and sections of your textbook.

The report should be 1500 words in length excluding the executive summary and table of contents.

Additional information to assist you with your assignment can be found here http://student.csu.edu.au/study/skills/guidesandtips/writing-at-uni

The CSU report checklist can be found here http://student.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/830350/Report-writing-checklist.pdf

Layout

Executive summary

PURPOSE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCOPE--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

METHOD-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULTS-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONCLUSION----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMENDATIONS-------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An executive summary or ‘abstract’ is very important as some readers may only read this

part. Write it last, being sure to include a summary of all parts of the report (omitting

examples unless essential) including the:

Please analyse the following “Executive Summary” and highlight the following area:

• „why‟ (purpose and aim)

• „what‟ (scope or breadth of the investigation)

• „how‟ (methodology)

• „what you found out‟ (major findings with key statistics)

• „what this means‟ (implications of findings)

• „so what‟ (recommendations for future actions)

EXAMPLE:

The aim of this report is to investigate UniLab staff attitudes to personal mobile phone use in staff

and team meetings. The research is limited to full-time staff members. A staff survey on attitudes

towards the use of mobile phones in staff/team meetings was conducted. The results indicate that

the majority of full-time staff find mobile phones are disruptive and should be turned off in

meetings. It is concluded that the attitudes of staff members toward mobile phone use is negative. It

is recommended that uniLab develops a company policy banning the use of mobile phones in

exceptional circumstances.

Important