Assessment Evaluation: Behavioral, Remediation, or Intervention Assignment
EDUC 622
Assessment Evaluation Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Focus Selected |
15 to 16 points The correct focus, literacy or other content area, is appropriately chosen and identified. The assessments chosen are from the list of approved instruments. 4 instruments are addressed. |
14 points The correct focus, literacy or other content area, is appropriately chosen and identified. The assessments are not from the list of approved instruments. |
1 to 13 points The correct focus, literacy or other content area, is not chosen or identified. The assessments are not from the list of approved instruments. |
0 points Not present |
|
Summary of Instruments |
15 to 16 points Each summary is written with a scholarly style and provides a clear overview of the assessment. There is clear, specific information unique to the instrument. The population who could be tested with the instrument is included. |
Each summary is written and provides a clear overview of the assessment. There is specific information about the instrument, or the population who could be tested with it is identified. |
1 to 13 points Each summary is an incomplete overview. There is not enough information about the assessment to demonstrate understanding. The population who could be tested with it is not identified. |
0 points Not present |
|
Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses |
19 to 20 points Clear strengths and weaknesses are logically presented with 2 reasons to support each one. |
17 to 18 points Strengths and weaknesses are logically presented most of the time with less than 2 reasons to support each one. |
1 to 16 points Strengths or weaknesses are logically presented some of the time. There are no reasons to support each one, or strengths or weaknesses are missing. |
0 points Not present |
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Justification and Uses of Assessment |
19 to 20 points The justification for why the assessment is valid and reliable demonstrates the purpose and appropriateness of the assessment. It also identifies clear uses of the assessment. |
17 to 18 points The justification for why the assessment is valid or reliable demonstrates the purpose or appropriateness of the assessment. It also identifies uses of the assessment. |
1 to 16 points The justification for why the assessment is valid or reliable does not connect to the purpose or appropriateness of the assessment. It does not clearly identify the uses of the assessment. |
0 points Not present |
|
Data Collection Template |
15 to 16 points The data collection template is fully completed and attached. |
14 points The data collection template is mostly completed and attached. |
1 to 13 points The data collection template is attached but has many incomplete sections. |
0 points Not present |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Mechanics and Page Count |
17 to 18 points The sentence structure is complete with correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and varied word choices. All 4 instrument reviews are submitted in 1 Word document. Each instrument review is at least 2 pages including the data collection template, for a total of 10 pages (including the title and reference pages). |
16 points The sentence structure has minor errors (fragments, run-ons, subject-verb not parallel) with correct spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. There is some variation in word choices. The 4 instrument reviews and the templates are submitted in 2 separate documents. Each instrument review is at least 2 pages including the data collection template, for a total of 10 pages (including the title and reference pages). |
1 to 15 points The sentence structure has several errors in sentence fluency with multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, and punctuation. There is limited variation in word choice. More than 2 separate documents are submitted. The evaluation is less than the required page count. |
0 points Not present |
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Data Collection Template Mechanics |
12 points The data collection template is fully completed and attached to the 1 Word document. It is answered with clarity and in well-developed sentences. |
10 to 11 points The data collection template is mostly completed and attached. Most of the sentences have clarity and are well developed. |
1 to 9 points The data collection template is attached but has many incomplete sections. Some of the sentences lack clarity and are incomplete. |
0 points Not present |
|
Current APA |
7 points The introduction has correct, current APA formatting, including a title page, header, and reference page. The assessment is referenced correctly. |
6 points The introduction has some current APA formatting errors and is missing 1 of the following: a title page, header, or reference page. The assessment is referenced correctly. |
1 to 5 points The introduction has many current APA formatting errors and is missing 2 of the following: a title page, header, or reference page. The assessment is not referenced correctly or is omitted. |
0 points Not present |
|
Total |
/100 |
Page 3 of 3