SENG projject outline
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
|
COURSE: Bachelor of Information Technology |
||
|
Unit: |
Software Engineering |
|
|
Unit Code: |
SENG 205 |
|
|
Type of Assessment: |
Task 3 - Client Presentation |
|
|
Length/Duration: |
20 Minutes |
|
|
Course Learning Outcomes addressed: |
a) To gather, critically analyse, manage and present in meaningful ways information and data b) To prepare design and system documentation and written reports c) To elicit requirements from clients, discuss intermediate solutions and present oral reports as individuals and in teams d) To work collaboratively in small teams on a variety of large and small projects to produce models, software, documentation and reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submission Date: |
Week 12 |
|
|
Assessment Task: |
Presentation |
|
|
Total Mark: |
65 marks |
|
|
Weighting: |
65 % of the unit total marks
|
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
The PowerPoint presentation will be submitted in week 12 of the trimester. Assignment should be submitted on time.
However, consideration will be offered only under severe medical condition or unanticipated extenuating circumstances. You must provide appropriate supporting paper for consideration.
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSIGNMENTS
Assignments should usually incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion, and will be fully referenced including a reference list.
The work must be fully referenced with in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We strongly recommend you to refer to the Academic Learning Skills materials available in the Moodle. For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5 and download the file “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate.
We recommend a minimum of FIVE references, unless instructed differently by your lecturer. Unless specifically instructed otherwise by your lecturer, any paper with less than FIVE references may be failed. Work that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count – as a general rule you may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
High quality work must be fully referenced with in-text citations and a reference list at the end. We recommend you work with your Academic Learning Support (ALS) site (http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5) available in Moodle to ensure that you reference correctly.
References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the lecturer notes. We want to see evidence that you are capable of conducting your own research. Also, in order to help markers determine students’ understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number/s if shown in the original. Before preparing your assignment or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video by clicking on the following link: Plagiarism: How to avoid it
PLAGIARISM: HOW TO AVOID IT
You can search for peer-reviewed journal articles, which you can find in the online journal databases and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be overused – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the NHMRC, or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use nonpeer reviewed websites: Why can't I just Google? (thanks to La Trobe University for this video).
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version: as at 6th June, 2017 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051