SCIENCE: Clinical Field Experience D: Assessment and Feedback

profileRoyce0615
AssessmentandFeedbackRubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-570 ELM-570-O500 Clinical Field Experience D: Assessment and Feedback 25.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Assessment 30.0% Not addressed. Assessment poorly developed and shows vague understanding of mastery of science standards and differentiation strategies. Assessment is underdeveloped and shows limited understanding of mastery of science standards and differentiation strategies. Assessment is adequately developed and designed in order to determine mastery of science standards, with appropriate differentiation strategies. Assessment is proficiently and thoughtfully developed and designed in order to determine mastery of science standards, with well researched and appropriate differentiation strategies.
Reflection 30.0% Not addressed. Reflection is missing and/or lacking in the description of the benefits and implications of providing descriptive, effective feedback to students. Reflection includes an incomplete description of the benefits and implications of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, and providing descriptive, effective feedback to students. Reflection includes a sufficient description of the benefits and implications of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, and providing descriptive, effective feedback to students. Reflection includes a thorough and comprehensive description of the benefits and implications of pre-assessing, implementing instruction, and providing descriptive, effective feedback to students.
Future Implications 10.0% Not addressed. Conclusions and applications to future practice are inappropriate or not related to assignment. Conclusions and applications to future practice are lacking in detail of development as a professional. Conclusions and applications to future practice are thoughtful and reflect growth and development as a professional. Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and clearly reflect growth and development as a professional.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 30.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%