website
MGMT863 Responsible Leadership
Overall Grade:
Note: Your individual mark may change after peer review and other considerations
Trimester 2, 2020
Group Assessment Marking Criteria (30%)
|
Group Name:________________________________ |
||||
|
Criterion |
Indicators of UNSATISFACTORY Achievement |
Indicators of SATISFACTORY Achievement |
Indicators of GOOD Achievement |
Indicators of EXCELLENT Achievement |
|
Presentation |
Has major flaws in presentation
Fails to use various aspects of a Wiki to convey ideas
Does not insert any graphics, or uses only low-quality graphics and multimedia, which do not enhance the content
|
Has some flaws in presentation
Uses some aspects of a Wiki to convey ideas
Selects and inserts many low-quality graphics and multimedia which do not enhance the content |
Has minor flaws in presentation
Demonstrates insight using various aspects of a Wiki
Selects and inserts graphics and multimedia that are mostly high quality and enhance and clarify the content. |
Excellent presentation
Demonstrate excellent insights using various aspects of a Wiki
Selects and inserts high quality graphics and multimedia when appropriate to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability. |
|
Written substantially in own words |
Inadequate use of own words – inappropriate use of the words of others |
Some attempt to use own words - inappropriate use of words of others |
Adequate use of own words – any use of inappropriate words of others very limited |
Used own words with appropriate use of direct quotes from others |
|
Expressed ideas clearly and concisely |
Expression of ideas is confused or difficult to understand
Many spelling and grammatical errors
|
Ideas correctly expressed but at times may not be to the point
Some errors in grammar and spelling |
Clear and concise expression of ideas with only few inconsistencies
Minor errors in spelling and grammar |
Expressed ideas clearly and concisely
Grammatically correct with accurate spelling |
|
Referenced material used within the essay using APA style |
Material not referenced in APA style and/or copyrighted
No reference list or Reference list contains substantial errors |
Some attempt made to reference material in APA style and/or copyrighted
The reference list has some omissions or errors in formatting |
In most cases material appropriately referenced in APA style and/or copyrighted
The reference list is complete but contains some errors
|
APA style and/or copyright is used consistently appropriately and expertly
The reference list is complete and is accurately formatted |
|
Comments:
|
||||
|
Criterion |
Indicators of UNSATISFACTORY
|
Indicators of SATISFACTORY
|
Indicators of GOOD
|
Indicators of EXCELLENT
|
|
Content, analysis and integration |
Relevant issues are not clearly identified
|
Some relevant issues are identified
|
Relevant issues are mostly identified
|
Consistently identifies relevant issues
|
|
|
Largely descriptive with little or no analysis and evaluation |
Some description and limited analysis and evaluation |
Concise & relevant description with good attempt at analysis and evaluation
|
Concise and relevant description with excellent analysis and evaluation |
|
|
Lack of theory or theory not relevant
|
Identified some relevant theory
|
Demonstrates good links between theory and issues |
Excellent identification and interpretation of appropriate theoretical frameworks
|
|
|
Lack of examples or examples not relevant
|
Supports statements with some examples |
Supports statements with relevant examples |
Supports statements with clearly explained and relevant examples |
|
|
|
|
|
May at times demonstrate analysis that is unexpected and insightful |
|
Range and appropriateness of research |
Limited or no use of course materials |
Some use of course material |
Used course material effectively and appropriately |
Used course material to develop better understanding of the question
|
|
|
Limited or no use of secondary research |
Some use of relevant secondary research |
Good use of relevant secondary research |
Excellent use of relevant secondary research |
|
|
Limited or no critical thinking |
Some evidence of critical thinking in research |
Attempts to apply critical thinking to research
|
Applies critical thinking to research |
|
NOTE: Not all criteria are equal |
||||
|
Comments:
|