Emotional intelligence and career goals. POWERPOINT PRESENTATION

Assessment 1 Rubric

Criteria HD D C P F

Introduction of topic

Beginning gains attention. Central idea is focused, clear, and specific. Opening is concise and informative.

Topic introduced clearly and in an interesting way. Purpose is made clear.

Clear introduction and statement of purpose.

Beginning is vague or unfocused.

Opening is absent or difficult to grasp.

Development of topic

Central message is compelling, precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.

Clear, controlled and focussed direction: the presentation is clearly linked and logically ordered points and highly relevant and well developed details.

Central message is clearly stated, appropriately repeated and well supported.

Order of presentation is clear and logical. Links and connections between ideas made clear. Information is relevant and well expressed in own words. Points are well organised and developed with sufficient and appropriate details.

Central message is clear and consistent with the supporting material. Order of presentation makes sense. Beginning, middle, and end are obvious. Most details are in the right place.

Central message is basically understandable but is not often repeated and is not memorable. Some logical order shown. Some links and connections made between ideas. Points are usually developed with minimum detail. Information is usually relevant.

Central message can be deduced, but is not explicitly stated in the presentation.

Order is confusing. Ideas, details, and events not shaped or appropriately detailed. topics seem disjointed or rambling, with no clear direction, reasoning is faulty or unclear.

Analysis

Excellent ability to interpret complex information, to appraise evidence , evaluate arguments and to formulate and express very sound conclusions.

Good demonstration of the capacity to critically analyse information, formulate own conclusions and express own ideas.

Reasonable analysis of information. Able to draw warranted conclusions and generalizations and demonstrate some original thought.

Limited ability to interpret data, appraise evidence or evaluate arguments. Conclusions need improvement and need to express own ideas

No critical analysis of information, poor conclusions and no original thought.

Knowledge Ideas are clearly presented, interesting and

Ideas are clear and interesting and demonstrate

Ideas are not always clearly presented and rely heavily

Ideas lack clarity are not new or interesting and

Ideas are unclear and undeveloped; they are

show understandings of content and a new take on the subject; presentation is focussed, and demonstrates depth and accuracy of understanding.

some creativity. Content is potentially useful in increasing understandings.

on lecture/tutorial /textbook. Content has limited value in increasing understandings.

demonstrate little evidence of gaining new understandings; content has little or no value to the discipline.

merely a regurgitation of case facts/others ideas and demonstrate no evidence of gaining new understandings.

Conclusion of topic Concludes powerfully. Strong closing wraps up topic well and states conclusions clearly.

Conclusions stated clearly. An attempt was made to conclude the presentation.

Closing fails to wrap up topic or make conclusions.