Project initiation ,planning and execution

Assessment 1 by Shubham Goyal

Submission date: 12-Dec-2019 11:53AM (UTC+1100) Submission ID: 1232712908 File name: 10739_Shubham_Goyal_Assessment_1_200328_1518309435.docx (812.37K) Word count: 737 Character count: 3953

15% SIMILARITY INDEX

6% INTERNET SOURCES

0% PUBLICATIONS

11% STUDENT PAPERS

1 5% 2 5% 3 3%

4 2%

Exclude quotes Off

Exclude bibliography On

Exclude matches Off

Assessment 1 ORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to University of Sydney Student Paper

en.wikipedia.org Internet Source

Submitted to Christian Brothers' High School Lewisham Student Paper

Submitted to Asia Pacific International College Student Paper

FINAL GRADE

40/100 Assessment 1 GRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

This is not really an infographic. The images are generic and do not relate specifically to the text

minimal failure factors

minmal ethics discussion

referencing limited

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

RUBRIC: MBA642 ASSIGNMENT 1

SUCCESS (20%)

F (FAIL) ()

P (PASS) ()

C (CREDIT) ()

D (DISTINCTION) ()

HD (HIGH DISTINCTION) (0)

FAIL (20%)

F (FAIL) ()

P (PASS) ()

C (CREDIT) ()

D (DISTINCTION) ()

HD (HIGH DISTINCTION) (0)

ETHICAL (20%)

F (FAIL) ()

P (PASS) ()

C (CREDIT) ()

0 / 0

0 / 0

Analysis of Success Factors

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the learning experience.

Attempts to analyse success factors, but these are vague and unclear.

Analyses several of the success factors and makes several connections to how the learning can be applied.

Analyses many of the success factors and makes many connections to how the learning can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the success factors and the value of the derived learning.

0 / 0

Analysis of Fail Factors

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the learning experience.

Attempts to analyse fail factors, but these are vague and unclear.

Analyses several of the fail factors and makes several connections to how the learning can be applied.

Analyses many of the fail factors and makes many connections to how the learning can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the fail factors and the value of the derived learning.

0 / 0

Ethical Considerations

The analysis does not move beyond a description of the learning experience.

Attempts to analyse ethical considerations, but these are vague and unclear.

Analyses several of the ethical considerations and makes several connections to applying the learning.

D (DISTINCTION) ()

HD (HIGH DISTINCTION) (0)

STRUCTURE (20%)

F (FAIL) ()

P (PASS) ()

C (CREDIT) ()

D (DISTINCTION) ()

HD (HIGH DISTINCTION) (0)

RESEARCH (20%)

F (FAIL) ()

P (PASS) ()

C (CREDIT) ()

D (DISTINCTION) ()

HD (HIGH DISTINCTION) (0)

Analyses many of the ethical considerations and makes many connections to how the learning can be applied

There is an in-depth analysis of the ethical considerations and the value of the derived learning.

0 / 0

Structure and Formatting

The writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure; numerous spelling and grammatical errors.

Writing style lacks clarity, flaws in flow and structure, some use of discipline- specific academic language, several spelling or grammatical errors

The writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline- specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors.

The writing style is clear; Correct use of discipline-specific academic language: some minor spelling or grammatical errors.

The writing style is clear; Fluent use of discipline-specific academic language: no spelling or grammatical errors.

0 / 0

Theory, Research and Referencing

Many errors in logical flow and structure, argument sourced from non-academic literature. No discussion of academic research. Cites very few sources.

Some errors in logical flow and structure, basic discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal number of academic sources. Little discussion of relevant research.

Sound logical flow and structure, a broad discussion of relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several academic sources.

Good logical flow and structure, an argument supported by detailed relevant theory and research sourced from numerous and varied academic sources.

Excellent logical flow and structure, an argument supported by a comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous and varied academic sources.