Can someone write for me on the below essay(introduction is already been written )
Students are to write an essay (2000 words) on one of the topics:
1. ‘Industrial conflict manifests in many forms, such as turnover, absenteeism and strikes. Outlawing strikes will not reduce conflict – there would just be a shift to more covert forms of conflict, such as absenteeism and turnover.’ Critically discuss.
The essay must be correctly structured with a proper introduction (where you address the question, your stance on it, key definitions and outline the structure of the paper), body (where you address one point per paragraph using evidence) and a conclusion (where you reiterate the argument).
In academic writing you are expected to meet certain standards with regards to the level of analysis and provide evidence to support points made in developing a line of reasoning and analysis. Discussion should be based on sound research findings and expert observation and comment. The quality of your writing is determined by the credibility and authority of the sources you cite/reference.
The essay must contain at least 10 academic articles from refereed journals. Further, you must use the HARVARD system of referencing.
It is imperative that you read widely. However, you need to be aware of the credibility of all material you use. For example, while newspaper and business journals and magazines report events and comment on a variety of management issues the ‘facts’ may be reported selectively and their accuracy questionable as their purpose is to sell. Such sources are therefore useful to illustrate points or provide examples in your writing but should not be used as substitutes for peer-refereed academic work.
The assignment will be assessed using the criteria below.
|
|
|
Poor Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent
|
|
Introduction |
|
|
|
Topic and purpose identified clearly |
|
|
|
Key terms defined / explained |
|
|
|
Main argument foreshadowed |
|
|
|
Essay structure foreshadowed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
Evidence of wider reading and understanding |
|
|
|
Content relates well to question / topic |
|
|
|
Relevant concepts / theories identified and addressed |
|
|
|
Use of relevant examples to support argument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality of Argument |
|
|
|
Argument developed in a clear and logical manner |
|
|
|
Relevant evidence used appropriately and critically |
|
|
|
Evidence from various sources integrated and synthesised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion |
|
|
|
Question restated clearly |
|
|
|
Argument restated clearly |
|
|
|
Main points supporting argument summarised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation |
|
|
|
Written expression is clear and correct / Evidence of proof reading |
|
|
|
Objectively written |
|
|
|
Clear linkages between paragraphs |
|
|
|
Quality of presentation ( page nos. / headings etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referencing |
|
|
|
Correct and consistent in-text referencing (Harvard Method) |
|
|
|
Accurate Reference List (Appropriate range & number used & cited correctly in alphabetical order) |
|
|