Business Ethics
Dhruv0282
Assessment.pdf
Assessment by Dhruv Gupta
Submission date: 27-Mar-2021 09:37PM (UTC+0000) Submission ID: 148184242 File name: Business_Ethics_Themes_work.docx (20.83K) Word count: 1790 Character count: 9370
12
1
1
1
3
4
4
6
7
8
9
11
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
10
1
1
1
1
1
26% SIMILARITY INDEX
20% INTERNET SOURCES
0% PUBLICATIONS
14% STUDENT PAPERS
1 14% 2 2% 3 2% 4 1% 5 1% 6 1% 7 1% 8 1% 9 1%
Assessment ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
en.wikipedia.org Internet Source
Submitted to College of the Sequoias Student Paper
Submitted to Aberystwyth University Student Paper
Submitted to Gulf College Oman Student Paper
Submitted to Saint Johns University Student Paper
Submitted to Siena College Student Paper
Submitted to College of the Canyons Student Paper
kalafudra.com Internet Source
Submitted to University of Kent at Canterbury Student Paper
10 1% 11 1% 12 <1%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches Off
Submitted to University of San Francisco Student Paper
www.bbc.co.uk Internet Source
Submitted to Regent's College Student Paper
FINAL GRADE
/0
Assessment GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Comment 1
This is unclear writing. Who is responsible? Whe whole population of the United States?
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
RUBRIC: BUSINESS ETHICS RUBRIC
STRUCTURE
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
SATISFACTORY
DOESN'T MEET EXPECTATIONS
ANALYSIS
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
SATISFACTORY
DOESN'T MEET EXPECTATIONS
SYNTHESIS
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
SATISFACTORY
DOESN'T MEET EXPECTATIONS
Structure (Adherence to the accepted Normative Argument Format)
A precise normative decision based on the case is present. The response maintains a strong focus on developing the claim/topic sentence, thoroughly addressing the demands of the task. An effective organisational structure enhances the reader's understanding of the information.
A normative decision based on the case is present, but it may not completely address the demands of the case, or the response does not maintain focus on developing it. An organisational structure is evident, but may not be fully developed or appropriate.
The normative decision is vague, unclear, or missing, and the response does not address the demands of the case. An organisational structure is largely absent and the relationships between ideas are unclear.
Analysis (Use of Either Utilitarianism, RBT and Stakeholders
The response includes sufficient, appropriate evidence to support the normative decision. Reasoning and understanding of the justification system are demonstrated by thorough explanations of the relationship between claims and support.
The response presents some evidence to support the normative decision, but it may be insufficient or inappropriate. Some understanding of the justification system is demonstrated, but attempts to explain the relationship between claims and support are inadequate.
Evidence is general or largely absent, and explanation of the relationship between claims and support is minimal.
Synthesis (Originality and Persuasive Force)
The response has an established, formal style that is maintained throughout. Varied sentence structure, precise language, and domain-specific vocabulary are used to communicate ideas effectively. The response may stray from an objective tone at times, or have some errors that do not interfere with meaning.
The response attempts a formal style that may not be maintained throughout. Sentence structure is somewhat varied and some precise language and/or domain-specific vocabulary are used. The response contains some errors that may interfere with meaning
The response does not establish a formal style and and ideas are unclear at times. There is little variety in sentence structure and language is general throughout. The response contains several errors that interfere with meaning.
