two..

Assessing Community Health Care Needs Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Assess, via a windshield survey, the general condition and needs of a community from a public health perspective.

Does not assess, via a windshield survey, the general condition and needs of a community from a public health perspective.

Assesses, via a windshield survey, the general condition and needs of a community from a public health perspective, but misses important indicators of health needs within the community.

Assesses, via a windshield survey, the general condition and needs of a community from a public health perspective.

Assesses, via a windshield survey, the general condition and needs of a community from a public health perspective. Specifies applicable safety concerns and the limitations of the survey.

Analyze the environmental factors affecting population health in a community.

Does not analyze the environmental factors affecting population health in a community.

Analyzes the environmental factors affecting population health in a community, but does not include all available information or overlooks key factors affecting population health outcomes.

Analyzes the environmental factors affecting population health in a community.

Analyzes the environmental factors affecting population health in a community. Clearly articulates key health issues, opportunities, and threats. Conclusions are well- supported by credible evidence.

Identify the social determinants of health in a community.

Does not identify the social determinants of health in a community.

Identifies the social determinants of health in a community, but makes unsubstantiated claims or overlooks important contextual factors related to culture and behavioral norms.

Identifies the social determinants of health in a community.

Identifies the social determinants of health in a community. Draws well- reasoned conclusions from credible evidence and articulates underlying assumptions and uncertainties.

Summarize windshield survey and environmental analysis findings for executive leaders.

Does not summarize environmental analysis and survey findings for executive leaders.

Provides a summary that is insufficient to support reasonable conclusions about community health needs.

Summarizes environmental analysis and survey findings for executive leaders.

Summarizes environmental analysis and survey findings for executive leaders. Information is detailed, accurate, and logically organized. Provides insightful lessons learned.

Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Does not write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Writing lacks clarity or conciseness, is loosely structured, or includes errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA formatting that inhibit effective communication or detract from good scholarship.

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Main points, ideas, arguments, or propositions are well- developed and engaging. Adheres to all applicable disciplinary and scholarly writing standards and conventions.

Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Does not support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of assertions, arguments, propositions or conclusions.

Supports assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Supports assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines error- free source citations with

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED a perceptive and accurate synthesis of the evidence.