refunded

Course Evaluation

Course Evaluation Template

September 10, 2019

Course Evaluation

Need a form created and placed in here and need corrections based on feedback file for the executive summary

Executive Summary

The rationale for the assessment and evaluation of assignment is informed by the student’s capacity to attain the learning objectives. The project had specific expected outcomes. In particular, a student ought to identify a clear understanding of palliative care in the pediatric intensive care unit. The information gathered from different course work materials should have been helpful to a student. The total grade and scores in different categories of the assignment play a crucial in the assessment by a tutor. Course evaluation should align with the learning objectives. Therefore, tutors provide valuable materials and inferences to study to improve their exposure to the wealth of information. The assessment in making recommendations in future assignments and course work.

The criteria for evaluation look into several important issues in academic writing and assignments. The structure of the assignment should adhere to the rules of academic assignments (Pereira, Flores & Niklasson, 2016). It should be clear to improve readability and attainment of higher marks. The information in the assignment should be relevant with appropriate evidence. The components required by the tutor should be captured appropriately. The information ranging from findings, conclusions, and personal thoughts should relevant and high to earn higher points. The learning objectives and expected outcomes form an important component in the completion of an assignment. The demands for high-quality and relevant papers play a role in the attainment of higher marks.

The method and points for each criterion are informed by the need to award marks through close examination of all important scenarios. In most class assignments, a tutor is not interested in the correct information; rather, he or she looks at other important elements in academic writing. Therefore, the requirements are provided to the students to make them of the expectations (González-Gómez, Jeong, & Rodríguez, 2016). It is not enough to have the right structure and formatting; rather, it is equally important to observe the correct mechanics throughout the paper.

The grading for each criterion will depend on the length and expected outcomes. The tutor will have the specific maximum points for each component. The approach is helpful in ensuring that students get points based on the quality and relevance of the paper assignment. The evaluation method will also greatly consider adherence to professional writing guidelines. The school has already provided enough resources on professional writing to enable students to get relevant and valuable information in the course of class assignments (Rowan et al., 2017). A student’s paper must show consistency in citations, formatting, in-text citations, headings, and references, among other important components.

Information arising from empirical studies reveals the significance of creating awareness on the guidelines to promote safety culture. Regular audit on the level of compliance in hospitals is necessary to reduce infections (Pereira, Flores & Niklasson, 2016). Some of the key elements that can improve compliance include clinical preferences and convenience. Such contextual factors are mostly linked to in-service education. Since nurses are aware of the importance of observing hand hygiene, they need to be at the forefront of creating awareness in communities (Wittenberg et al., 2016). In addition, health literacy among people is crucial to help in understanding the significance of observing hand hygiene. A student ought to capture the information to get higher points.

Quality papers by a student on the particular topic on palliative care in the intensive paediatric unit should show quality and relevance. High marks are attainable by a student who remains consistent in information, research, evidence, reflection, and professional writing guidelines (Alcarria, Bordel & de AndrÃ, 2018). In addition, quality and relevant papers should reflect graduate-level vocabulary and voice. By the same token, a student should at presenting a paper devoid of grammatical errors and other mechanical mistakes. The content of the paper should be similar to the course and learning objectives.

The evaluation rationale identifies the most critical element for use in awarding points to students after completion of the assignment. The assignment on palliative care in the pediatric care unit reveals important findings and information for prospective nurses and other professionals in the area (Alcarria, Bordel & de AndrÃ, 2018). It has been identified that the formulation of appropriate measures to promote safety culture in health facilities requires collaboration between the nursing professionals, patients, and the community. The interventions should aim at interventions that ensure that hospitals have resources that enhance hand hygiene. Knowledge acquired through nursing should promote the welfare of the entire population. Hand hygiene may appear as a less important issue, but data and findings from various studies reveal the importance of complying with the recommended guidelines (Pereira, Flores & Niklasson, 2016). Nosocomial infections can thus be reduced if the nursing professionals create awareness on observing hand hygiene. The information will improve professional growth in the field besides opening areas of future research studies. The ultimate goal in the nursing practice is to reduce the challenges affecting the people. A healthy population plays a critical role in ensuring the wellbeing of future generations.

References

Alcarria, R., Bordel, B., & de AndrÃ, D. M. (2018). Enhanced peer assessment in MOOC evaluation through assignment and review analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(1), 206-219.

González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: an initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450-459.

Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1008-1032.

Rowan, S., Newness, E. J., Tetradis, S., Prasad, J. L., Ko, C. C., & Sanchez, A. (2017). Should student evaluation of teaching play a significant role in the formal assessment of dental faculty? Two viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Formal faculty assessment should include student evaluation of teaching and viewpoint 2: Student evaluation of teaching should not be part of formal faculty assessment. Journal of dental education, 81(11), 1362-1372.

Wittenberg, E., Ferrell, B., Goldsmith, J., Ragan, S. L., & Paice, J. (2016). Assessment of a statewide palliative care team training course: COMFORT Communication for Palliative Care Teams. Journal of palliative medicine, 19(7), 746-752.