1500 words Essay responding to one question
104 Engaging Media - Assignment 3 Marking Rubric
Final essay: 1500 words
This assignment will be marked according to how well it:
· Provides an informed, critical analysis
· Presents information in a clear, coherent manner
· engages the reader and effectively communicates
· correctly references sources used
1. Analysis / conceptual
|
|
F |
no discernible analysis; does not clearly address the question, or does not fully answer the question; no understanding of course materials, readings or assignment |
|
|
P |
shows lack of understanding of unit material and concepts; significant factual and conceptual errors; does not respond directly to the question as set; confuses some significant ideas or does not engage sufficiently with central terms |
|
|
C |
Attempt at offering independent analysis; shows an understanding of the basic ideas and information involved in the assignment; may not fully engage with central terms; may have some factual, interpretive, or conceptual errors |
|
|
D |
clear analysis of factors central to the assignment; good understanding of concepts; goes beyond the obvious; good engagement with central terms; may contain minor conceptual inconsistency |
|
|
HD |
Presents cogent analysis directly responding to the set question; sophisticated interpretive and conceptual approach; insightful ideas often going beyond those presented in the course materials and reading; overall sophistication in both statement and insight |
2. Structure
|
|
F |
Lack of effective structure, no transitions; incoherent paragraphs; lack of clear introduction and conclusion; indicates little or no planning or revision |
|
|
P |
Ineffective structure; simplistic, wanders from one context to another; ineffective introduction / conclusion; illogical arrangement of ideas |
|
|
C |
Partially effective structure for answering the question; some awkward transitions; arrangement may not appear entirely natural; makes attempt at functional introduction and/or conclusion |
|
|
D |
Effective structure; clear introduction and/or conclusion; good use of paragraphs to delineate points; clear transitions between logically arranged paragraphs that are internally cohesive |
|
|
HD |
Very effective structure for answering the question; appropriate, clear and smooth transitions; arrangement of paragraphs seems particularly apt; highly effective statement of analysis in introduction and conclusion |
3. Written expression / language
|
|
F |
Major problems with written expression; numerous grammatical errors and stylistic problems which seriously distract from the argument and / or make meaning unclear |
|
|
P |
Some problems with written expression; some major grammatical or proofreading errors; language marred by clichés, colloquialisms, inexact word choices |
|
|
C |
Good written expression; may contain some unclear or awkward sentences; imprecise use of words or over-reliance on passive voice; one or two major grammatical errors |
|
|
D |
Very good written expression; some mechanical difficulties or stylistic problems; may make occasional problematic word choices or awkward syntax errors; a few spelling or punctuation errors or cliché; |
|
|
HD |
Excellent written expression; uses sentences effectively; usually chooses words aptly; observes conventions of written English and manuscript format; makes few if any minor or technical errors |
4. Referencing / Appropriate use of sources / support for argument
|
|
F |
uses no references to support points; fails to cite sources or plagiarises; unclear or incorrect referencing style is used |
|
|
P |
Simplistic presentation of ideas as simple narrative or generalisation with little use of sources to support points; insufficient or awkward use of textual evidence; incorrect or mixed referencing style |
|
|
C |
Effort to use sources to support points; some ideas and generalisations unsupported; effort to present quotations appropriately; referencing style may have errors |
|
|
D |
presents clear major points supported with appropriate textual evidence; Effective use of sources and quotations to support points. Correct use of referencing style |
|
|
HD |
well-chosen examples; Very effective use of sources and quotations to support points; Correct use of referencing style; shows evidence of independent research and use of sources outside course materials |
Adapted from UC Irvine Humanities Core Course Rubric; Accessed at http://www.ajdrake.com/e240_fall_03/materials/guides/wr_rubric.htm
Word length and other factors affecting the grade
|
|
Below the word limit |
|
|
Close to or on the word limit |
|
|
Above the word limit |
|
|
|
|
|
Answers question as set |
|
|
Does not answer question as set |
Comments
Final Grade: /40