Hcmp, Ipsum
Received: 12 April 2018 | Revised: 26 May 2018 | Accepted: 3 July 2018
DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12315
OR I G I NA L AR T I C L E
Implementation of a mental health consumer academic position: Benefits and challenges
Brenda Happell RN, RPN, BA (Hons), Dip Ed, B Ed, M Ed, PhD1 | Julia Bocking B Phil (Hons)2 | Brett Scholz BHSci (Hons), PhD3 | Chris Platania‐Phung BA (Hons), PhD4
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, University
of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales,
Australia
2Consumer Academic Synergy, Nursing and
Midwifery Research Centre, University of
Canberra, Faculty of Health, and ACT Health,
Building 6, Level 3, Canberra Hospital,
Australia
3Research Fellow, ANU Medical School,
College of Health and Medicine, The
Australian National University, Canberra,
Australia
4Conjoint Lecturer, School of Nursing and
Midwifery, University of Newcastle,
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Correspondence
Professor Brenda Happell RN, RPN, BA
(Hons), Dip Ed, B Ed, M Ed, PhD, School of
Nursing and Midwifery, University of
Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales,
2308 Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Abstract
Purpose: Academic positions for consumers of mental health services remain rare despite
positive evaluation. This paper considers the benefits and challenges of a consumer
academician position, from perspectives of stakeholders involved in the implementation.
Design and Methods: Qualitative, exploratory involving in‐depth interviews with
academicians. Thematic analysis identified the main benefits and challenges.
Findings: Benefits identified included lived experience perspective and facilitates
interaction and reflection; demonstrating recovery and promoting person centered care.
Challenges identified included process, too close to home, and too little too late.
Practice Implications: Enhanced understanding of consumer academician positions
could increase effectiveness and maximize educational opportunity.
K E YWORD S
consumer academician, consumer participation, education of health professionals, mental health,
mental health nursing
1 | INTRODUCTION
Mental health consumer involvement in the education of health
professionals has gradually emerged as a strategy in the research
literature over recent years. This development has occurred most
frequently within the nursing profession,1–6 with recent activity in
occupational therapy7,8 and social work.9–11
Educational outcomes from consumer academicians are
generally reported as positive, indicating such exposure improves
students’ skills and reduces stigmatized attitudes. Consumer
involvement in health professional education has demonstrated
benefits, such as students developing a greater understanding of
the unique experience of being diagnosed with a mental illness
and mental health service use, a more holistic understanding of
people's needs throughout the health care system, and increased
self‐awareness. These improvements have translated into notable
and person‐centered changes by students to their approach to
practice.10–13
It is unfortunate that this positive evidence has not resulted in
consumer‐led teaching being identified as a necessary component for
quality health professional education, or being further explored as a
strategy to strengthen curricula. Successive national surveys of
nursing programs, conducted approximately 8 years apart,3,14
demonstrated an increase in universities engaging consumers in
nursing education some capacity. It was also demonstrated that most
universities continue to involve consumers in a limited capacity,
primarily in an ad hoc teaching role and usually contained the telling
of narratives, with minimal impact on the curriculum more broadly.3
This approach limits the capacity for transformative change to
curricula, restricts the value and contribution of consumer knowl-
edge gained from lived experience, and curtails the potential impact
on student outcomes.5,11–13
Academic positions for mental health consumers have been
identified as an important initiative to facilitate their transfor-
mative potential within mental health nursing programs6,13,15,16
by expanding beyond ad hoc and often teaching focused
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2019;55:175–182. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ppc © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc | 175
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
input.17,18 Consumer academicians (known in Australia as con-
sumer academics) are people who have been diagnosed with a
mental illness and have utilized mental health services either
voluntarily or involuntarily in the past. Unfortunately, despite
the strong emphasis on consumer participation in Australian
mental health policy,19,20 consumer academician positions remain
rare.3
The strongest developments within consumer academia were
influenced by leadership from the nursing profession,2 and nurses
are identified as potentially strong allies to positively influence
consumer participatory roles.21,22 The potential of nurses as
major influencers is further supported by a limited literature base
suggesting mental health nurse academicians hold positive views
toward consumer involvement in nurse education.2,23 However,
the experiences of most nurse academicians participating in this
research involved consumers as guest lecturers or working in
defined and time‐limited roles. The extent to which these
attitudes may translate into ongoing support for consumer
academician positions cannot be determined from this work
alone and requires further investigation.
This paper considers the impact of implementing a position of
this type on all members of the teaching and research team and
provides in detail the identified benefits and challenges of this
initiative.
The aim of this paper is to present findings from the
perspective of nursing academicians, who are currently pivotal in
maximizing the input of consumer academicians. This information
will provide an enhanced understanding of the implementation
process and identify areas for improvement. It may also offer
direction to teaching academicians and researchers with an
interest in introducing a consumer academician position within
their university.
2 | METHODS
2.1 | Design
The research was undertaken using a qualitative exploratory
approach.24 Qualitative exploratory methods are frequently used to
explore areas where little or no research has been undertaken and
more information is required to develop a knowledge base as a
means to enhance understanding and contribute to further develop-
ment. This approach provides opportunities for key stakeholders to
directly influence knowledge created through their perspectives,
experiences, and insights.
2.2 | Setting
This research was undertaken in an Australian University
providing an undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing program. The
program includes a compulsory mental health nursing subject for
students completing their last semester of the program. One
hundred and ninety‐two students were enrolled in the subject. A
consumer academician was introduced to teach students a
consumer perspective of nonclinical (e.g., stigma) and clinical
aspects (e.g., medication), based on their lived experience of
mental distress and mental health service use. The consumer
academician led three of the eight lectures for the semester. Each
2‐hour tutorial was effectively delivered in two segments of
1 hour. A nurse academician delivered 1 hour and the consumer
academician delivered the second hour.
2.3 | Participants
The research was approved and supported by the Head of School
and coordinator for mental health nursing. Participation was
open to all members of the research and teaching teams, and all
five agreed to participate. Participants included the consumer
academician, the two nurse academicians responsible for teach-
ing and coordinating the mental health nursing component, and
the two mental health researchers coordinating and overseeing
the research.
2.4 | Procedure
Interviews were conducted with the five participants at the
conclusion of the teaching period. Given the dual roles between
researchers and participants, an independent researcher
was employed to recruit participants and conduct the
interviews.
Interviews were organized with each participant at a mutually
convenient time and location. Interviews were conducted individually
and in person. An interview guide provided some structure for the
interviews and ensure specifically identified issues were addressed
(the interview guide is presented in Table 1). At the same time, a
conversational approach was adopted to enable participants to
inform the process with their own experiences, perspectives, and
opinions, and to raise matters not anticipated by the researchers. All
interviews were audio recorded and transcribed by an independent,
external company. The verbatim transcripts provided an accurate
and complete record of interviews.
TABLE 1 Interview guide
1. Please describe your views and opinions about mental health service user involvement in teaching nursing students
2. What do you see as the positives (if any) for students of being taught by a mental health service user? Please explain.
3. What do you see as the negatives (if any) for students of being taught by a mental health service user? Please explain.
4. In what ways (if any) do you feel students’ nursing practice will be influenced by this experience?
5. Having been involved in this teaching are there ways it could be improved? Please elaborate
6. Do you feel service user involvement should be integral to teaching mental health? Please elaborate
176 | HAPPELL ET AL.
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
2.5 | Ethics
The research was approved by the University of Canberra in
Human Research. Participants were informed about the study
verbally initially and given the opportunity to ask questions or
seek additional information. They were provided with a Plain
Language Statement and consent form, to be signed before the
interview commenced. Because there were only five participants
in this project, no information such as pseudonyms or participant
codes has been provided to protect the identity of individuals as
much as possible.
2.6 | Data analysis
Data analysis was based on the five‐step framework of Braun and
Clark.25 Initially, transcripts were read several times to establish
familiarity with the content and its underlying meaning. Specific
content areas were identified, and a code was assigned to each area.
To ensure only relevant information was included, each code was
separately studied with respect to the research aims. Codes of similar
or related content were clustered together into provisional themes. A
conceptual map was developed comprising the provisional themes.
Finally, themes were reviewed for relevance and accuracy. Tran-
scripts were then read once more to ensure no important data had
been omitted from analysis.
3 | FINDINGS
The main themes, delineated as benefits or challenges, are presented
in Table 2.
3.1 | Benefits
Participants discussed the advantages of inclusion of lived experience
perspectives, and the facilitation of interaction and reflection. This
content is presented below.
3.1.1 | Lived experience perspective
All participants saw some advantage in the consumer or lived
experience teaching as an integral part of the curriculum. The use
of story was particularly noted as a technique which encouraged
students to consider their practice from the perspective of those
most closely impacted by services.
Watching the consumer academic … sit in front of the
class and talk about her own personal story with mental
illness, was a very powerful moment … lots of people are
touched by issues of mental ill health, if not within
themselves, by a family member or a friend, and I think
when you start to be able to empathize and think, oh gosh,
okay, the mental health system has treated some people
pretty poorly, what if that was me or what if that was my
mum … it does refine the way that you think about it.
The consumer perspective was broadly viewed as unique and
irreplaceable, and as creating a unique learning experience. It
provided an opportunity for students to more closely understand
the lived experience of mental health service use in a way that could
only be delivered by a person who had firsthand experiences:
I think it's invaluable, I think it should be part of any
quality program … their learning has been directed by
somebody who has that experience and I think that makes
them think differently. It's very easy to read things in a
text book; we should be empathetic … to actually have
somebody say this is what it was like for me when I was
secluded … this is the kind of nursing care found really
useful … it alters attitudes.
3.1.2 | Facilitates interaction and reflection
The presence of a consumer academician provided the opportunity
for more dynamic classroom interaction. This enabled the educa-
tional experience to go beyond merely telling story to enable the
students to ask questions—or even challenge the consumer—to
further enhance their learning:
There is the opportunity for them [students] to ask
questions … They do have the ability to then balance it out
with what they thought and perceived … a student might
go … ‘did that really happen?’ The consumer … can then
engage with the group … I can see how you might feel that
way. But this was my reality and this is how it came across
to me, rather than – no, this is my story. There it is, take it.
This enhanced students’ capacity to be reflective and engage in
critical thinking regarding established mental health nursing practice:
One student referred to a situation described by the
consumer academic: “I could actually see why the nurses
would have thought what they were doing was the right
thing to do and the best thing to do but it actually wasn't,
it was terrible and then the consequences for [the
consumer academic] were shocking,” and that's incredibly
insightful. So even though they might have felt uncomfor-
table hearing about these situations … They are able to go,
TABLE 2 Themes
Benefits Challenges
Lived experience perspective Process
Facilitates interaction and reflection Too close to home
Demonstrating recovery and promoting
person centered care
Too little too late
HAPPELL ET AL. | 177
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
‘well I can see how that could easily happen but now I
know how to avoid it.’
The role of the consumer academician extended beyond story-
telling, with exercises specifically developed to encourage students
to reflect on their personal views and values which can impact on
their nursing role:
…the exercises I did really promoted critical thinking and
there was not a whole lot of critical thinking in the course
… this was being presented with something quite
complicated and having to work it through the critical
thinking exercises … they made the students examine their
own values and bias, which is very important for people
who want to go into mental health nursing … values of the
individual nurse really drive and influence clinical
decision‐making.
The consumer's academic value was noted as a very important
additional skill:
… she was able to share, but also place it in an academic
context. She supplied the students with some readings, so
that was really good. she had some great exercises … Also,
her lecture … was excellent … it was about commu-
nication.
3.1.3 | Demonstrating recovery and promoting person‐centered care
The presence of a lived experience academician provided a firsthand
demonstration that recovery happens and encourages students to
see mental distress as a temporary state, rather than a feature of
their personal identity:
… people who may seem extremely strange are people and
that's a …time when they may be unwell …a snapshot in
their life. [The consumer academic has] had those
snapshots in her life but that's not her life. Her life is …
all these other things that she's really good at and that
she's achieved.
The consumer academician introduced the students to recov-
ery concepts and through providing her own personal experience
was able to humanize the experience. This approach encouraged
students to be more aware and critical of existing clinical practices
and their actual recovery orientation, by recognizing their human
impact:
… my teaching was around person‐ centered nursing
practice and recovery. Recovery is quite a different
approach to the medical model. So where the medical
model seeks to identify deficits and remedy those with
medication, recovery seeks to identify strengths and
maximise those …Recovery is very different from other
ways that they learn to treat illness. For example, I shared
a personal story of being 17 and under clinical observa-
tions, where you are checked every 15 minutes by a nurse
…so I'm in this white room with just a trap door on the
door, and someone looking through every 15 minutes for a
couple of weeks. That's clinically correct, that is a nursing
policy that is in every hospital. But hearing my perception
of that as a 17‐year‐old, I think made them more willing
to critique some of these practices. I think without hearing
the personal experience …they would have not engaged in
that critique.
This type of teaching approach was seen as invaluable as
enhancing communication with people experiencing any mental
distress, whether specifically in the mental health area or not, and
therefore facilitated enhanced communication:
I think students will feel a lot more comfortable to build
rapport with mental health service users. … A very good
example … was where we were talking about connecting
with a service user and developing clinical rapport. And a
student said that when they went on their clinical
placement, they were told by the supervising nurse … to
never ever share anything personal about themselves …
even your favourite food or whether you have a pet. And I
really challenged that … when they went on their second
placement, one of them talked to a young man, who had a
particular football scarf on, about her football team … She
found it was a really effective way of engaging, but it
didn't put her at risk, by providing any personal
information. So, she was quite excited and shared with
the students, how effective that was.
3.2 | Challenges
Participants raised some of their perceived challenges of the
program, including difficulties with the process of a new course
cotaught by consumer academicians, concerns about managing
potential existing relationships between consumer academicians
and other colleagues or students, and the lack of broader
implementation of consumer perspectives in other subjects and
settings.
3.2.1 | Process
Some participants described the implementation of the consumer
academician position as poorly planned, leaving the teaching team
not understanding the rationale or knowing what to expect in the
weekly tutorials:
178 | HAPPELL ET AL.
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
None of those sorts of things were presented to us, until
the moment that the consumer stepped up and wrote
three or four objectives on the whiteboard. This is what
we'll be doing today. Put your pens and pencils down and
here we go. I think students found that interesting … it left
us looking as the academics running the program, what
are we doing? You're not organised.
One participant referred to a member of the teaching team
and one of the researchers being absent for part of the
project team:
it would have been good to be tighter as a group, as a
research group.
Being more organized would also have provided a more
coordinated approach to the teaching:
what we need to do is this … and we will do this … and
together, we'll come up with this. What are you bringing to
it? Let's merge, make sure everything's both complemen-
tary and relevant and go from there … Or is this the
equivalent of two different tutorials?
The view was expressed that students found the different
approaches from the consumer academician and nurse academicians
as disjointed:
The feedback we got through [the online learning
platform from some of the students was that it was
disjointed. They didn't know what was happening. And
mostly, out of the negative stuff, was it just looked
disorganised.
Another participant challenged this thinking, suggesting the
students were more than capable of dealing with different
approaches and teaching techniques:
we can assume that students won't be sophisticated
enough to understand these kinds of issues or that we
need to spoon feed them, but at the end of the day they're
adults, they understand quite complex things, they're very
smart, they got into university and they're doing these
subjects.
The following statement from one participant suggested the
teaching team may not have been fully invested in the project and
may have felt obliged to be involved:
The impression I got was that we needed to participate
and be collegial, or it was just going to be – we're going to
be the uncool kids.
Another participant found the separation between the teaching
academicians and researchers disruptive and believed the process
would have been smoother had they all been part of the team:
It's just they're the researchers, we're the academics and
trying to put the – merge the two together was difficult.
The need for ongoing review for this type of teaching and the
need to adapt to change were highlighted:
if it was to come in within a curriculum, it would need
review every semester, to make sure that the parties that
were teaching were still good with it. That the feedback,
everybody was growing and changing their delivery of the
teaching from the feedback. …You just need other
consumers to come in. You need that refreshment. You
need to keep stirring the punch, otherwise all the fruit
sinks to the bottom.
3.2.2 | Too close to home
Concern was raised by some participants that the consumer
academician was known to some of the students.
The consumer coming from [name of area] … there were
some students that knew [her] … That was a bit close. I did
have a student … one night after a tute … really distressed
about the whole thing. But that was one student.
One participant had previously worked in the mental health
service where the consumer academician had been an outpatient.
The prior clinical relationship created tension, and it was not clear
how to negotiate this in context:
I had no idea what the foundation was for our relationship
and that made it very awkward as well. …
3.2.3 | Too little, too late
Difficulties balancing the consumer content with the broader
curriculum were also noted. The teaching academicians felt the
inclusion of the consumer academician created difficulties in covering
the required content and preparing students for examination:
the time that we had to deliver our content, but then we
had to split the – every tutorial down to allow time for the
consumer academic to deliver her material
Furthermore, devoting course time to the consumer academician
was seen to leave the teaching team with the less interesting content
in order to ensure students achieve course requirements:
HAPPELL ET AL. | 179
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
here's today's boring dry content that you're going to need
to know to pass the exam at the end of the year.
Apparently, this was also an issue of concern for students, who
understandably (most) being in their final semester, were concerned
about completing the requirements for registration as a nurse:
The students wrote in their feedback … they felt that they
weren't getting through the curriculum requirements,
because they had – or the unit requirements, because
they have a set exam.
It was interesting to note that while insufficient time was noted
as problematic, when unexpectedly the consumer academician was
not available, the teaching team found it difficult to fill the time:
There was one time where [consumer academician] was
unable to attend the tutes …. we were notified quite late,
so that left us as a teaching staff, looking for how to fill
seven extra hours of tutorial material.
One participant suggested introducing the consumer academician
component earlier in the curriculum. In addition to increasing student
exposure, it could potentially reduce the impact on individual
students:
… a lesson that they're learning in the last year of their
degree, and I …feel like this probably could come earlier,
and probably should potentially come earlier [with]
consumer perspectives…really embedded throughout the
curriculum.
4 | DISCUSSION
The findings of the current study elaborate on the importance and
value of coproduction of mental health teaching programs. The
advantages of such programs include the ability for students to
better understand, to interact with, and reflect on the perspectives of
lived experience of mental health service, in addition to their own
preexisting value systems. Such coproduction has been identified in
the broader literature as the next critical step to meaningfully
improve clinical practice and reflection.10–13
Realizing these advantages requires certain challenges to be
overcome. The challenges identified in this research include ensuring
that the process of coproduction is meaningfully planned, ensuring
potential existing relationships with consumer academicians are
clarified, and that consumer perspectives become deeply embedded
into curricula. If these challenges are not effectively addressed,
consumer involvement in education is likely to be tokenistic and to
fail to achieve its potential.2,26
Policy requires that consumers are involved at all levels of the
mental health sector,20 and indeed the findings of this study
demonstrate several advantages of the consumer involvement in
curriculum planning and teaching. The landmark Mental Health
Nurse Education Taskforce Report27 has consumer participation
as an underlying principle for mental health nursing content in
undergraduate curricula. Furthermore, current accreditation pro-
cesses for nursing education already require approaches to
curriculum delivery which are collaborative with consumers.28
Some findings of the current study suggest that there is still
resistance toward truly collaborative approaches, particularly
where decision‐making is shared. For instance, one teaching staff
member suggested that if a cotaught subject was to become a
permanent part of the curriculum, “it would need review every
semester, to make sure that the parties that were teaching were
still good with it.” It is not usual practice to review curricula in this
way. Negative attitudes of health professionals to working
collaboratively with consumers are well referenced in the
literature and presents a significant challenge,21,29–31 and there
is no reason to assume nurse educators may not hold similar views.
Truly collaborative approaches can be fostered and galvanized if
accreditation guidelines more clearly require more consumer
involvement in teaching, at least as a starting point.
An interesting finding from this study was the heavy emphasis on
examination results (and passing the course) as one of students’
primary motivations, and hence a strong imperative for teaching
academicians. In the current research, some participants expressed
their views that the consumer perspective component reduced the
time available to address assessment requirements. Some research
critiques this approach. Such a strong focus on examination has been
identified as limiting the creative development of students’ practical
skills.32 Creative thinking is particularly important in mental health
settings and in fostering and promoting consumer participation in
general. This important finding suggests that formal summative or
formative assessment of the consumer component is essential to
meaningfully embedding consumer participation in nursing curricula.
Previous research has demonstrated a positive response to course
assessment developed and undertaken by a consumer academician,
which aimed to enhance student self‐awareness and reflection.12 It is
likely also to demonstrate to students that this content is important
and relevant to their immediate examination results as well as to
their future careers.
While the benefits of offering consumer‐led teaching in nursing
education is well documented in the literature, the current research
highlights some important challenges. Several aspects of the findings
suggest tensions between the consumer academician and the other
teaching staff that may have prevented the full realization of the
advantages of the coteaching program. For instance, participants
talked about the difficulty in trying to “merge the two together,” and
of the other teaching staff having the impression that they “needed
to participate and be collegial.” Tensions between the perspectives of
consumers and other health professionals have been identified in
other studies of the consumer workforce.30,33 It is important that the
value of all perspectives is acknowledged within educational settings,
yet stigmatized attitudes inhibiting implementation are addressed.
180 | HAPPELL ET AL.
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
From the perspective of the three‐stage model of intergroup
contact situations,34 earlier and personalized contact between
intergroup collaborators can assist with greater trust. An implication
of this for educators who seek to coproduce teaching programs
between consumer academicians and other teaching staff relates to
developing trust. Given that the goal of coproduced teaching was not
to merge perspectives but to teach students the value of diverse
perspectives, working together from a position of appreciating and
trusting consumers’ perspectives (without trying to silence or co‐opt) appears an important next step for other teaching staff. Further,
given one participant's concerns that a previous clinical relationship
with the consumer academician made their teaching relationship
awkward, early discussions about collaborating as educators and
moving past previous relationships could be useful in strengthening
collegiality.
5 | RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
One of the limitations of the current study relates to the very specific
setting in which the research was conducted. The five participants
were involved in the same teaching program, and so advantages and
challenges faced by other teams implementing consumer academi-
cian positions may differ. However, the findings may in fact
underscore the importance of mitigating any challenges of coproduc-
tion in other settings that may be less welcoming to consumer
academicians.
6 | CONCLUSIONS
Recruiting consumers of mental health services in academician
positions for the education of nurses and other health professionals
has been identified as a beneficial strategy, and this is borne out in
the findings of the current study. The challenges to this approach
have received significantly less attention. Before they can be
overcome, challenges must be identified and acknowledged, and an
aim of the research presented in this paper is to highlight the
challenges as well as the advantages to better understand the issues
that may be encountered when introducing academic positions for
consumers of mental health services. The knowledge gained will
prove invaluable in implementing these positions. Consumer acade-
micians are as yet a largely untapped resource, with potential to
contribute to the realization of policy goals pertaining to consumer
participation and recovery‐orientated practice. Both are vital to
progress overdue mental health reform.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the funding provided from the Erasmus +
funding for the broader Commune project. We acknowledge the
assistance of Piyada Juntanamalaga in undertaking the interviews.
Our sincere thanks to the participants who generously gave of their
time to describe their experiences and opinions.
ORCID
Brenda Happell http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-6583
REFERENCES
1. Byrne L, Platania‐Phung C, Happell B, Harris S, Bradshaw J. Changing nursing student attitudes to consumer participation in mental health services: a survey study of traditional and lived experience‐led education. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014;35:704– 712. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2014.888604
2. Happell B, Byrne L, McAllister M, et al. Consumer involvement in the tertiary‐level education of mental health professionals: a systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014;23:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12021
3. Happell B, Platania‐Phung C, Byrne L, Wynaden D, Martin G, Harris S. Consumer participation in nurse education: a national survey of Australian universities. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015;24:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12111
4. O' Donnell H, Gormley K. Service user involvement in nurse education: perceptions of mental health nursing students. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013;20:193–202. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01917.x
5. Scammell J, Heaslip V, Crowley E. Service user involvement in preregistration general nurse education: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:53–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13068
6. Schneebeli C, O'Brien A, Lampshire D, Hamer HP. Service user involvement in undergraduate mental health nursing in New Zealand. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010;19:30–35. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00642.x
7. Arblaster K, Mackenzie L, Willis K. Mental health consumer participation in education: a structured litera- ture review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:341–362. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12205
8. Mahboub L, Milbourn BT. Modernising occupational therapy teaching, research and practice in mental health. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:363–363; Pepin G, Haracz K, et al. Identifying educational priorities for occupational therapy students to prepare for mental health practice in Australia and New Zealand: opinions of practising occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62:286–298.
9. Fox J. ‘The view from inside’: understanding service user involvement in health and social care education. Disabil Soc. 2011;26:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011. 544057
10. Goossen C, Austin MJ. Service user involvement in UK social service agencies and social work education. J Soc Work Educ. 2017;53:37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016. 1246271
11. Ridley S, Martin R, Mahboub L. Learning from mental health lived experience and the influence on students’ practice. Australian Social Work. 2017;70:372–380. https://doi.org/10. 1080/0312407X.2016.1235718
12. Byrne L, Happell B, Welch A, Moxham L. Reflecting on holistic nursing: the contribution of an academic with lived experience of
HAPPELL ET AL. | 181
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense
mental health service use. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013a; 34:265–272. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2012.745038
13. Byrne L, Happell B, Welch T, Moxham LJ. ‘Things you can't learn from books’: teaching recovery from a lived experience perspective. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013b;22:195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2012.00875.x
14. McCann TV, Moxham L, Usher K, Crookes PA, Farrell G. Mental health content of comprehensive pre‐registration nursing curricula in Australia. J Res Nurs. 2009;14:519–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987109347041
15. Happell B, Roper C. Promoting genuine consumer participation in mental health education: a consumer academic role. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29:575–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt. 2008.01.004
16. Simons L, Tee S, Lathlean J, Burgess A, Herbert L, Gibson C. A socially inclusive approach to user participation in higher education. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:246–255. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04216.x
17. Happell B, Bennetts W. Triumph and adversity; exploring the compexities of consumer storytelling in mental health nursing education. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016;25:546–553.
18. Happell B, Bennetts W, Platania Phung C, Tohotoa J. Exploring the scope of consumer participation in mental health nursing education: perspectives from nurses and consumers. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2016;52:169–177.
19. Commonwealth of Australia. (2010). National Standards for Mental Health Services. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.health. gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/mental-pubs-n- servst10
20. Commonwealth of Australia. (2017). The Fifth National Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Plan. Canberra: Aus- tralian Government.
21. Byrne L, Happell B, Reid‐Searl K. Risky business: lived experience mental health practice, nurses as potential allies. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016b;25:217–223.
22. Happell B, Scholz B. Doing what we can, but knowing our place: being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018;27:440–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12404
23. Happell B, Bennetts W, Tohotoa J, Platania‐Phung C, Wynaden D. Nothing without vision! the views of consumers and mental health nurses about consumer involvement in mental health nursing education. Collegian. 2016;23:241– 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2015.04.004
24. Stebbins R. Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences: Qualitative Research Methods: Volume 48. London, England: Sage; 2001.
25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
26. McCutcheon K, Gormley K. Service‐user involvement in nurse education: partnership or tokenism? Br J Nurs. 2014;23:1196–1199.
27. Mental Health Nurse Education Taskforce. (2008). Final Report: Mental Health in Pre‐registration Nursing Courses. Melbourne: Final Report: Mental Health in Pre‐registration Nursing Courses.
28. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council. (2012). Registered Nurse Accreditation Standards 2012. Canberra.
29. Ahmed AO, Hunter KM, Mabe AP, Tucker SJ, Buckley PF. The professional experiences of peer specialists in the Georgia mental health consumer network. Community Ment Health J. 2015;51:424–436.
30. Bennetts W, Pinches A, Paluch T, Fossey E. Real lives, real jobs: sustaining consumer perspective work in the mental health sector. Advances in Mental Health. 2013;11:313–326.
31. Scholz B, Gordon S, Happell B. Consumers in mental health service leadership: a systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017;26:20–31.
32. Tawie R, Neging M, Khan MYM, (2017). Preliminary study on creativity in higher education: perceptions of engineering instructors. Paper presented at the Engineering Education (ICEED), 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference.
33. Byrne L, Happell B, Reid‐Searl K. Lived experience practi- tioners and the medical model: world's colliding. J Ment Health. 2016a;25:217–223.
34. Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR, Wagner U, Christ O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int J Intercult Relat. 2011;35:271–280.
35. Commonwealth of Australia. (2013). A National Framework for Recovery‐Oriented Mental Health Services: Policy and Theory. Canberra, Australia: Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council.
How to cite this article: Happell B, Bocking J, Scholz B,
Platania‐Phung C. Implementation of a mental health consumer
academic position: Benefits and challenges. Perspect Psychiatr
Care. 2019;55:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12315
182 | HAPPELL ET AL.
17446163, 2019, 2, D ow
nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /doi/10.1111/ppc.12315 by Southern C
ross U niversity, W
iley O nline L
ibrary on [22/03/2023]. See the T erm
s and C onditions (https://onlinelibrary.w
iley.com /term
s-and-conditions) on W iley O
nline L ibrary for rules of use; O
A articles are governed by the applicable C
reative C om
m ons L
icense