Need assignment done

Criteria Unacceptable 0-5 Satisfactory 6-8 Excellent 9-10

Report Introduction

· Stated purpose and objectives of report (clear and logical) (2 marks)

· Provided background detail to example (3 marks)

· Identify one problem needing to be solved (2 marks)

· State which of the three models you will discuss in this paper (1 mark)

· Clarified any limitations of report (2 marks)

Criteria Unacceptable 0-5 Satisfactory 6-8 Excellent 9-10

Report Introduction

· Stated purpose and objectives of report (clear and logical) (2 marks)

· Provided background detail to example (3 marks)

· Identify one problem needing to be solved (2 marks)

· State which of the three models you will discuss in this paper (1 mark)

· Clarified any limitations of report (2 marks)

Criteria Unacceptable 0-5 Satisfactory 6-8 Excellent 9-10

Professionalism of the document

· Appropriate grammar, formatting, and length (3.5 marks)

· Paper had all required components (.5 mark)

· All facts, models, pro’s con’s, definitions, discussions of each model are uncited (4 marks)

· All References were accurate and used/cited in the report (2 mark)

Criteria Unacceptable 0-17 Satisfactory 18-24 Excellent 25-30

Decision-making models Per Hughes et al. (2019): Decision-Making = Leaders make decisions to implement and give followers the information to follow. Decision-Taking = Followers receive information to follow.

9 marks per model

· Discuss three models in great details that address ONE problem your company has

· Use the textbook to define and discuss each model

· Ensure to use at least 2 academic peer reviewed journal articles per model to help define, explain the model, and discuss its pros and cons

· Provided solid reasons for the choice

· Outlined key components of each model

· Discussed each supporting point thoroughly and clearly

· Supported assertions with research

3 marks for this discussion in the conclusion section

· Make sure to choose one model that is the best fit

· State why this model is the best to solve company problem

Criteria Unacceptable 0-12 Satisfactory 13-16 Excellent 17-20

Explanation of how chosen model is linked to leadership effectiveness

· Gave situational analysis of model use

· Explained how model is linked to leadership effectiveness

· Gave real-life example of connection

· Supported assertions with research

· Tied model components, examples. and research together

Criteria Unacceptable 0-12 Satisfactory 13-16 Excellent 17-20

Integration of concepts from the textbook/other sources

· Used multiple sources in each section (10 marks)

· Used sources to support personal thought/opinion/idea (make sure to use “I believe, I think” do not write “as per me”. You are not yet an academic researcher who is published, therefore, save “as per author (year)” to give power and influence for the academic sources you use.

· Cited sources match concepts discussed

· Balanced personal thought/opinion/idea and research by relating each concept model to your professional life as leader working on one issue in your organization (10 marks)

· Use your organizational example with each model, and made a decision as a leader!

Total

/100