Project article

profileToowm92
ArticleReviewPowerPoint.pptx

Practice-Based vs. Scholarly Articles

Think about educational practices

How do you know which ones to use or if they are research-based?

Scientifically-Based Research

Knowledge in science is depersonalized . . . [and] publically verifiable . . .in a way that personal knowledge never is . . . an adherence to a subjective, personalized view of knowledge is what continually leads education . . .down the well-traveled road of fads, gurus, and uncritical acceptance of so-called authorities.

-Stanovich

Why so many reading problems with so much reading research?

So many myths – colored overlays, vision therapy

Reading disputes – phonics vs. whole language, retention?

Why are so many people poor readers?

Philosophical Differences

Scientific Method (Correspondence Theories)

Test testable questions

Experiments and observations

Structured and systematic

Some are proven, some not

Everyone/anyone can evaluate (standard method of evaluation)

Scientific Method

Constructivism (Coherence Theory)

Knowledge is internally constructed

Knowledge is relative to the believer – what works for you doesn’t work for me

Objectivity not possible – people view the world differently

Rely on observation, but not structured or systematic

All theories and hypothesis believed if it makes sense to the believer

Believe experimentation can not determine if a theory or hypothesis is true

No common standard for evaluating a knowledge claim

Scholarly Articles

http:// umb.libanswers.com/faq/146325

Peer-reviewed

Charts/diagrams

Scientific method

Few or no pictures

Advanced language

Examples: Exceptional Children, Remedial and Special Education; Behavior Disorders

Practice-Based Articles

Pictures

More conversational language

Based more on constructivism and practice

Example: Teaching Exceptional Children, The Reading Teacher