week 3
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY
Article Reflection Paper 3
Submitted to Dr. Kenneth Nehrbass,
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the completion of
GLST 650 – D04
Intercultural Communication and Engagement
by
Mawufemor Biekro
April 14, 2018
Summary
The article, the relationship between culture and information privacy policy, talks about how the legislation of information privacy is influenced by culture. It talks about how corporations and other institutions are increasingly gathering people’s personal and private information so that they can have a competitive advantage and increase profitability. It establishes the fact that there are some cultural values that cause different countries to legislate differently on aspects of information privacy. Power distance is one of the cultural values that affect information privacy policies. Cultures with high power distance expect to have less information privacy, so they lobby to get more information privacy. Another cultural value that affects information privacy policy is human orientation. In cultures where this exists, individuals are rewarded for being fair, generous, and caring for one another. Information privacy is very high in cultures that practice human orientation because there are usually “watch dogs” or whistle blowers who closely monitor organizations that handle people’s private information. Societies that have individualism or collectivism as their cultural value determines how legislation is made about information privacy. Western countries such as the United States practice individualism and information privacy is very high. Eastern countries such as China practice collectivism, so information privacy is low. Other cultural values that affect information privacy are future orientation, performance orientation, uncertainty avoidance, other legislative elements, and many others.
Reflection and Analysis
According to Cockcroft and Rekker, information privacy is defined as “the interest an individual has in controlling or at least significantly influencing, the handling of data about themselves. Increase in technology has led to organizations having the ability to store and keep huge amounts of personal information belonging to their customers. For instance, software such as a Customer relationship management (CRM) has given companies to store and retrieve personal information such as names, addresses, date of birth, social security numbers, credit card information and other personal data.
The article explains that power distance is the extent to which a community accepts and endorses authority, power differences, and status privileges. Cultures that have high power distance usually have leaders and people in authority who are corrupt. This is particularly predominant in African and South American cultures. Information in such societies is usually handled by those in authority, so the people are likely to push for legislation that favors information privacy. Cockcroft and Rekker write, “The first hypothesizing a positive relationship based on trust being lower in high PD societies leading to first, a tendency seek protection from a higher power, and second, a striving to reduce this distance through legislation”.
Bibliography
Cockcroft, Sophie, and Saphira Rekker. "The Relationship between Culture and Information
Privacy Policy." Electronic Markets 26, no. 1 (2015): 55-72. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0195-9.
2