HBR articles to critique

profileINeal
ArticleCritique-Rubric.pdf

Article Critique Grading Rubric

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria Not Acceptable Poor Fair Good

APA Style, Proofreading & Editing of Paper

0 %

Paper has more than 5 problems or errors in the format and mechanics.

50 %

Paper has 3-5 problems or errors in the format and mechanics

75 %

Paper has one or two problems or errors in the format and mechanics.

100 %

Paper is formatted using an APA style: (Includes: Title Page, Abstract & Text Citations). Proofreading & Editing of Paper (Overall paper is free of spelling, grammar and punctuation errors)

Article Summary

0 %

The summary does not cover key points in the article.

50 %

The summary covers some the key points in the article.

75 %

The summary covers most the key points in the article.

100 %

The summary covers all the important key points in the article.

Critique and discussion of the author’s point of view

0 %

Student does not present a clear critique of the article. Contents of essay may be largely summary or be unsubstantiated opinion.

50 %

Student makes an attempt at a critique with some claims, but little supporting evidence.

75 %

Student makes a clear critique of the article, using direct evidence from the text and supporting claims with evidence.

100 %

Student makes a clear, well- articulated, and well-planned critique of the article, using direct evidence from the text and supporting claims with evidence.

Explanation of your own position (agree or disagree)

0 %

The explanation of the position is di�cult to understand and no supportive information

50 %

Paper has explanations on the position (agree or disagree) but no strong supportive information.

75 %

Paper makes explanations on the position (agree or disagree) with supportive information, facts, and references

100 %

Paper makes detailed explanations on the position (agree or disagree) with strong supportive information, facts, and references.

Extensions of real world business application(s)

0 %

The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistent.

50 %

Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are fuzzy.

75 %

Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety.

100 %

A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

Weight 20.00%

View Associated Items