Reaction paper at least 700 words. 24 hours left read article and answer question
Home-based exergaming among children with overweight and obesity: a randomized clinical trial A. E. Staiano , R. A. Beyl , W. Guan , C. A. Hendrick , D. S. Hsia and R. L. Newton Jr.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton
Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Address for correspondence: AE Staiano, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd, Baton Rouge, LA 70815, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Received 14 February 2018; revised 30 April 2018;
accepted 26 May 2018
Summary Background: Given children’s low levels of physical activity and high prevalence of obesity, there is an urgent need to identify innovative physical activity options.
Objective: This study aims to test the effectiveness of exergaming (video gaming that involves physical activity) to reduce children’s adiposity and improve cardiometabolic health.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial assigned 46 children with overweight/obesity to a 24-week exergaming or control condition. Intervention par- ticipants were provided a gaming console with exergames, a gameplay curriculum (1 h per session, three times a week) and video chat sessions with a fitness coach (telehealth coaching). Control participants were provided the exergames following fi- nal clinic visit. The primary outcome was body mass index (BMI) z-score. Secondary outcomes were fat mass by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and cardiometabolic health metrics.
Results: Half of the participants were girls, and 57% were African–American. Intervention adherence was 94.4%, and children’s ratings of acceptability and enjoy- ment were high. The intervention group significantly reduced BMI z-score excluding one control outlier (intervention [standard error] vs. control [standard error]: �0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.03 [0.03], p = 0.016) with a marginal difference in intent-to-treat analysis (�0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.02 [0.03], p = 0.065). Compared with control, the intervention group improved systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (all p values <0.05).
Conclusions: Exergaming at home elicited high adherence and improved children’s BMI z-score, cardiometabolic health and physical activity levels. Exergaming with social support may be promoted as an exercise option for children.
Keywords: African–Americans, coaching, technology, weight loss.
Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Nearly 20% of US children ages 6 to 11 years are af- fected by obesity (1). Young children with obesity are developing early signs of cardiovascular disease (2). Declining physical activity during childhood and into adolescence contributes to significant weight gain (3). Meta-analyses indicate that increasing children’s physical activity over a 24-week period significantly reduces body mass index (BMI) z-score (4) and improves cardiometabolic risk factors (5). However, only 42% of 6- to 11-year-olds and 8% of 12- to
15-year-olds meet national physical activity guidelines of 60 min of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (6); therefore, identifying enjoyable, sustainable physical activity options is a public health priority. Exergames (i.e. video games that require physical
activity) transform sedentary screen time into physically active screen time. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that players can reach light to moderate intensity physical activity while
ORIGINALRESEARCH doi:10.1111/ijpo.12438
Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018 © 2018 World Obesity Federation
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
exergaming (7–10). However, there are contradictory findings on the extent to which exergames can reduce children’s adiposity or improve cardiovascular disease risk factors in the home setting (11–15). The inconsis- tency in findings may be that prior home-based trials lacked a theoretical basis and used exergames as the sole tool for physical activity promotion, resulting in sharp declines in exergaming after a few weeks. The present GameSquad trial used exergaming as
one tool within a behaviour change intervention that was grounded in social cognitive theory (16), which conceptualizes behavioural change as the result of links among behaviours (e.g. exergame play), the environment (e.g. parental and coach support) and psychosocial variables (e.g. self-efficacy and quality of life). Exergames are often played with family mem- bers (17), and social interaction during group-based exergame play is a key predictor of weight loss (18). Exergames encourage exercise through supportive words on the screen like ‘Flawless’ and ‘Almost’ to boost players’ self-efficacy (one’s belief about per- sonal control (16)), which predicts exercise adherence (19). The GameSquad intervention provided social support by requiring children to play with or against a family member or friend and by requiring children and parents to attend telehealth counselling sessions designed to promote self-efficacy and to reduce perceived barriers. The goal of this parallel randomized controlled trial
was to test the effectiveness of the exergaming inter- vention to reduce adiposity and improve cardiometa- bolic health in children with overweight and obesity. Given that the intervention was grounded in behav- ioural theory with the use of social support and telehealth counselling, the primary hypothesis was that children randomized to the exergame intervention would decrease BMI z-score compared with a control group. Secondary hypotheses were that the children in the exergaming intervention would improve car- diometabolic risk factors (20), body composition (fat mass and bone mineral density [BMD]), health behaviours (physical activity and diet) (20) and psychosocial health compared with the control group.
Methods Participants
Parents were recruited for their child’s participation through email, school newsletters, social media, news media, doctors’ offices and community events. Of 96 children whose parents completed an online screen- ing survey, 46 met eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned (see Fig. 1). Inclusion criteria included being between the ages of 10 and 12 years, having a BMI
percentile ≥85th, living in a household with high- speed internet connection and having at least one family member or friend willing to play the exergame with the participant for 3 h week�1. Exclusion criteria included being pregnant; having impairments that prevent normal ambulation; or having an indication of cardiac abnormality or previous or current symp- toms of cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal in- jury or epileptic seizures. All study procedures were approved by the Pennington Biomedical Research Center Institutional Review Board.
Procedures
Interested parents completed a screening form online followed by a phone screen. Eligible children were scheduled for a screening visit where the child pro- vided written assent and the parent/legal guardian provided written consent. Participants were provided with an accelerometer to wear for 7 d and scheduled a baseline clinic visit to occur at least 8 d later. During the baseline clinic visit, participants returned the accelerometer and underwent study measurements. The participant was randomly assigned to the
GameSquad intervention or a control condition, re- vealed by an interventionist (‘fitness coach’) using an opaque sealed envelope after completion of baseline measurements. A biostatistician generated the alloca- tion sequence using biased coin randomization based on the BMI z-score collected at the screening visit to ensure balance across conditions. Participants returned for an end-of-study clinic visit at week 24, occurring within 72 to 168 h following the final gaming session (for intervention participants) to observe cu- mulative rather than acute effects of the exergaming. All data assessors and investigators were blinded to participant’s condition. Each participant randomized to GameSquad was
provided a Kinect® and Xbox 360® gaming console (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), a 24-week Xbox Live subscription and four exergames (Your Shape: Fitness Evolved 2012, Just Dance 3, Disneyland Adventures and Kinect Sports Season 2). Two fitness coaches visited the parent and child at home within 7 d of randomization to deliver and set up the gaming equipment and play the first gaming challenge together. The GameSquad intervention encouraged partici-
pants to meet a goal of 60 min d�1 of MVPA for 24 weeks. Participants were asked to play exergames 3 d week�1 with a family member or friend to help them meet this MVPA goal. Each exergaming partici- pant received a booklet that provided a standardized gameplay curriculum to play three challenges each
Home exergaming in children with obesity | 725
© 2018 World Obesity Federation Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
week with increasing intensity, difficulty and duration (10 min per session in week 1, increasing by 10 min each session and sustained at 60 min per session after week 6). In this booklet, children with parental assistance recorded exergame play start and stop time for each challenge, which was used to calculate compliance and adherence. The maximum duration of 60 min per exergaming session was selected to meet the physical activity guidelines (≥1 h d�1 physical activity) (21) and to not exceed screen time guidelines (≤2 h d�1 recreational screen time (22) with co-viewing/participation with a parent (23)). The telehealth component consisted of each partic-
ipant and a parent in the exergaming condition meet- ing with a fitness coach over video chat via the exergame console, on a weekly basis for the first 6 weeks and biweekly thereafter. Participants in the GameSquad intervention were provided a Fitbit Zip (Fitbit, San Francisco, California, USA) to wear during the 24-week period. Steps per day were wirelessly uploaded and reviewed by the fitness coach. The
fitness coach followed a script for the virtual meetings that reviewed child’s steps per day, recorded gameplay data from the child’s booklet and helped the child and parent to create solutions to barriers for physical activity. The script focused on building the child’s self-efficacy and social support for physical activity (e.g. ‘I’m really proud of you’; ‘Having friends and family can help you stay motivated. What buddies can be physically active with you?’). Participants assigned to the control condition were
asked to maintain their normal level of physical activity for 24 weeks and were provided the Xbox console and exergames following their final clinic visit. All participants received $25 at baseline and $25 at follow-up to compensate for travel costs.
Measures
Screening
The screening visit included a physical examination by a physician or nurse practitioner including Tanner
Figure 1 CONSORT participant flow for the GameSquad trial.
726 | A. E. Staiano et al.
Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018 © 2018 World Obesity Federation
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
staging for sexual maturity, height and weight mea- surement, resting electrocardiogram and a brief read- iness interview to confirm study eligibility. Parents provided child’s birth certificate to confirm date of birth and reported child’s biological sex, race and medical history including pre-existing medical conditions.
Anthropometry
Height and weight were measured on a wall-mounted stadiometer and digital scale, respectively, with the average of two measurements used in the analysis. BMI z-score, BMI percentile over 95th and weight- for-age z-score were calculated based on the child’s age, sex, height and weight based on the 2000 CDC Growth Charts (24).
Adiposity
A dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan was completed with a GE iDXA whole-body scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) to measure total fat mass and % fat mass. BMD (g cm�2) was also calculated for the whole body and by region (trunk, spine and leg). The scans were analysed with Encore V.13.60.033. All female participants (n = 21) com- pleted a urine pregnancy test prior to the DXA scan.
Cardiometabolic risk factors
Resting blood pressure (BP) was assessed using a standard sphygmomanometer after the participant rested for 5 min in a quiet room. The average of two systolic and diastolic measurements was used for analysis, and BP percentiles were calculated based on age, sex and height (25). A blood draw following an 8-h fast was performed by a trained phlebotomist following standard venipuncture standards. Samples were assessed for total cholesterol, triglycerides, glu- cose and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was esti- mated using the Friedewald equation: LDL = total cholesterol � [{triglycerides/5} + HDL].
Physical activity
Physical activity was measured with an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer on the right hip (ActiGraph of Ft. Walton Beach, FL, USA) for 7 d between the screening visit and the baseline clinic visit and for 7 d prior to the end-of-study clinic visit. Accelerometry data were included in the analysis if the participant had data for at least 10 h d�1 with at least 4 d week�1
including one weekend day. Sedentary, light,
moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity were classified based on the criteria of Evenson et al. (26).
Dietary intake
Participants completed the National Cancer Institute’s Self-administered 24-h Dietary Recall (ASA24-Kids) on a web-based program, with parental assistance as needed. Total caloric intake and intake of fat, car- bohydrates and protein were examined. Dietary com- ponents were examined based on the American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health metrics (20).
Psychosocial measures
Psychosocial measures were collected using RED- Cap, a HIPAA-compliant online data capture tool (27). Quality of life was used as a global measure of physical, psychological and social well-being and measured using the KIDSCREEN-10 index (28). Two instruments were selected to assess tenets of social cognitive theory: the 21-item Friendship Quality Ques- tionnaire was used to measure children’s peer sup- port (29) and self-efficacy for physical activity was measured using the physical activity portion of the Self-Efficacy for Healthy Eating and Physical Activity measure (30).
Acceptability surveys
An acceptability survey adapted from a prior exergaming trial (31) was emailed to intervention par- ents for children to complete at weeks 4 and 12 and administered at week 24 clinic visit. Questions in- cluded injuries during game play and intervention enjoyment/acceptability.
Power calculation
An a priori power calculation was used to estimate the sample size needed to detect a significant difference by condition in BMI z-score using a mixed model con- trolling for significant covariates (e.g. sex and age). The recommendation was for �0.09 BMI z-score change relative to the control group based on prior exergaming (15) and exercise trials (4), requiring 23 participants per group allowing for up to 10 drop- outs (18).
Statistical analysis
Age was calculated based on date of birth and base- line clinic visit date. Mixed effects models were used to examine differences by condition in each outcome variable, controlling for baseline value, age and sex. One participant was designated as lost to follow-up
Home exergaming in children with obesity | 727
© 2018 World Obesity Federation Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
after week 3 of the intervention; despite multiple con- tact attempts by phone, mail and e-mail, she did not return for follow-up assessment. A total of 45 partici- pants completed the final study visit and were in- cluded in intent-to-treat analysis. One control participant decreased BMI z-score by 3.3 standard deviations below the mean change in the control group. Therefore, analyses were repeated excluding this outlier. For the physical activity models, 34 participants were included who had complete accelerometry data at both time points, and these models controlled for average daily wear-time. The α level (two-sided) was set at 0.05. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.).
Results Study enrolment and data collection occurred from October 2015 to September 2016. Participants were 11.2 ± 0.8 years of age, including 46% girls and 57% African–American, 41% White and 2% other. Tanner
stage was 2.6 ± 1.2 (range: 1 to 5). See Table 1 for clinical characteristics of the sample. Parent-reported medical conditions in children included anaemia (n = 1), asthma (n = 6), type 2 diabetes (n = 1) and im- paired hearing (n = 2). Based on the American Heart Association criteria (20), most children had ideal BP, fasting glucose and smoking status, whereas 20 had poor or intermediate cholesterol levels, 42 had intermediate physical activity levels (more than 0 but less than 60 min d�1) and all children had poor or intermediate diet score. Adherence to exergaming sessions (completed vs.
expected minutes per week) was 94.4%, and compli- ance (completed vs. expected days per week) was 88.5%. At the readiness interview, 10 parents re- ported concerns that space at home was insufficient for exergame play; ultimately 19 children played the exergames in a living room, two in the child’s bedroom and one in a family gaming room. Reported reasons for non-compliance included schoolwork, sports practice and being sick. Compliance to video chat sessions was 92.7%, and 9.8% of these sessions
Table 1 Baseline body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors overall and by intervention assignment
Overall Intervention Control (n = 46) (n = 23) (n = 23)
Anthropometry BMI, z-score 2.08 (0.44) 2.06 (0.46) 2.10 (0.42) BMI, % over 95th 120.6 (22.4) 120.8 (26.3) 120.5 (18.4) Weight, z-score 2.29 (0.66) 2.28 (0.69) 2.29 (0.65)
DXA Fat mass, kg 29.8 (9.6) 30.4 (11.6) 29.3 (7.4) Fat mass, % 43.1 (4.9) 42.0 (5.9) 44.1 (3.4) BMD whole body, g m�2 1.0 (0.1) 1.0 (0.1) 1.0 (0.2) Trunk 0.9 (0.1) 0.9 (0.2) 0.8 (0.1) Spine 0.9 (0.2) 0.9 (0.2) 0.9 (0.1) Leg 1.1 (0.2) 1.1 (0.2) 1.0 (0.1)
CV risk factors SBP, % 40.0 (23.2) 36.4 (11.6) 43.7 (25.9) DBP, % 60.9 (20.1) 58.5 (17.8) 63.3 (22.4) Cholesterol, mg dL�1 160.6 (37.2) 154.1 (36.8) 167.0 (37.3) HDL-cholesterol, mg dL�1 50.1 (9.1) 48.9 (9.1) 51.3 (9.2) LDL-cholesterol, mg dL�1 94.4 (30.5) 89.4 (31.2) 99.3 (29.6) Triglycerides, mg dL�1 80.7 (50.2) 79.1 (49.1) 82.3 (52.4) Glucose, mg dL�1 89.2 (5.3) 89.7 (4.8) 88.8 (5.8)
Physical activity (n = 45) (n = 23) (n = 22) MVPA, min d�1 35.1 (17.8) 35.0 (17.8) 35.1 (18.3)
Dietary intake (n = 42) (n = 20) (n = 22) kcal d�1 1801.8 (887.3) 1700.0 (905.4) 1894.4 (881.2)
Mean value (standard deviation). BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; CV, cardiovascular; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DXA, dual energy X- ray absorptiometry; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
728 | A. E. Staiano et al.
Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018 © 2018 World Obesity Federation
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
instead occurred over the phone due to faulty Internet connection. Telehealth sessions averaged 14.5 ± 5.2 min in length. Among those randomized to the intervention group, two children reported an in- jury during gameplay (bruise to the ankle or wrist).
Primary outcome
Compared with the control group, the intervention group significantly reduced BMI z-score when the outlier was excluded (intervention [standard error] vs. control [standard error]: �0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.03 [0.03], p = 0.016) and marginally reduced BMI z-score in intent-to-treat analysis (�0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.02 [0.03], p = 0.065).
Secondary outcomes
Compared with the control group, the intervention group improved systolic BP percentile (�5.0 [5.1] vs. 10.9 [5.0], p = 0.036), diastolic BP percentile (�7.4 [4.3] vs. 8.3 [4.2], p = 0.017), total cholesterol (�7.1 [3.5] vs. 6.7 [3.5] mg dL�1, p = 0.011) and LDL- cholesterol (�4.9 [3.1] vs. 7.4 [3.1] mg dL�1, p = 0.010). There was a significant reduction in weight z-score favouring the intervention group (p = 0.049). There was no intervention effect for change in fat mass, % fat mass, BMD, glucose or HDL-cholesterol. The intervention group gained half as much fat mass (0.8 ± 0.5 kg) compared with the control group (1.7 ± 0.5 kg). Findings were similar with the outlier ex- cluded. See Table 2. The intervention group engaged in significantly
more minutes per day of MVPA (3.6 [3.4] vs. �7.8 [3.2], p = 0.028) compared with the control group at week 24. The change by condition in total caloric in- take did not reach significance (�297 [215] vs. 279 [200] kcal d�1, p = 0.069). Baseline self-reported en- ergy intake (1894 ± 881 kcal d�1) aligned with recom- mended dietary guidelines for this age group (32). The intervention group consumed significantly fewer car- bohydrates (�44.6 [25.6] vs. 45.5 [23.7] g d�1, p = 0.017). Findings were similar with the outlier ex- cluded. The intervention group improved self-efficacy towards physical activity compared with the control group (�44.6 [25.6] vs. 45.5 [23.7], p = 0.01). There was no difference by condition in quality of life or peer support.
Intervention acceptability
Children reported playing exergames primarily with a parent (n = 12), alone (n = 6) or with siblings or some- one else (n = 4). Children’s favourite game was Kinect Sports (n = 18) followed by Just Dance 3 (n = 3) and
Your Shape: Fitness Evolved 2012 (n = 1). The major- ity of children found the exergaming acceptable and enjoyable (see Table S1), and 19 children rated the physical intensity of playing the exergames as moder- ate to hard. Children reported wearing the Fitbit every day or just about every day (n = 19), a few times a week (n = 2) or every now and then (n = 1). Twenty children were moderately to extremely satisfied with the Fitbit, and two were slightly satisfied. Half of the children reported buying additional games during the intervention, but these games were primarily non- active games (10 of the 14 games purchased).
Discussion This 24-week home-based exergaming intervention reduced BMI z-score and improved cardiometabolic health among children with overweight and obesity. These results expand upon a home-based exergaming trial that effectively reduced BMI z-score and body fat over a 6-month period (15). By contrast, three trials that provided children with exergames to play at home did not change children’s adiposity or physical activity levels (11–13); one potential explana- tion for lack of effectiveness may be the rapid decline in children’s exergame play after the first few weeks of intervention. The present GameSquad intervention retained excellent adherence for children’s exergaming (94% over 24 weeks) by employing social support including regular video chats with a fitness coach and a gaming curriculum and step tracker to motivate children’s physical activity. The present study observed meaningful improve-
ments in children’s systolic and diastolic BP, total cho- lesterol and LDL-cholesterol. These results align with observations that 24 weeks of physical activity inter- vention can induce measurable changes in children’s cardiometabolic health (5). These improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors were achieved with a BMI z-score difference of 0.08 units, which is similar in magnitude to a 24-week home-based exergaming intervention among 322 10- to 14-year-olds with overweight and obesity (15) and to a systematic re- view on lifestyle obesity treatments for children (4). There is no direct evidence on what BMI z-score change constitutes a clinically meaningful change, with an expert panel suggesting a reduction of �0.20 to 0.25 BMI z-score (33) and other studies in- dicating �0.15 BMI z-score reduction (34). There were no significant treatment effects on DXA-
measured body composition including fat mass, % fat mass or BMD, although the intervention group gained half as much fat mass compared with the control group. The lack of statistical significance may be
Home exergaming in children with obesity | 729
© 2018 World Obesity Federation Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
because the study was powered to detect differences in BMI z-score but not these secondary outcomes. By contrast, a prior 12-week lab-based, supervised exergaming study (180 min week�1 of exergaming) in 41 adolescent girls aged 14 to 18 years significantly reduced abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue and increased BMD in the trunk and spine, compared with a self-directed care control condition (35). The present trial focused on children 10–12 years of age; as indicated in the present data and others (36), chil- dren (especially girls) accumulate fat mass during this peripubertal period as sexual maturation induces hor- monal, biological and behavioural changes that con- tributes to fat accumulation (36). Therefore, a focus on attenuating fat gain (rather than fat loss per se) may be a reasonable approach in the peripubertal age range. While the intervention did not change bone density, the potential detrimental relationship of fat
mass on bone development in children warrants fur- ther attention as evidence indicates that adults with higher fat mass have lower BMD (37). The children’s baseline MVPA (35 ± 18 min d�1) did
not meet physical activity guidelines (60 min d�1) (21) and was lower than accelerometry data from a nation- ally representative sample of children ages 6–11 years (95 min MVPA a day) and 12–15 years (45 min MVPA a day) (6). Intervention participants’ overall MVPA in- creased by 11 min d�1 over the control group between baseline and week 24, and children remained engaged with the intervention across the 24-week period. A change of 11 min d�1 of MVPA after 6 months of inter- vention is important given that the ages of 10 to 12 years are typically characterized by a rapid decline in MVPA (6). This magnitude of change aligns with a prior trial of exergaming in a physical education classroom that increased children’s MVPA by 9 min per session
Table 2 Change in body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors from baseline to week 24 by intervention assignment
Intent to treat (n = 45) Without outlier (n = 44)
Intervention Control
p value
Intervention Control
p value
Adjusted mean difference
Adjusted mean difference
Adjusted mean difference
Adjusted mean difference
Anthropometry BMI, z-score �0.06 (0.03) 0.02 (0.03) 0.065 �0.06 (0.03) 0.03 (0.03) 0.016 BMI, % over 95th �2.2 (1.1) 0.6 (1.1) 0.098 �2.1 (1.1) 0.9 (1.1) 0.070 Weight, z-score �0.10 (0.05) 0.04 (0.05) 0.049 �0.09 (0.05) 0.07 (0.04) 0.022
DXA Fat mass, kg 0.8 (0.5) 1.7 (0.5) 0.9 (0.5) 1.8 (0.5) Fat mass, % �0.5 (0.4) �0.3 (0.4) �0.5 (0.4) �0.3 (0.4) BMD whole body, g cm�2 0.03 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) Trunk, g cm�2 0.03 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) Spine, g cm�2 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) Leg, g cm�2 0.04 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) 0.04 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01)
CV risk factors SBP, % �5.0 (5.1) 10.9 (5.0) 0.036 �4.8 (5.1) 11.3 (5.1) 0.033 DBP, % �7.4 (4.3) 8.3 (4.2) 0.017 �7.4 (4.4) 8.5 (4.4) 0.018 Cholesterol, mg dL�1 �7.1 (3.5) 6.7 (3.5) 0.011 �6.8 (3.6) 7.1 (3.6) 0.011 HDL-cholesterol, mg dL�1 �1.9 (1.4) �0.7 (1.3) �0.7 (1.4) �1.9 (1.4) LDL-cholesterol, mg dL�1 �4.9 (3.1) 7.4 (3.1) 0.010 �4.6 (3.1) 7.8 (3.1) 0.010 Triglycerides, mg dL�1 �3.0 (6.9) 1.4 (6.7) �2.9 (6.9) 1.0 (6.9) Glucose, mg dL�1 0.5 (1.1) 0.4 (1.1) 0.5 (1.1) 0.5 (1.1)
Physical activity MVPA, min d�1 3.6 (3.4) �7.8 (3.2) 0.028 3.4 (3.4) �8.0 (3.3) 0.023
Dietary intake kcal d�1 �297.2 (215.0) 269.5 (200.0) 0.069 �316.4 (211.3) 215.6 (200.4) 0.084
Adjusted estimates (standard error) from mixed effect models controlling for age, sex, baseline value and accelerometer wear-time (for physical activity only). The p values <0.20 are reported and p values <0.05 are indicated in bold text. BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; CV, cardiovascular; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
730 | A. E. Staiano et al.
Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018 © 2018 World Obesity Federation
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
compared with standard physical education (38), al- though the trial was small (n = 4). One study of 60 chil- dren observed 6 min d�1 increase in vigorous physical activity and no difference in MVPA following 10 weeks of home-based exergaming, although this change did not significantly differ from the wait list control group (12). By contrast, other studies observed no change in daily MVPA after 3 (39) to 6 months (11,15) of in-home exergaming, although exergaming use dramatically declined in the first few weeks in trials that did not provide additional support for MVPA (11,39). Self-efficacy towards physical activity significantly
improved during the intervention, aligning with prior exergaming trials that improved youths’ self-efficacy (40). Dietary intake also changed, with the intervention consuming marginally fewer calories and fewer carbo- hydrates compared with the control group. This find- ing aligns with a 24-week exergaming intervention in which the intervention group reduced self-reported daily energy intake from snack food compared with a passive video game control group, although the change was not statistically significant (15). The find- ings also align with a systematic review indicating that adolescents with obesity reduced, or did not change, energy intake following acute bouts of exercise (41). Two adverse events (bruising) were reported in the
GameSquad trial, which is similar to prior exergaming studies reporting minor bruises, hand lacerations and back pain (42,43). Prolonged or overly aggressive play has produced injuries in prior exergaming case studies (8). However, a study comparing injury rates during run- ning vs. exergaming observed 2.44 injuries per 100 h of running vs. no injuries during 201 h of exergaming (44). No exergaming-related serious adverse events have been reported in systematic reviews (43,45). Future tri- als should report on adverse events to inform recom- mendations for exergame play (8), including proper endurance and strength training (46). A unique aspect of the GameSquad intervention
was the inclusion of fitness coaches, who provided telehealth counselling complemented with real-time monitoring of steps per day using a commercially available step tracker. While the fitness coaches were research staff members with bachelor degrees in kinesiology, the coaching role could be fulfilled by a variety of para-professionals or lay health providers. In other words, this home-based intervention could be deployed by a variety of entities if adequate social support and structure are provided to the children and families. A key driver of intervention success is the child’s active engagement within the behaviour change intervention (47). Telehealth directly involves the child in communicating, monitoring and counsel- ling on exercise. As exercise counselling becomes
integrated into primary care delivery, telehealth should be further explored to deliver tailored exercise counselling and support to children with obesity.
Limitations
While there was sufficient power to detect a difference in the primary outcome, the study would have benefited from a larger sample size to reduce variabil- ity. Video chat compliance was objectively captured by the fitness coach, but gaming adherence and compliance were reliant on the child and parental re- port at each gaming session. Coach monitoring at each video chat may have reduced memory recall bias, but social desirability bias is possible. It is not possible to isolate specific intervention components (e.g. time spent in MVPA during exergaming vs. other activities, the role of coach and parental support) that contributed to the difference in BMI z-score and cardiometabolic health. Therefore, future research should examine these influences to identify the most effective strategies to achieve clinically meaningful improvements in children’s adiposity and cardiometa- bolic health. Finally, future trials should conduct follow-up assessments to test for the sustainability of exergame play following the end of the intervention as well as potential sustained effects on children’s cardiometabolic health and health behaviours.
Conclusion
Interactive gaming coupled with telehealth fitness counselling was an acceptable, effective tool to foster physical activity in children with obesity who are in need of sustainable physical activity options.
Conflict of interest statement The authors have indicated that they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. A. E. S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. There was no honorarium, grant or other form of payment to anyone to produce the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by the American Heart As- sociation (grant no. 15GRNT24480070) (to Staiano). This work was partially supported by NORC Center (grant no. P30DK072476) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases enti- tled ‘Nutritional Programming: Environmental and Molecular Interactions’ and 1 U54 GM104940 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center.
Home exergaming in children with obesity | 731
© 2018 World Obesity Federation Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders did not play a role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis or interpretation of the data; the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the publication.
References 1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, et al. Trends in obe- sity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988–1994 through 2013–2014. JAMA 2016; 315: 2292–2299. 2. Geerts CC, Evelein AMV, Bots ML, van der Ent CK, Grobbee DE, Uiterwaal CSPM. Body fat distribution and early arterial changes in healthy 5-year-old children. Ann Med 2012; 44: 350–359. 3. Kimm SY, Glynn NW, Obarzanek E, et al. Relation be- tween the changes in physical activity and body-mass index during adolescence: a multicentre longitudinal study. Lancet 2005; 366: 301–307. 4. Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, et al. Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009: CD001872. 5. Ekelund U, Luan J, Sherar LB, Esliger DW, Griew P, Coo- per A. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adoles- cents. JAMA 2012; 307: 704–712. 6. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 181–188. 7. Barnett A, Cerin E, Baranowski T. Active video games for youth: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health 2011; 8: 724–737. 8. Biddiss E, Irwin J. Active video games to promote phys- ical activity in children and youth: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010; 164: 664–672. 9. Peng W, Lin JH, Crouse J. Is playing exergames really exercising? A meta-analysis of energy expenditure in active video games. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011; 14: 681–688. 10. Gao Z, Chen S, Pasco D, Pope Z. A meta-analysis of active video games on health outcomes among children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2015; 16: 783–794. 11. Baranowski T, Abdelsamad D, Baranowski J, et al. Im- pact of an active video game on healthy children’s physical activity. Pediatrics 2012; 129: e636–e642. 12. Maloney AE, Bethea TC, Kelsey KS, et al. A pilot of a video game (DDR) to promote physical activity and de- crease sedentary screen time. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 2074–2080. 13. Madsen KA, Yen S, Wlasiuk L, Newman TB, Lustig R. Feasibility of a dance videogame to promote weight loss among overweight children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161: 105–107. 14. Murphy EC, Carson L, Neal W, Baylis C, Donley D, Yeater R. Effects of an exercise intervention using Dance
Dance Revolution on endothelial function and other risk fac- tors in overweight children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2009; 4: 205–214. 15. Maddison R, Foley L, Ni Mhurchu C, et al. Effects of ac- tive video games on body composition: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 156–163. 16. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman: New York, 1997. 17. Staiano AE, Calvert SL. Exergames for physical educa- tion courses: physical, social, and cognitive benefits. Child Dev Perspect 2011; 5: 93–98. 18. Staiano AE, Abraham AA, Calvert SL. Adolescent exergame play for weight loss and psychosocial improve- ment: a controlled physical activity intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21: 598–601. 19. Lubans DR, Foster C, Biddle SJ. A review of mediators of behavior in interventions to promote physical activity among children and adolescents. Prev Med 2008; 47: 463–470. 20. Steinberger J, Daniels SR, Hagberg N, et al. Cardiovas- cular health promotion in children: challenges and opportunities for 2020 and beyond: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016; 134: e236-e255. 21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Phys- ical Activity Guidelines for Americans. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2008, p. 2008. 22. Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput J-P. Introduction to the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behav- iour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41: iii–iv. 23. AAP Council on Communications and Media. Media use in school-aged children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2016; 138. 24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A SAS program for the CDC growth charts. 2011; http://www. cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/growthcharts/resources/sas. htm.Accessed July 9, 2015. 25. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Ad- olescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adoles- cents. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 555–576. 26. Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activ- ity for children. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1557–1565. 27. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377–381. 28. Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, et al. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 1487–1500. 29. Bukowski WM, Hoza B, Boivin M. Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: the development
732 | A. E. Staiano et al.
Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018 © 2018 World Obesity Federation
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H
and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. J Soc Pers Relat 1994; 11: 471–484. 30. Steele MM, Burns LG, Whitaker BN. Reliability and va- lidity of the SE-HEPA: examining physical activity – and healthy eating-specific self-efficacy among a sample of pre- adolescents. Health Educ Behav 2013; 40: 355–361. 31. Simons M, Chinapaw MJ, van de Bovenkamp M, et al. Active video games as a tool to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents: rationale, design and methods of a ran- domized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 275. 32. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Scientific report of the 2015 dietary guidelines advisory committee. 2015. 33. O’Connor EA, Evans CV, Burda BU, Walsh ES, Eder M, Lozano P. Screening for obesity and intervention for weight management in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017; 317: 2427–2444. 34. Wiegand S, Keller K-M, Lob-Corzilius T, et al. Predicting weight loss and maintenance in overweight/obese pediatric patients. Horm Res Paediatr 2014; 82: 380–387. 35. Staiano AE, Marker AM, Beyl RA, Hsia DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Newton RL. A randomized controlled trial of dance exergaming for exercise training in overweight and obese adolescent girls. Pediatr Obes 2017; 12: 120–128. 36. Staiano AE, Katzmarzyk PT. Ethnic and sex differences in body fat and visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in chil- dren and adolescents. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2012; 36: 1261–1269. 37. Katzmarzyk PT, Barreira TV, Harrington DM, Staiano AE, Heymsfield SB, Gimble JM. Relationship between ab- dominal fat and bone mineral density in white and African American adults. Bone 2012; 50: 576–579. 38. Fogel VA, Miltenberger RG, Graves R, Koehler S. The effects of exergaming on physical activity among inactive children in a physical education classroom. J Appl Behav Anal 2010; 43: 591–600. 39. Owens SG, Garner IIIJC, Loftin JM, van Blerk N, Ermin K. Changes in physical activity and fitness after 3 months of home Wii Fit™ use. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 3191–3197.
40. Staiano AE, Beyl RA, Hsia DS, Katzmarzyk PT, Newton RL Jr. Twelve weeks of dance exergaming in overweight and obese adolescent girls: transfer effects on physical activity, screen time, and self-efficacy. J Sport Health Sci 2017; 6: 4–10. 41. Thivel D, Rumbold PL, King NA, Pereira B, Blundell JE, Mathieu ME. Acute post-exercise energy and macronutrient intake in lean and obese youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2016; 40: 1469–1479. 42. Sparks D, Chase D, Coughlin L. Wii have a problem: a review of self-reported Wii related injuries. J Innovat Health Informat 2009; 17: 55–57. 43. LeBlanc AG, Chaput JP, McFarlane A, et al. Active video games and health indicators in children and youth: a systematic review. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65351. 44. Tan B, Aziz AR, Chua K, Teh KC. Aerobic demands of the dance simulation game. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23: 125–129. 45. Staiano AE, Flynn R. Therapeutic uses of active videogames: a systematic review. Games Health J 2014; 3: 351–365. 46. Lamboglia CM, da Silva VT, de Vasconcelos Filho JE, et al. Exergaming as a strategic tool in the fight against child- hood obesity: a systematic review. J Obes 2013; 2013: 438364. 47. Pedersen S, Grønhøj A, Thøgersen J. Texting your way to healthier eating? Effects of participating in a feedback in- tervention using text messaging on adolescents’ fruit and vegetable intake. Health Educ Res 2016; 31: 171–184.
Supporting information
Additional supporting information may be found on- line in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.
Table S1. Children’s Acceptability of the GameSquad Intervention.
Home exergaming in children with obesity | 733
© 2018 World Obesity Federation Pediatric Obesity 13, 724–733, November 2018
O R IG
IN A L R E S E A R C H