Revise of a 1k words writing
Argumentative Essay Rubric
Content Organization and Coherence Lexical Resource Grammatical Range
and Accuracy
24-25
- expresses a clear, fully-developed central
argument in response to the article with
relevant, extended, and well-supported ideas
and evidence
- demonstrates acute critical thinking skills
- uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention
- includes a full introduction (hook, background, thesis) and
conclusion
- presents a clear central topic within each paragraph and
develops it fully and clearly
- skillfully uses a range of cohesive devices
- uses a wide range of
vocabulary with very
natural and sophisticated
control of lexical features;
rare minor errors occur only
as ‘slips’
- uses a wide range of
structures with full
flexibility and accuracy;
rare minor errors occur
only as ‘slips’
22-23
- expresses a clear central argument in
response to the article with relevant, and well-
supported ideas and evidence, though some
ideas may not be fully developed
- demonstrates adequate critical thinking skills
- sequences information and ideas logically most of the
time
- includes a fairly clear introduction and conclusion
- uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately
- uses a range of cohesive devices but with some minor
inaccuracies
- uses a sufficient range of
vocabulary and uncommon
words, though there may
be occasional inaccuracies
in word choice and
collocation
- uses a sufficient range of
structures
- the majority of sentences
are error-free with
occasional errors or
inappropriacies
19-21
- expresses a central argument in response to
the article, though the argument and evidence
may be unclear, underdeveloped, or unrelated
to the reading
- demonstrates basic critical thinking skills
- generally sequences information and ideas logically,
though it may take the reader some effort to follow
- an introduction and a conclusion are present, but they
may not be sufficiently developed
- uses paragraphing sufficiently, but the central topic of
some paragraphs is unclear at times
- uses somewhat limited but generally sufficient cohesive
devices
- uses an adequate range
of vocabulary
- inaccuracies in word
choice and collocation may
be common but do not fully
impede communication
- uses an adequate range
of structures
- makes somewhat
frequent errors but they do
not fully impede
communication
15-18
- the argument does not clearly respond to the
article and ideas are unclear and under-
developed
- demonstrates inadequate critical thinking
skills
- presents information with some organization but there
may be a lack of overall progression
- the introduction and conclusion are insufficient
- paragraphs are difficult to parse and often do not have a
central topic
- use of cohesive devices is frequently inadequate
- uses a limited range of
vocabulary and may make
noticeable errors in word
choice and formation
- uses a limited range of
structures
- makes frequent errors
which may impede
communication
1-14
- does not present an argument
- the response does not relate to the reading
- does not organize ideas logically
- no introduction or conclusion are present
- paragraphs do not have a central topic
- use of cohesive devices is mostly inadequate
- uses an extremely limited
range of vocabulary
- attempts sentence forms
but errors in grammar
predominate and distort
meaning
0 Did not complete the assignment.