Farm Management essay 1500 words
ARE 140 Farm Management
Lecture 11.1
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Management Control
Hypothetical returns to management per farm: what is going on?
Gross Sales Net income low third of group
Average net income
Net income of high t third of group
High Third NFIR
$500,0000 $-220,005 $-80,192 $60,661 .0.121
$1,000,000 $-250,087 $-40,693 $130,344 0.130
$2,000,000 $-230,744 $10,260 $270,894 0.135
$5,000,000 $-$630,647 $20,701 $700,200 0.140
Management Functions
● Conceived as 3 Functions: ● Planning ● Implementation ● Control
● Conceived as 5 Functions: ● Planning ● Organizing ● Staffing ● Directing & coordinating ● Controlling
Flow action in management functions
1. Planning
● Planning means choosing a course of action ● To plan a manager establishes goals, identifies
resources, and allocates the resources to selected uses
● Develop an overall plan for the long run, intermediate run, and the current year
2. Implementation
● Once a plan is developed and agreed upon, it is implemented or set in motion
● To implement the manager assembles all the necessary resources needed for the plan and organizes the process
● Staffing and coordinating are part of the implementation function
3. Control: the feed-back function in three steps
2. Measure against standard(s) 1. Establish standards for comparing results
3. Take corrective action to improve performance as needed
1. Establishing standards of control
● Need to understand the business ● Establish standards in context of the whole farm ● but also be specific: establish standards for
each enterprise as needed – Standards in financial management – Standards in agronomic management
1. Establishing standards of control
Financial Standards: ● Budget reviews ● Financial ratios and
evaluations such as NFIR, ROI, Debt/Asset Ratio
Physical Standards: ● Agronomic,
horticultural, livestock performance
2. Measures of Physical Standards
● Crop systems – Yields, e.g. tons per acre – Quality grade – timing of activities
● system performance – amount of time – efficiencies and effect on
and interaction with other systems and enterprises
● Livestock systems – Efficient use of pastures
(AUMs) – Average daily gain in
livestock: feed analysis – Calving or lambing %, or
pigs weaned per sow – Milk production per cow
or doe – Eggs per hen
Example of control function in almond crop ● The Problem: You own and operate a 100-acre almond orchard in Yolo
County that is 10 years old. Soil is class II Capay clay. The County average yield is 2,000 lbs per acre but you only got 1,500 lbs per acre the last 3 years.
● Suggested process to analyze the problem:
Investigating for limiting factor
Example almond production deficiency: Getting to the root cause
● Through scientific investigation you learn limiting factor is poor root development, specifically because of poor water percolation from the solid set sprinkler system
● Causes: sprinklers apply water too fast for clay soil low in OM%
Two part solution: 1) Plant cover crop which improves %OM and creates vertical channels in the soil profile; 2) switch to drip irrigation which emits water at rate that can percolate into the soil without puddling. Note, drip allows better irrigation control and MVP analysis indicates more efficient use of available water. T
Physical efficiency analysis: livestock example
● Not producing enough weight gain or salable animals from a pasture.
● Weakest link: inefficient use of grazing forage
● Solution: subdivide pastures and implement rotational grazing
2. Measures of financial comparison
● A. Budget reviews: the actual performance compared to your projected budget
● B. Comparative analysis: your subject farm compared to other farms in other areas of similar size and type for the same year(s)
● C. Trend analysis: record the performance over period of years to see historical performance thus track trends up or down
2. Measures of Financial Comparison A. budget reviews
● Deviations between projected and actual should be traced to the root cause – doesn't do much good to say my
farm didn't make as much profit as I had hoped for
● Example: “Know your onions!”
– Helps some but not a lot more to know it was the carrots not the broccoli that was the source of the deviation
– Was it lower prices, or higher costs? Technical inefficiency?
● Budget reviews are only as good as the details provide
● Excellent approach : – Cost accounting: with cost
centers organizing concept – Cost accounting at field
level for ● Whole farm
– Enterprise ● Field level
Elements of farm cost accounting
● Cost centers: fields, pieces of equipment, administration, etc.
● Physical data records: labor time sheet, tractor usage, materials applied.
● Financial records: typical accounting by categories of income and expenses – e.g. income such as sale of vegetables – e.g. expenses such as fertilizers, other supplies
Costing hourly usage of equipment
2. Measures of financial comparison: B. comparative information
● Sources of information: – published cost studies
& budgets – lenders – consultants – other farmers
2. Measures of financial comparison C. trends analysis
● Analytical process – Margin or threshold – Comparative ratio –
● Analytical category: – Profitability – Financial efficiency – Solvency – Liquidity – Repayment capacity
How might you measure the marginal cost or benefit?
● Enterprise budgets ● Whole farm budgets ● Cash flow budgets ● Look for the weakest link (remember Liebig's
law of the minimum) ● Partial budgets or cost & benefit analysis a
good tool for reviewing alternative approaches
2. Measures of financial comparison C. trends analysis
● Solvency: e.g. farm debt to asset ratio ● Liquidity: working capital (balance in cash flow account +
available credit) ● Profitability: Historical absolute net income trend by enterprise ● Efficiency: financial (e.g. NFIR), and physical elements ● Repayment capacity ● Appropriate scale: are there adequate resources & ability
to manage
Sample financial analysis chart
Item Budgeted goal or standard
Time 1:
Time 2: Analysis Process
Analysis Category
Working capital
Margin or threshold: a target number
Liquidity
Net income Margin or threshold: a target number
Profitability
Net Farm Income Ratio
Comparative Ratio: see scorecard
Financial efficiency
Debt/Asset Ratio
Comparative Ratio: see scorecard
Solvency
Capital debt repayment capacity
Margin or threshold: a target number
Repayment capacity
?
Solvency ratios
Solvency trend example Using Debt to Asset Ratio
Date Total Liabilities (Debt) Assets Debt/Asset Ratio 1. Jan. 2015 $100,000 $350,000 28.57% 1. Apr. 2015 $90,000 $345,000 26.09% 07/01/15 $115,000 $340,000 33.82% 10/01/15 $140,000 $335,000 41.79% 01/01/16 $190,000 $330,000 57.58% 04/01/16 $200,000 $325,000 61.54% 07/01/16 $200,000 $320,000 62.50% 10/01/16 $200,000 $315,000 63.49%
Liquidity trends: check working capital (balance in cash flow
account + available credit)
Tests for liquidity problems
● Compare purchase of assets to sales and depreciation: acquiring assets too fast?
● Operating debt: goal to repay annually ● Compare cash flow needed for land to typical rental rates ● Compare withdrawals for living expenses to opportunity
cost of unpaid labor ● Debt structure: Examine % current vs. % noncurrent
liabilities and assets – If top heavy, convert current to longer term debt
Profitability Analysis
● Just because a business is solvent and liquid as measured by a financial analysis, this doesn't necessarily mean it is profitable
● Profit analysis begins with a Income Statement
● Is net income a measure of profitability?
Historical trend analysis of tomato enterprise
is problem income or expenses?
Year Gross Income Expenses Net Income 2009 $250,000 $90,000 $160,000 2010 $325,000 $112,000 $213,000 2011 $300,000 $125,000 $175,000 2012 $275,000 $120,000 $155,000 2013 $250,000 $125,000 $125,000 2014 $250,000 $130,000 $120,000 2015 $225,000 $125,000 $100,000 2016 $200,000 $128,000 $72,000
- Slide 1
- Slide 2
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- Slide 30
- Slide 31