602 Paper

home matrices rubrics manage

Powered by iRubric

Powered By iRubric Hello Kathleen log out

home > rubrics >

student view | summary data

Class: BUSN602

Item: Week 5 - Writing Assignment

Possible

Points: 100.0

Instructions: To assess student work using this rubric:

- Click on one level per criterion to select it. - Once finished, click on [save] below the rubric. - Student grade will be calculated and entered in gradebook.

Show: Descriptions Comments

BUSN602 Week 5 Writing Assnmt 100 %

Exemplary 4 pts

Accomplished 3.2 pts

Developing 2.8 pts

Beginning 1.5 pts

Did not attempt 0 pts

Institutional Learning Objectives

ILO: Specialized Knowledge 10 % Elucidates the major theories, research methods and approaches to inquiry, and/or schools of practice in the field; articulates relevant sources; and illustrates their relationship to allied fields.

Exemplary

Student provides a strong introduction to the paper that gives a background of the situation and includes a good thesis statement.

Accomplished

Student provides an introduction to the paper that gives a background and the thesis statement needs work.

Developing

Student provides an introduction to the paper that gives a background but does not provide a thesis statement or the thesis statement needs work.

Beginning

Student provides an introduction to the paper but it does not give a background on the situation and no thesis statement is provided.

Did not attempt

Student does not provide an introduction, background, or thesis statement in the paper.

Quick feedback:

ILO: Broad Integrative Knowledge 10 % Articulates how the field has developed in relation to other major domains of inquiry or practice.

Exemplary

Student pulled research from 6 or more required sources and at least 3 are from peer-reviewed sources.

Accomplished

Student pulled research from 4-5 resources and at least 1-2 are peer-reviewed OR student provides 5+ sources but they are not peer-reviewed.

Developing

Student pulled research from 2-3 resources and at least 1 is peer-reviewed OR student provides 3+ sources but they are not peer-reviewed.

Beginning

Student pulled research from <2 resources and/or they are not peer-reviewed.

Did not attempt

Student did not use any resources in the paper. Quick feedback:

Program Objective

Program Objective 10 % Distinguish and implement analytical financial tools to conduct business analysis and to communicate possible solutions and implementation plans for business decisions.

Exemplary

Identified and discussed 3+ concepts required by the assignment description.

Accomplished

IIdentified and discussed 2 concepts required by the assignment description.

Developing

Identified and discussed 1 concept required by the assignment description.

Beginning

Identified concepts but did not provide details or supporting discussion.

Did not attempt

Did not correctly identify or discuss any of the concepts learned.

Quick feedback:

Course Objective

Substance 30 % CO7. Integrate the methods/ techniques used to make capital budgeting decisions.

Exemplary

Student's paper contains all of the following: (1) Content is complete and accurate. (2) Response demonstrates a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions. (3) Student defined APV and discussed how APV differs from NPV for project valuation. (4) Student identified and discussed two business models that are popular, for example, WACC, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis, etc. for business valuation models.

Accomplished

Student's paper contains 3 of 4 of the following: (1) Content is complete and accurate. (2) Response demonstrates a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions. (3) Student defined APV and discussed how APV differs from NPV for project valuation. (4) Student identified and discussed two business models that are popular, for example, WACC, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis, etc. for business valuation models.

Developing

Student's paper contains 2 of 4 of the following: (1) Content is complete and accurate. (2) Response demonstrates a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions. (3) Student defined APV and discussed how APV differs from NPV for project valuation. (4) Student identified and discussed two business models that are popular, for example, WACC, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis, etc. for business valuation models.

Beginning

Student's paper contains 1 of 4 of the following: (1) Content is complete and accurate. (2) Response demonstrates a clear understanding of the key elements of assignment questions. (3) Student defined APV and discussed how APV differs from NPV for project valuation. (4) Student identified and discussed two business models that are popular, for example, WACC, Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis, etc. for business valuation models.

Did not attempt

Content is incomplete. Response demonstrates a cursory understanding of key elements of assignment questions. For project valuation, defined APV and discussed how APV differs from NPV. Student did not identify or discuss business valuation models OR student did not submit a paper.

Quick feedback:

iRubric home gallery search my rubrics build assessments reports help

APUS RCampus - rubric assessment: RCampus https://irubric.apus.edu/rubricgradeeditf.cfm?xsite=MainSite

1 of 2

Grammar 10 % Paper has been proofread for grammatical errors.

Exemplary

Paper contains 1-2 grammatical errors.

Accomplished

Paper contains 3 or less grammatical errors.

Developing

Paper contains 4 or less grammatical errors.

Beginning

Paper contains 5 or less grammatical errors.

Did not attempt

Paper contains 6+ grammatical errors. Quick feedback:

APA 5 % Paper is in proper APA format.

Exemplary

Paper contains 1-2 APA errors.

Accomplished

Paper contains 3-4 APA errors.

Developing

Paper contains 5-6 APA errors.

Beginning

Paper contains 6-7 APA errors.

Did not attempt

Paper contains 8+ errors or was not submitted in APA format. Quick feedback:

Mechanics 20 % Organization and length of paper.

Exemplary

Paragraph transitions are logical and completely support the flow of thought throughout the paper.

Paper exceeds the 600 minimum content words; assignment is maximum 750 content words.

Accomplished

Paragraph transitions are logical and support the flow of thought throughout the paper.

Paper is 600-700 content words.

Developing

Paragraph transitions are lacking and do not support the flow of thought throughout the paper.

Paper is 550-600 content words.

Beginning

Paragraph transitions are not logical in supporting the flow of thought throughout the paper.

Paper is 450-550 content words.

Did not attempt

Did not correctly identify or discuss any of the concepts learned.

Quick feedback:

Originality

Turnitin 5 % 20% Similarity

Exemplary

Turnitin is less than 15% similarity match after filters applied.

Accomplished

Turnitin is between 16 and 20% similarity match after filters applied.

Developing

Turnitin is over the 20% similarity, less than 30% match after filters applied.

Beginning

Turnitin is over 30% similarity, less than 40% match after filters applied.

Did not attempt

Turnitin is over 40% similarity match after filters applied. Quick feedback:

Overall Feedback:

Quick feedback: private notes

iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc. Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

APUS RCampus - rubric assessment: RCampus https://irubric.apus.edu/rubricgradeeditf.cfm?xsite=MainSite

2 of 2 7/31/2018 12:13 PM

Writing/Mechanics