Unit9 ProgDev DUE 03.11.2020
Print
Appraisal of Proposals Scoring Guide
Due Date: Unit 9 Percentage of Course Grade: 25%.
Appraisal of Proposals Scoring Guide| Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model. 16% | Does not present a program proposal that is appropriate for a nonprofit organization model. | Describes a program that a nonprofit organization may implement, but does not clearly link this proposal to a nonprofit organization model. | Designs a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model. | Designs a program proposal utilizing a nonprofit organization model that emphasizes the organization's mission or outreach. |
| Design a program proposal utilizing a for-profit business model. 16% | Does not present a program proposal that is appropriate for a for-profit business model. | Describes a program that a for-profit business may implement, but does not clearly link this proposal to a for-profit business model. | Designs a program proposal utilizing a for-profit business model. | Develops a program proposal utilizing a for-profit business model that emphasizes the business' social responsibility as a corporate citizen or social entrepreneurship. |
| Differentiate what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are in each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% | Does not present the community needs assessment as part of either program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Discusses community needs assessment information for one, but not both types of entities, or misses identifying significant pieces of the assessment. | Differentiates what the significant pieces of a community needs assessment are in each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Integrates significant pieces of a community needs assessment into each of the program design proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. |
| Integrate accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% | Does not present accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Discusses information on diversity and inclusion through approaches that are culturally sensitive or accessible for one, but not both program design proposals. | Integrates accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for each program design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Critiques how well each program design integrates accessible and culturally sensitive approaches for a nonprofit organization and a for-profit business. |
| Explain what ethical issues arise in conducting program development for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 13% | Does not present ethical issues related to program development that are specific for each of the proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | States but does not explain information on ethics regarding program development, or lacks information for one of the programs. | Explains what ethical issues arise in conducting program development for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Critiques how program development proposals address ethical issues that may impact government funding or contracting. |
| Determine an appropriate program evaluation approach for each design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. 16% | Does not present a program evaluation for both proposals: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Identifies a program evaluation for one, but not both programs, or the evaluation approach lacks important aspects to assess the program. | Determines an appropriate program evaluation approach for each design proposal: one for a nonprofit organization and one for a for-profit business. | Proposes an appropriate evaluation for each design for a nonprofit organization and a for-profit business. |
| Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 13% | Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. | Communicates with persistent writing errors that impede the message or includes language the is not respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. | Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. | Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, is consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession, and is supported with reputable sources. |