Can you answer this question ?

Criteria Ratings Points

Summary: Purpose of study, description of participants/sample, research design, data collection and analysis, results; Identification of whether quantitative and/or qualitative in nature; Identification as program evaluation or action research

35 to >31.0 pts

Advanced

Each section of the summary is clearly and concisely presented with rationale as to selection for the study, but fully summarized with citations as applicable to include. Correctly identified analysis and research type.

31 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

All sections of the summary are identified and supported with some rationale and/or citations as applicable. Identified analysis and research type.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Some sections of the summary are not evident or unclear. Not all information includes citations. May not have identified either analysis and/or research type.

0 pts

Not Present

Sections are incomplete, missing, lacking alignment, and lacking support.

35 pts

Analysis: Further research, validity, original insight/criticism, implications

35 to >31.0 pts

Advanced

The analysis provides multiple directions for further research. There is a complete and concise discussion of the validity/rival hypotheses. Insight/Criticism based on fact, research, or scholarly authority. There is a complete and concise discussion of the implications of research on practice.

31 to >28.0 pts

Proficient

The analysis provides a few directions for further research. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes most aspects of the validity/rival hypotheses. Generally good evidence given in support of insight/criticism. There is a concise discussion which generally recognizes implications for practice.

28 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Directions for further research are unclear or inconsistent with findings. The validity/rival hypotheses tend to be one-sided with aspects missing. Evidence only somewhat supports insight/criticism. The discussion contains unclear implications for practice.

0 pts

Not Present

There is an incomplete discussion of further research, validity/rival hypotheses, or implications. Insight/criticism is not entirely supported. No connection is made between research and practice.

35 pts

Grammar, Spelling and Page Count

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the review. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Must have at least 3 pages.

13 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has 3 pages.

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Has less than 3 pages.

0 pts

Not Present

More than 10 errors that distract the reader from the content. Has only 1 page.

15 pts

Applied Article Analysis Grading Rubric | EDUC750_B11_202220

Criteria Ratings Points

Current APA Format Compliance

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

There are 0–1 minor errors in current APA format in the required items.

13 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

There are 2–3 minor errors in current APA format in the required items.

12 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are more than 3 errors in current APA format in the required items.

0 pts

Not Present

There are more than 5 errors in current APA format.

15 pts

Total Points: 100

Applied Article Analysis Grading Rubric | EDUC750_B11_202220