nursing assignment 3 pages
nolan34
Application.docxApplication: Part 1 - Developing an Advocacy Campaign
The following application (Part 1) will be due in week 4.
To prepare:
· Select a population health issue of interest to you and identify the population affected by the issue.
· Locate two scholarly articles, each of which provides a description of an effective health advocacy campaign that addresses your issue. The articles need to focus on two different advocacy campaigns.
· Analyze the attributes of the two campaigns to determine what made them effective.
· Reflect on a policy you could propose or suggest a change to a current policy to improve the health of the population you selected.
· Consider how you could develop an advocacy campaign, applying the attributes identified in similar, effective campaigns.
To complete:
For the Part 1 application (approximately 3–4 pages of content with a title page and references in APA format) address the following:
· Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue.
· Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.
· Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.
· Begin to develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan:
A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution
· Specific objectives for the policy you want to be implemented
· Begin to substantiate of your proposed campaign by data and evidence.
· Be sure to paste the rubric at the end of your paper.
By Day 7 of Week 4
This Assignment is due.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NURS_5050_Week_04_Application_Rubric
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. |
27 (27%) - 30 (30%) Assignment exceedsexpectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptionalbreadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. |
24 (24%) - 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. |
21 (21%) - 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. |
0 (0%) - 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. |
|
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. |
|
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment's key concepts. |
9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. |
8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. |
7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. |
0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. |
|
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. |
18 (18%) - 20 (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. |
16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. |
0 (0%) - 13 (13%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. |
|
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student's ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. |
18 (18%) - 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. |
16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. |
14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. |
0 (0%) - 13 (13%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. |
|
Exit
