Week 8 Evidence Table

profileIngrid12
APPENDIX-IndividualEvidence_IRizo.docx

3

Appendix A : Individual Evidence Summary

EBP QUESTION:

Article #

Author & Date

Evidence Type

Sample, Sample Size, & Setting

Study findings that help answer the EBP question

Limitations

Evidence Level & Quality

1

Agrawal, M., Gite, V. A., & Sankapal, P. (2020)

Literature

Review

· N/A

It enable me to determine the condition caused by the alcohol

No

recommendations

to improve

Level V

Quality B

2

Jabbour, Y., Abdoulazizi, B., Karmouni, T., El Khader, K., Koutani, A., & Iben Attya Andaloussi, A. (2018).

Pilot Study

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

Effect of diabetic on genital organs

Small sample size

Level V- High

Quality

3

Li, F., Song, M., Xu, L., Deng, B., Zhu, S., & Li, X. (2019)

Single

Research

Study

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

The cause of urinary tract infection in relation to prolong use of cathetes

Small sample size

Level V

Quality B

4

Majumder, M. M. I., Ahmed, T., Ahmed, S., & Khan, A. R. (2018)

Mix method

study

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

The population on individual with urinary infection

Small sample size

Level V

Quality B

5

Hariati, H., Suza, D. E., & Tarigan, R. (2019)

A Pilot Study

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

Provides analysis of the risk elements activating CAUTI

Small sample size,

lack of completed

data & terminology

Level IV

Quality A

6

CURR, O. (2017)

Systematic

Literature

Review

· N/A

It discovered most pathogens to be E. coli and klebsiella spp.

Reliability

dependent on

author’s

interpretation of

primary literature

Level III

Quality B

7

Gnade, C., Storm, D., & Ten Eyck, P. (2017)

Qualitative

Interview Study

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

It encourages the use of alternative methods other than catheterization

Small sample size,

Individual

organization,

Level III

Quality B

8

Gnade, C., Wu, C., Ten Eyck, P., Leder, L., & Storm, D. (2020)

Case Study

· N/A

Measures the catheter utilization and CAUTI rate using binomial scattering and compares the result

Night nurses

studied only

Level III

Quality A

9

Advani, S. D., & Fakih, M. G. (2019)

Literature

Review

· N/A

. It suggests that the chances of CAUTI to develop into secondary complications is very minimal.

No

recommendation

for future study

Level V

Quality B

10

Advani, S. D., & Fakih, M. G. (2019)

Research

Article

· N/A

There must be a sample and location

It advices the use of standardize device utilization ratio which provides a good surrogate that inhibits damages associated with catheter.

No

recommendation

for improvement

Level IIIHigh

Quality

A

Be sure to include the sample (population of interest), sample size (# of participants), setting (location of the participants)

References

(Must be on a separate page and in complete APA format)